Rectification meaning

Existence and validity of trusts Provincial Equity Finance Ltd v Dines (née Breda) [2023] EWHC 103 (Ch) News Analysis: A literary epigraph—‘By prosperous voyages I often made… and the great care of goods at random left’—introduces a consideration of resulting trusts and the scope of express trusts. The decision underscores the practical obstacles in proving a resulting trust where a disorganised deceased ran bank accounts for mixed ends, and confirms that an express trust can override the presumption of a resulting trust even if the contributor of funds is not a party to the express trust. Author: Nicholas Holland, McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP Jurisdiction: England & Wales Attorney General v Zedra Fiduciary Services (UK) Ltd and others [2022] EWHC 102 (Ch) News Analysis: The court sanctioned a cy près scheme for a £600m charitable trust to be used towards reducing the National Debt, addressing the suitable application of the National Fund. The judgment considers...

Testamentary capacity Oliver v Oliver [2024] EWHC 2289 (Ch) – News Analysis: Will overturned for want of testamentary capacity and undue influence (Oliver v Oliver). This judgment is an uncommon instance of a successful attack on a professionally drafted Will for both incapacity and coercion, even where the court had a recording of the testator’s instructions and the GP had issued a supporting certificate. Despite those formalities, the court concluded the Will should be set aside on both grounds. Alexandra Rogers, managing associate at Foot Anstey LLP. Leonard v Leonard (by her litigation friend Sharon Thompsett) [2024] EWHC 321 (Ch) – News Analysis: High Court offers guidance on the test for testamentary capacity (Leonard v Leonard). The High Court examines and clarifies Banks v Goodfellow, and underscores the continuing importance of expert evidence in capacity disputes. It underscores how clinical and legal evaluations interact closely, effectively. George Vare, barrister at Serle Court Chambers. Wilkinson v Hicken [2023] EWHC 1983 (Ch) – News Analysis: Personality disorders...

Under an asset purchase, the purchaser takes only the selected assets and assumes only the specific liabilities it opts to accept, as detailed in the asset purchase agreement. After completion, issues highlighted by due diligence may require the purchaser to address environmental, health and safety (EHS) matters. For example, the purchaser might need to transfer or apply for a permit, join a recognised packaging waste compliance scheme, or strengthen health & safety documentation following completion. Typical post-completion EHS actions in asset purchase transactions include the following: transferring environmental permits verifying whether the deal triggers any new duties under environmental regimes, such as producer responsibility, energy efficiency and carbon schemes tackling points raised in environmental audits and reports, and any contractual conditions advising on the scope of environmental insurance and other risk-mitigation strategies putting in place reliance agreements or collateral warranties to allow reliance on environmental reports Transfer of environmental permits In an asset sale, the name of the operator/permit...

This flowchart takes you through the stages of a CIETAC arbitration under the CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2024 Although each arbitration differs and the tribunal will tailor proceedings to specifics of the case, it remains vital to appreciate how an arbitration will 'usually' progress, together with the timescales likely to apply...

STOP PRESS: This document is currently being updated to take account of the full implementation of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025), which amends both the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. For further guidance on the compliance consequences of DUAA 2025, see Practice Note: Data (Use and Access) Act 2025—compliance implications. The UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) grants data subjects several rights, including, among others: access to their personal data rectification erasure restriction of processing data portability a right of data subjects Individuals may ask an organisation at any time of their choosing to exercise one or more of these rights, and strict time limits and deadlines apply to responding to such requests promptly. See Practice Note: How to handle data subject requests. This Flowchart sets out a process for dealing with data subject requests made under the UK GDPR and reflects the requirements in the UK GDPR together...

The EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) sets out several rights for data subjects, including the right to access their personal data, and rights to rectification, erasure, restriction of processing and data portability. Data subjects may ask an organisation to exercise one or more of these rights at any time, and strict deadlines apply to meeting such requests. For comprehensive guidance on managing data subject access requests, see Practice Note: Ireland-How to handle data subject access requests. This Flowchart outlines a process for dealing with data subject requests made under the EU GDPR. It reflects the Regulation’s requirements alongside guidance issued by the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), and should be read with Practice Note: Ireland-How to handle data subject access requests and Ireland-Evaluating a data subject access request-flowchart, where relevant. Note 1-data subject requests The EU GDPR grants data subjects a number of rights, including: a right of access to their personal data rights to rectification, erasure and restriction of processing a...

In this issue: Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Consumer protection Contracts Data protection Sale and supply of goods Supplier management LexTalk®Commercial: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers ASA rulings—6 November 2024 The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received two complaints about CurrencyWave and Eurostar. Complainants said CurrencyWave’s ad wrongly implied Financial Conduct Authority regulation and used inaccurate price comparisons. For Eurostar, concerns were that Instagram and Facebook ads overstated the availability of £39 fares and omitted key information. The ASA upheld both. See: LNB News 06/11/2024 51. ASA publishes its Vaping Project Review on vaping ads targeted at under-18s The ASA has issued its Vaping Project Review, detailing outcomes from investigations, tech-assisted monitoring, enforcement, stakeholder engagement and advisory work on ads aimed at under-18s since June 2023. It found influencers, companies, agencies and vaping brands posting paid and organic content, plus brand...

Narendra Thillainathan v Mohomed Khan and others [SC Appeal Nos 200/2018, 200A/2018, 200B/2018 & 200C/2018] Supreme Court of Sri Lanka What are the practical implications of this case? Section 27 of the Act, addressing the rectification of arbitral awards, derives from Article 33 of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Jurisprudence remains sparse on both the ambit and the process governing a tribunal’s power to correct its award. First, the Court examined whether the amendments ran counter to the tribunal’s own reasoning in the Original Award, and whether they fell outside ‘errors in computation, clerical or typographical slips, omissions, or comparable mistakes’. The Court concluded that this argument was legally misguided: the Tribunal had never dismissed the claim for the Return sought in the Statement of Claim, as asserted by the Borrowers. The failure to include the Return was, therefore, a plain omission by the Tribunal. Secondly, the judgment sheds light on the procedural steps to be followed when entertaining an application to correct an award....

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—29 August 2024 In this issue: Corporate insolvency processes Restructuring Personal insolvency Directors and insolvency Daily and weekly news alerts Corporate Rescue and Insolvency (August 2024 edition) New Q&A Corporate insolvency processes Company’s register of members | Conclusive or not for voting rights? (Bland v Keegan) In proceedings relating to JDK Construction Ltd (JDK), the Court of Appeal examined a challenge to the lawfulness of a written resolution appointing joint liquidators, alongside allegations of an unauthorised share transfer form. The Appellant argued her shares in JDK were wrongfully transferred, rendering the liquidators’ appointment invalid. The key question was whether the company’s register of members—recording her shares as transferred—was determinative for validating the members’ resolution. Affirming the decision of His Honour Judge Hodge KC, the Court of Appeal held that the register stands as prima facie evidence of who the members are and of the validity of resolutions passed by them, unless...

Lexcel is the Law Society’s benchmark for practice management. Accreditation is optional, yet Lexcel status can assist firms seeking recognition under the Conveyancing Quality Scheme or the Legal Service Board's Specialist Quality Mark. This Practice Note explains every step of the post-assessment pathway. Processing final report Soon after your assessment (typically two to three days), the assessor will send you the final report by email. It will set out any minor and/or major non-compliances, highlight areas for improvement, and note examples of good practice. A duplicate of the report will be forwarded to the Law Society panel...

The general principles In an ideal scenario, the wording and provisions of contracts, deeds and other documents would be free of ambiguity, preventing misunderstanding when construing them; yet, in reality, and in practice, that is not invariably so. Consequently, the courts have fashioned methods or principles for construction and interpretation, including the interpretation of scheme deeds and rules in the pensions context. The principles governing the construction of documents are now well settled and uncontroversial. The courts’ objective is to construe documents by ‘common sense’ standards; they ultimately consider the ordinary and natural meaning of the language employed. These principles have been refined, built upon and expanded through a number of significant House of Lords and Supreme Court decisions. Judicial reasoning has built upon these foundations...

Legal validity of Wills In Scots law, a testamentary writing made after 1995 is treated as valid and self‑proving where the following requirements are met: the testator has signed every page the signing took place in the presence of a witness the witness signed the final page The absence of one or more of these features is not fatal, provided the testator did sign the document. If so, anyone with an interest (for example, an executor or beneficiary) may ask the court to ‘set up’ the writing. This can be done by summary application in the Sheriff Court, or incidentally within other proceedings, and in practice is often pursued when applying for confirmation. The burden of proof rests on the applicant, and evidence will usually be by affidavit unless the court directs otherwise. A decree has the effect of creating a presumption that the document was subscribed by the person granting it. Grant of confirmation Confirmation is the...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

STOP PRESS: This document is under revision to account for commencement of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025), which introduces amendments to UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018. For more detailed guidance on DUAA 2025 compliance ramifications, please consult Practice Note: Data (Use and Access) Act 2025—compliance implications...

Claimant: [ initial and surname ]; 1st: [ date ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS [ OF ENGLAND AND WALES OR IN [ location ] ] PROPERTY, TRUSTS AND PROBATE LIST (ChD) Claim No: [ x ] [ x ] and [ x ] [ x ] (a child by [ name ] his/her litigation friend) etc... WITNESS STATEMENT OF [ x ] I, [ name ], of [ address/workplace ], [ occupation ], [ WILL SAY AS FOLLOWS ]: I am the Claimant in these proceedings and the [ position under the trust ] of the trust dated [ xxx ], called the [ xxx Trust ] (the Trust)...

Meaning of ‘covenant’ Definition and construction of covenant: Halsbury’s Laws of England [448] states that a covenant is a promise contained in a deed, binding the parties, or any one of them, to do, or to refrain from doing, a particular act. The term may nonetheless be read so as to include provisions in an agreement under hand where, absent such construction, the wording would be deprived of effect; for example, where a document refers to the “covenants” of a lease that is not executed by deed...