Related rights meaning

Section 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) requires planning consent for any material change in the use of buildings or land. Any limitations or conditions attached to a permission must likewise be adhered to. Liability for any existing breach will transfer to the purchaser. It is therefore essential to verify that the current use of the entire property is properly authorised and that all related conditions are being complied with, or to establish whether any unauthorised use or breach has become immune from enforcement. For further information, see Practice Note: Material change of use. Is the use authorised? Confirm the permitted use of the property, or, where relevant, each planning unit, and determine whether that use is authorised by: an explicit planning permission a certificate of lawful use, or permitted development rights If the permitted use does not mirror an express planning permission, do not assume it is unlawful; it may still be authorised by...

This Checklist pinpoints the principal provisions commonly found in a trade mark coexistence agreement. It may serve as a prompt for matters to address when preparing, assessing, or negotiating these arrangements. It can be relied upon as a list of points to review at drafting stage, during review, and throughout negotiations and sign-off process. It may equally be tailored as heads of terms to capture core positions whilst a full trade mark coexistence agreement is finalised. For help on doing so, see Precedent: Heads of terms—commercial contracts. For a model coexistence agreement, see Precedent: Trade mark coexistence agreement. For further detail on factors to weigh when drafting a coexistence agreement, see Practice Notes: Trade mark coexistence agreements and Negotiation guide—trade mark coexistence agreement. Checklist Points to consider Further information Notes (if any) (A) Key commercial considerations ☐ Parties Verify which entities will sign the agreement—specify who owns the trade marks (and related rights) and who is exploiting them. Confirm each party’s legal form and...

This Checklist This Checklist outlines which provisions in a lease and other relevant associated documentation should be carefully examined to ascertain whether a right of light subsists. A right of light is an easement granting a landowner the entitlement to receive natural light through an opening in a building on its land. The owner of the land encumbered by that right (the 'servient Building') must not impede or disturb it without first obtaining consent. For any proposed development, it is therefore essential to identify neighbouring properties that could be enjoying a right of light (the 'dominant Building'). For further information on rights of light, see the following Practice Notes: Establishing and maintaining rights of light Rights of light—obstruction notices Rights of light claims Rights of light—insurance for developers Section 2 of the Prescription Act 1832 (PA 1832) requires actual enjoyment of light, meaning that those with less than a freehold interest can acquire a right of light in their own...

In this issue: Horizon scanning Worker status and categories Immigration Pay Remuneration Taxation Diversity and the gender pay gap Maternity, parents and carers Whistleblowing Data protection and staff information Confidentiality, obligations and restrictions: enforcement Financial services and banking: employment matters Bribery, modern slavery, tax evasion and fraud Issues arising on termination Employment Tribunals Civil courts and alternative dispute resolution Dates for your diary Trackers Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk® Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Horizon scanning Updated Employment Rights Bill to be considered by the House of Lords The updated Employment Rights Bill (ERB), transmitted from the House of Commons to the House of Lords, was issued on 14 March 2025. Its second reading in the House of Lords is scheduled for 27 March 2025...

Risk & Compliance weekly highlights—24 October 2024 In this issue: Data protection and cyber security Financial sanctions AML, CTF & counter-proliferation financing Other financial crime Other Risk & Compliance updates this week Question of the week Daily and weekly news alerts Trackers New and updated content Latest Q&A Data protection and cyber security EAC outlines proposals on the future of UK-EU data adequacy The House of Lords European Affairs Committee (EAC) has sent a letter to the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, capturing the Committee’s key findings and recommendations arising from its inquiry into UK-EU data adequacy. See: LNB News 22/10/2024 111. NCSC publishes advice on communicating during a cyber security incident The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has issued guidance for organisations on managing communications before, during and after a cyber security incident. It identifies three essential principles: prepare a communications plan in advance; communicate clearly...

Hilton Foods Solutions v Wright [2024] EAT 28 What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment turns on a single issue of interpretation: what must an employee do to be treated as having “sought” parental leave so as to gain protection from dismissal under the MAPLE Regulations 1999, SI 1999/3312, reg 20, as enforced by section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996? HHJ Tayler found that whether an individual has “sought” parental leave is a matter for the employment tribunal to decide on the facts, applying the ordinary meaning of the word “sought”, without any special gloss. Serving notice to take parental leave in accordance with paragraphs 1(b) and 3 of Schedule 2 to the MAPLE Regulations will, save in exceptional circumstances, generally show that the employee has “sought” to take parental leave; however, it is not the sole means by which it can be shown that the employee has sought to take parental leave. Accordingly, practitioners should note: employees...

This Resource Note spotlights commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and give practical guidance on applying Chapters 1, 1A, 1B and 1C of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules: DTR 1, DTR 1A, DTR 1B and DTR 1C respectively. Materials referenced here include, where pertinent: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base guidance—Procedural notes and Technical notes (constituting formal guidance and binding on the FCA) FCA consultation papers, discussion papers, policy statements, feedback statements and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications former UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA newsletter List!, where still relevant to interpreting or applying a provision assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where relevant to interpreting a provision Lexis+ UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 1 sets out the Disclosure guidance, explaining its scope and purpose; DTR 1A sets out the transparency rules with their scope and purpose;...

This Practice Note on economic torts This note summarises, at a high level, the key differences when pursuing claims for lawful means conspiracy, unlawful means conspiracy, the tort of unlawful interference, and procuring a breach of contract. Practice Notes: Civil conspiracy claims (economic tort) Lawful means conspiracy (civil action) Unlawful means conspiracy (civil action) Economic tort of unlawful interference The tort of procuring a breach of contract Closely connected to procuring a breach of contract is the so‑called ‘Marex tort’, a cause of action founded on an alleged deliberate infringement by the defendant of the claimant’s rights in a judgment debt; see Practice Note: The Marex tort (interference with a judgment debt). These claims may (though need not) involve a fiduciary or agent, including company directors. For further guidance, see: Claims against directors—key considerations for dispute resolution practitioners Agency disputes Fiduciary Duties Fiduciary duties—remedies for breach Such causes...

People with significant control (PSC) regime The architecture of the people with significant control (PSC) regime, which first commenced on 6 April 2016, is contained in Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Its purpose is to tackle worries about the lack of transparency in corporate ownership, where historically the register captured only the legal holder of shares, not always the beneficial owner. By requiring a PSC register, more precise and up‑to‑date details are available about who ultimately owns and directs companies and other bodies, and this information is made public via the central register at Companies House and remains accessible to the public. It assists prospective investors in their decision‑making. It likewise aids law enforcement bodies with money laundering enquiries. LLPs formed under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 must keep a record of persons with significant control over the LLP under the Limited Liability Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/340 (the LLP Regulations), as amended by the Information about People...

This Licence is entered into on [ insert date ] (the Commencement Date): Parties [ insert licensor name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Licensor); and [ insert licensee name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Licensee), (each of the Licensor and the Licensee being a party and, together, the Licensor and the Licensee are the parties). Background (A) [ Explain the relationship between the Licensor and the Licensee. ] (B) [ The Licensor has entered into an agreement with the Licensee [ dated [ insert date ] ] (the Main Agreement) for [ insert other description of relevant transaction (referencing any relevant related agreements) ] (‘ Transaction ’). ] (C) The Licensor has agreed to...

DATE [ date ] Parties [ name of First Owner ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] ( First Owner ) [ name of Second Owner ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] ( Second Owner ) [ [ name of First Owner’s Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] ( First Owner’s Mortgagee ) ] [ [ name of Second Owner’s Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] ( Second Owner’s Mortgagee ) ] 1 Definitions For this Deed, the terms below shall have these meanings: ...

PLEASE READ THE TERMS OF THIS LICENCE CAREFULLY This legally enforceable agreement is between you (the ‘Licensee’) and us (‘[ INSERT LICENSOR COMPANY NAME ]’, ‘Licensor’, ‘we’ or ‘us’). It grants you a licence (the ‘Licence’) for the [ INSERT NAME OF SOFTWARE (INCLUDING THE VERSION AND LATEST RELEASE NUMBER AND A BRIEF DESCRIPTION IF REQUIRED) ], together with any complimentary Updates, Upgrades, patches, fixes or workarounds issued by the Licensor under this Licence, and all related data, media or documents (collectively, the ‘Software’). For clarity, this Licence does not constitute a sale of the Software; we remain the sole and beneficial owners of the Software at all times. BY SELECTING ‘ACCEPT’ AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS LICENCE, YOU CONFIRM THAT YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS BELOW, WHICH WILL BIND YOU AND ANY AUTHORISED LICENSEES WHEN ACCESSING, DOWNLOADING OR USING THE SOFTWARE. PLEASE PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY SET OUT IN CLAUSE 10. THIS IS A BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS LICENCE AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS. YOU SHOULD...

Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of a Week’s Pay) Regulations 2020 (Week’s Pay Amendment Regs 2020), SI 2020/814 For broader guidance on SI 2020/814, see Practice Note: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme—right to statutory redundancy and other termination payments [Archived]. This resource provides general context on the Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of a Week’s Pay) Regulations 2020 and their application... The Week’s Pay Amendment Regs 2020, SI 2020/814, prescribe how to determine a week’s pay for an employee who is, or has previously been, furloughed under the CJRS. The rules apply when calculating specified payments, including an employee’s entitlement to payment under section 88 or 89 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996). In effect, the instrument clarifies the approach to weekly pay where furlough is relevant, ensuring the correct basis is used for these statutory sums linked to notice or other termination-related payments as identified under the ERA 1996...

From 28 September 2020, where a self-isolating worker is scheduled to work or carry out any other employment-related tasks during the isolation window (aside from working at home or the location where they are isolating), they must inform their employer that they are obliged to self-isolate, providing the start and end dates of that period. This notice must be supplied as soon as reasonably practicable and, in any case, before the worker is next due to commence work within the isolation period...

Under the Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999 (MAPLE 1999), SI 1999/3312 Subject to an earlier start being triggered by childbirth, an employee’s ordinary maternity leave (OML) begins on the earlier of: the date she has told her employer she intends to start maternity leave under the standard notice, or, if changed, the last date she notified—provided the chosen date is not before the start of the eleventh week prior to the expected week of childbirth (EWC) (MAPLE 1999, SI 1999/3312, regs 4(1), 4(1A), 4(2)(b), 6(1)(a)); and the day after the first day she is off work wholly or partly due to pregnancy in the final four weeks before the EWC (MAPLE 1999, SI 1999/3312, reg 6(1)(b)). If she is absent for pregnancy-related reasons at any time in the four weeks before the EWC, OML starts automatically on the day following the first absence. For detail, see ‘When maternity leave periods start’ and ‘Absence in last four weeks before EWC’ in...