Recast Regulation on Insolvency meaning

Brexit—R&I forms for use pre- and post-IP completion day [ARCHIVED] This Checklist is archived and is no longer being maintained. On 30 January 2019, the Insolvency (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (the Insolvency Brexit Regulations), SI 2019/146, were laid under the affirmative procedure for Brexit statutory instruments to remedy deficiencies arising from the loss of mutual application of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (OJ L141/19), the Recast Insolvency Regulation, and to make consequential amendments across related legislation. The instrument took effect in part from 31 January 2019 and in full from IP completion day, defined as 11.00 pm on 31 December 2020. The changes to the legislative framework include revisions to the prescribed information that must be supplied under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, on the appointment of an insolvency office-holder. In many instances, the amendments correspond to the revised jurisdictional gateways for commencing a range of insolvency proceedings...

Petrofac Ltd [2025] EWHC 2887 (Ch) What was the background? Petrofac Ltd (the Company) is a Jersey-incorporated entity, headquartered in London, that functions as the holding company of the Petrofac Group. Its operations comprise owning shares in subsidiaries, delivering management services, and making loans to other Petrofac Group members. Confronted with financial difficulties, in late 2024 the Company promoted a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (the Part 26A plan). Although sanctioned at first instance, dissenting creditors appealed and the Court of Appeal set aside the sanction order. In the wake of that ruling, the Company assessed the feasibility of a business disposal or raising further capital, which evolved into a proposal for senior creditors to acquire the business via a pre-pack administration. Those workstreams progressed in tandem with an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court; permission was ultimately refused on the basis that the Company had reached an agreement in principle on an alternative restructuring proposal. The landscape then changed...

INSOL Europe/LexisR&I joint project on implementation of EU Directive 2019/1023—Bulgaria Lexis R&I and INSOL Europe are gathering articles from INSOL Europe’s membership and Country Coordinators, explaining how EU Member States have put into practice Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures designed to enhance the efficiency of procedures relating to restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, which also amends Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (the EU Directive). A summary table of the outcomes prepared by INSOL Europe in association with Lexis R&I can be accessed here: INSOL Europe/Lexis+® UK Joint Project on EU Harmonisation Directive 2019/1023: consolidated table. As a general rule, you should seek advice from local lawyers in the relevant jurisdiction to confirm the measures currently in effect and the implications of any particular circumstances or nuances of your case. Question 1: When did/will the new restructuring law come into force? What is/are the name...

In this issue: Commercial Competition and state aid Data protection and cybersecurity Financial services Environment Insurance and reinsurance IP Life sciences Regulatory Restructuring and insolvency TMT International Trade Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Commercial Temu’s practices found to breach EU consumer laws The European Commission has informed Temu that a number of its practices breach EU consumer law and has instructed the platform to bring them into line. A co-ordinated investigation by the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network, the Commission and national authorities concluded that Temu misled shoppers with bogus discounts, pushed customers into purchases by falsely claiming limited stock and looming deadlines, and provided incomplete or inaccurate details about consumers’ rights on returns and refunds. Investigators also reported that users were forced to play a ‘spin the fortune wheel’ game to access the marketplace, that fake reviews were used, and that contact information was...

Premier Oil is among a number of oil and gas companies that have reassessed their funding options to cope with the effects of an extended period of low crude prices. Brexit impact From exit day (31 January 2020), the UK ceased to be an EU Member State. Nevertheless, under the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK entered an implementation period, during which EU law continued to apply. In many Brexit SIs, references to exit day should be construed as referring to IP completion day (the end of the implementation period, defined in clause 39 as 31 December 2020 at 11.00 pm), unless that wording is expressly disapplied by the relevant SI. For more detail, see News Analysis: Brexit—impact of the Withdrawal Agreement and European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 for R&I lawyers, and Brexit Bulletin—key updates, research tips and resources. While schemes do not fall within the scope of the Recast Regulation on Insolvency, their later recognition frequently depends on Brussels I (recast) (see below and Practice Note: Brexit—impact on...

Basic principles Owing to the versatility of schemes of arrangement (schemes) (see Practice Note: Benefits of schemes compared to other processes), together with their ability to bind every creditor within the affected classes of a scheme compromise, and the shortcomings perceived in certain domestic restructuring tools in some overseas jurisdictions, schemes are frequently deployed to restructure foreign companies or English companies with substantial assets or creditor bases outside the UK (see Practice Note: Establishing jurisdiction and sufficient connection). Yet, absent recognition, a scheme may have little practical effect, or the scheme company may remain vulnerable to being subject to an overseas insolvency procedure. Consequently, advisers should address recognition questions from the outset of the scheme process. For proceedings issued on or after 31 December 2020, the operative elements of the EU Recast Regulation on Insolvency dealing with automatic recognition, and the EU Brussels I recast, no longer apply to the UK (see: No deal Brexit—impact on jurisdiction agreements—checklist), with recognition now turning on private international law (see Practice Note:...

Different definitions of COMI The expression 'centre of main interests' (COMI) is common in cross-border restructuring and, across the regimes below, (i) is defined in slightly different ways and (ii) results in different consequences: Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (OJ L141 5.6.2015 p 19), the Recast Regulation on Insolvency (EU Recast Regulation on Insolvency) operating between Member States (see Practice Note: Recast Regulation on Insolvency as between Member States-main, secondary and territorial proceedings) (and as it used to apply to the UK pre-Brexit), where COMI determines which courts may commence 'main proceedings'. The Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (Assimilated Recast Regulation on Insolvency) (previously called the Retained Recast Regulation on Insolvency) as it applies to the UK post-Brexit, where COMI identifies which courts can commence 'COMI proceedings' (see further discussion of effects below). The UNCITRAL Model Law on cross-border insolvency (see Practice Note: How courts determine COMI under the UNCITRAL Model Law (and when an Establishment is enough)), where COMI is useful in cross-border recognition matters to...