Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Relevant discharge terms

Relevant discharge terms meaning

What does Relevant discharge terms mean?
In legal practice, this describes clauses in a certified local authority contract that specify what compensation is payable and how the parties’ rights and liabilities over assets or goods supplied under the contract are adjusted if the contract is discharged (for example, terminated, set aside or frustrated). In England and Wales, the expression is defined by statute: Local Government (Contracts) Act 1997, s 6, which treats “relevant discharge terms” as provisions for compensatory damages or for adjusting rights and liabilities in respect of contractually provided assets or goods. These terms are typically found in PFI/PPP and outsourcing agreements with local authorities and form a core part of the termination and compensation regime, supporting lender and contractor protections by allocating financial consequences on discharge. Their practical significance is to provide a predictable basis for payments and asset treatment if the contract cannot continue, including where public law issues arise affecting enforceability. Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland do not generally use this expression as a defined statutory term; functionally similar termination compensation and asset/transfer provisions are common and are interpreted under general contract law and applicable sector legislation.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Relevant discharge terms

NEWS
Guarantees—construction of ‘Significant Event’ clause: ceasing to be director (including on liquidation) triggers guarantor’s liability—Nirro Holdings SA v O’Brien [2021] EWHC 279 (Ch) (England and Wales)

Nirro Holdings SA v Patrick O’Brien [2021] EWHC 279 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision illustrates how the court approaches construing contracts, and in particular how guarantees are read. The judge reviewed the general authorities on interpretation, examined the precise language of the guarantee signed by the surety, and assessed the situations that would engage an obligation to discharge the company’s liabilities as though the guarantor were the primary debtor. In Kookmin Bank v Rainy Sky SA [2011] UKSC 50 (at para [21]), Lord Clarke explained that construction is a single, integrated exercise: the court considers the words chosen and determines what a reasonable person — equipped with the background knowledge reasonably available to the parties at the time — would have taken them to mean. The court must take account of all relevant context. Where two readings are open, the court may prefer the interpretation that accords with business common sense and reject the rival reading. It weighed the factual matrix surrounding the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Relevant discharge terms

PRACTICE NOTES
Discharge of Contractual Obligations under English Law: Performance, Substantial Performance, Time of the Essence; Actual and Anticipatory Breach, Conditions, Warranties and Innominate Terms, Election, Affirmation, Termination Risks and Variation

Introduction This Practice Note forms part of our LLB Contract Law series, carefully tailored with law students in mind. It examines the doctrine governing the discharge of obligations, with particular attention to discharge by performance and by breach, setting these within the wider context of contractual termination. It considers the thresholds for valid performance, such as strict compliance, substantial performance, entire versus divisible obligations, and the importance of time clauses where relevant. It then assesses breach of contract in its forms (actual and anticipatory) and identifies when breach is grave enough to justify termination by the innocent party, with close treatment of conditions, warranties, and innominate terms. The Practice Note also tackles the doctrine of election, the perils of wrongful termination, and the effects of acceptance in sale of goods contracts. Throughout, it weaves in leading authorities and statutory rules to show how the law mediates certainty with fairness. By blending doctrinal exposition with judicial reasoning and critical perspective, the Practice Note aims to equip students with the analytical...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Trade effluent consents and agreements under the Water Industry Act 1991: compliance, offences, sewerage undertaker duties and Ofwat appeals (England and Wales)

Compliance, enforcement and offences Owner or occupier of trade premises It is an offence, carrying on summary conviction a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, and on conviction on indictment an unlimited fine, to: discharge trade effluent from trade premises without a consent or agreement issued under the Water Industry Act 1991 (WIA 1991) breach any conditions attached to such a consent or agreement See Practice Notes: Trade effluent consents and agreements—when are they required? and Trade effluent consents and agreements—applications for further details on when and how to apply for a trade effluent consent or agreement. Agreements are enforceable between the contracting parties—namely the owner occupier of the relevant trade premises and the sewerage undertaker—insofar as they concern private contractual obligations, eg adopting a pipeline. However, to discharge trade effluent in breach of the terms of the agreement is an offence punishable on summary conviction by a fine...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Negotiating service agreements for occupational pension scheme advisers: statutory appointment requirements, benchmarks, delegation, liability caps, indemnities, termination and fees

THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES TO REGISTERED OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES Given the intricacies of contemporary pensions law and scheme administration, it is little surprise that trustees of occupational pension schemes typically engage professional advisers to help them discharge their responsibilities. In addition, trustees of most registered arrangements are under a legal duty to appoint specified professional advisers, though certain schemes are excluded from these duties, depending on the character of the relevant pension scheme. For more information, see Appointing pension professional advisers and other service providers. Types of professional advisers Professionals commonly engaged in connection with (defined benefit) occupational pension schemes include: scheme auditor scheme actuary fund manager custodian of assets legal adviser Strictly, there is no statutory obligation on trustees of registered pension schemes to appoint legal advisers; however, where any individual is appointed as a legal adviser by someone other than the trustees and the trustees rely on that person’s skill or judgement, the trustees may...

Read More Right Arrow