Relevant income meaning

Tax consequences of different buyback structures The table below offers a concise overview of the tax outcomes arising from the various forms of share buyback that a UK company may undertake. Throughout, it is assumed that the relevant shareholder is UK resident and that the repurchased shares are held as an investment. For fuller guidance on the tax treatment of share buybacks, see the following Practice Notes: Tax consequences of share buybacks—main rules Tax consequences of share buybacks—calculating the income capital split Tax consequences of share buybacks—unquoted trading companies For a comparative table setting out other ways a company can return value to shareholders, together with the principal UK tax issues for each route, see: Key UK tax considerations for returning value to shareholders—comparative table. Note that tailored provisions apply where the company repurchasing its shares is a qualifying asset holding company. For more on this, refer to Practice Note: Qualifying asset holding companies (QAHCs)—tax treatment...

This quick-reference checklist supports calculating whether an applicant meets the relevant thresholds for eligibility under family immigration routes. It specifically helps with reviewing both the main financial requirement and the adequate maintenance requirement for routes under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules... Which financial requirement applies? New application from 11 April 2024: £29,000 Renewal or extension from 11 April 2024 (including fiancés converting to partner): £18,600 (plus applicant child increment, capped at £29,000) Pending application made before 11 April 2024: £18,600 (plus applicant child increment, no cap) Sponsoring applicant in receipt of a specified benefit or applying on a specified route (e.g. as a parent): Adequate maintenance based on current income support rates (see below) Where applicable, child increments are: +£3,800 for the first child and +£2,400 for each extra child; e.g. +1 child = £22,400, +2 children = £24,800, +3 children = £27,200, and +4 children = £29,600 (unless capped at £29,000). British children and those with leave under...

This Practice Note serves as an initial guide to listing debt securities on the London Stock Exchange (LSE). It outlines the ideas of listing and admission to trading, and centres on the main markets for listing debt instruments. It does not aim to detail every applicable requirement and provides links to relevant resources for further reading. It also excludes disclosure requirements and ongoing continuing obligations. Principal markets for debt securities listings The LSE operates several markets, but the venues commonly used for debt capital market listings are: the Main Market the International Securities Market (ISM) the Professional Securities Market (PSM) (Note: From 19 January 2026, the PSM is closed to new admissions) In addition, the LSE runs two markets tailored to particular segments of the debt securities space: the Order book for Fixed Income Securities (OFIS) the Sustainable Bond Market Listing or admission to trading––what is the difference? ‘Listing’ means admission of...

Original News Anderson v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 0565 (TC) What was the case about? In his tax return, Mr Anderson sought £3m of relief under sections 64 and 72 ITA 2007, claiming losses from trading activities labelled ‘football development’. He had put funds into the Bafana soccer academy in South Africa, created to cultivate emerging football talent and generate income through the profitable transfer of successful players. HMRC issued a discovery assessment, asserting the losses did not stem from a trade conducted on a commercial basis with a view to profit, and that the predominant purpose of the activity was to secure a tax advantage. Why did the appellant dispute the validity of the discovery assessment? The appellant’s central challenge was that there had been no ‘discovery’. At the point the assessment was raised, HMRC, he said, lacked reasonable grounds to believe Mr Anderson had been under-assessed, as it did not possess adequate information to support such a conclusion at the relevant time. In particular, the...

In this issue: Company law and regulatory matters Corporate governance Tax treatment Useful information Trackers Dates for your diary Weekly highlights from other practice areas Company law and regulatory matters Companies (Directors’ Remuneration and Audit) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 published The Companies (Directors’ Remuneration and Audit) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (SI 2025/439) have been issued and will take effect on 11 May 2025, having previously been laid for sifting last month (see News Analysis: Share Incentives weekly highlights—6 March 2025—Company law and regulatory matters). They remove most of the 2019 reporting obligations imposed on quoted companies in relation to directors’ remuneration, introduced to implement aspects of EU Directive 2017/828 (the revised Shareholder Rights Directive). This change reflects substantial overlap with pre‑2019 UK rules on directors’ pay reporting that remain in force and continue to apply. The instrument also updates the audit regulatory framework to address inconsistencies identified by the government and the Financial Reporting Council, which arose during...

In this issue: Probate Elderly and vulnerable clients Spouses, civil partners and cohabitants UK taxes for Private Client HMRC Manuals updates Budgets and Finance Bills Digital assets and cryptoassets International Question of the week Additional Private Client updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis®PSL community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Useful information Probate Court Funds Office reduces special and basic accounts interest rate Effective 12 June 2024, the Court Funds Office lowered interest across special and basic accounts. Rates on special accounts shifted from 6.00% to 5.25%, while basic accounts dropped from 5.00% to 3.94%. See LNB News 16/07/2024 55. For a roundup of key rates relevant to Private Client work, refer to Practice Note: Key interest rates—Private Client. Elderly and vulnerable clients Discrimination challenge over social care charging policy (R (YVR (a...

This tracker captures legislation taking effect in 2026, arranged in chronological order. Updates are published on a month-by-month basis throughout the year, and links to relevant news reports are included where appropriate. For legislation commencing later in 2026, see Practice Note: Legislation tracker—Employment. For measures in force prior to 2026, refer to these Practice Notes: Archived—2025 Legislation tracker—Employment Archived—2024 Legislation tracker—Employment Archived—2023 Legislation tracker—Employment Archived—2022 Employment horizon scanner—dates for your diary Legislation in force—January 2026 Commencement date (unless otherwise indicated) Legislative change 6 January 2026 Exclusivity clauses—protections for low-income and zero hours workers Section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025) widens the current protections to apply to all zero hours arrangements, whether contractual or not, and covers any restriction on taking work elsewhere. Any such term is void and unenforceable...

ARCHIVED : This Practice Note is archived and is no longer maintained. From 1 April 2017, the worldwide debt cap rules were repealed and superseded by the corporate interest restriction (CIR) rules. Accordingly, the worldwide debt cap described here should be treated as relevant only for periods before 1 April 2017, being the date the CIR took effect. For any period straddling that date, the debt cap should be applied to a notional period ending on 31 March 2017. For more on the CIR, which replaces and repeals the debt cap, see Practice Note: Corporate interest restriction. Relief for finance costs of UK-resident companies that are members of large groups may be restricted (ie disallowed) where, broadly, the group’s UK-based net debt exceeds 75% of the group’s gross debt (the gateway test). The debt cap applies to periods of account beginning on or after 1 January 2010. The provisions that bring about the restriction are often termed the worldwide debt cap regime (although it is possible that the regime...

Introduction and context This Practice Note provides a summary of the taxation of internationally mobile employees in relation to securities options (Options) charged to tax within Chapter 5 of Part 7 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003). On 30 October 2024, as part of the Autumn Budget 2024 announcements, the Labour government confirmed that it would proceed with the former Conservative government’s plans to abolish the remittance basis of taxation and replace it with a residence‑based regime, scheduled to commence on 6 April 2025. These changes were enacted through Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025) and have also affected, in particular, the availability and operation of overseas workday relief. This Practice Note reflects the current position under the new tax regime; however, the previous regime is still relevant for Options granted before 6 April 2025, because any elements of the Options’ ‘relevant period’ (see discussion below—broadly, the vesting period) that occur before 6 April 2025 remain subject to certain aspects of the earlier rules. For...

Introduction The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA 2017), effective in the UK since 2017, establishes a corporate offence for failing to stop the criminal facilitation of tax evasion. Tax evasion means unlawfully not paying, or paying less than, the taxes due. It commonly occurs through non-declaration or false declaration of liabilities to the appropriate tax authority. Tax evasion is a criminal offence. Responsibility may arise for an individual, for example in respect of income tax or VAT, or for a corporate body, for instance regarding corporation tax. Enclosed, for your review and approval, is a [ n updated ] [ Group ] policy on preventing the facilitation of tax evasion. This policy, which covers all of our businesses, opens with a brief message from [ insert name of relevant individual ] underlining its significance and calling for the personal commitment of every member of staff to put it into practice. It has received formal approval from [ insert name of relevant individual and/or team ]...

This Agreement is made on [ insert date ] Parties [ Insert Employer’s name ], whose registered office is at [ insert Employer’s address ], company registration number [ insert Employer’s company number ] (Employer); [ Insert Employee’s name ] of [ insert Employee’s address ] (you). The parties agree: Termination of employment 1.1 Your employment with the Employer [ will terminate OR terminated ] owing to [ insert reason for termination ] on [ insert date ] (Termination Date). 1.2 For the period up to and including the Termination Date, you [ will be OR have been ] paid your accrued basic salary (less deductions for income tax and primary class 1 (employee) National Insurance contributions ( PAYE Deductions )) and [ will have OR have ] received your contractual benefits [ , including a payment of £[ insert amount ] in respect of [ insert number ] days’ accrued but untaken holiday entitlement ] [...

Key points Residence determines the scope of a person’s liability to UK income tax and capital gains tax (CGT). An individual’s tax residence is established under the Statutory Residence Test (SRT). A person can be tax resident in multiple countries at the same time, as each jurisdiction applies its own domestic rules. Someone who is not resident in the UK is taxed only on UK‑source income and on certain gains from disposing of UK assets, including residential property. Value added tax (VAT), stamp duty land tax (SDLT) and the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) may apply to both residents and non‑residents. Before 6 April 2025, domicile—rather than residence—was the principal factor in determining exposure to inheritance tax (IHT). From 6 April 2025, IHT liability is largely linked to the period an individual has been resident in the UK. Residence of individuals—summary An individual’s UK tax residence is relevant when determining liability to income tax and CGT. Those...

IR35 The off-payroll IR35 framework applies where: from 6 April 2017, the engager is a public authority; and from 6 April 2020, a private sector organisation (other than one that is ‘small’) hires a worker via an intermediary, for example a personal service company (PSC). The legislation takes effect in respect of payments made on or after those dates, even where such payments relate to services delivered before those dates. This applies without regard to precisely when the work was performed. In essence, and in practical terms, the off-payroll IR35 rules move the task of deciding whether IR35 applies from the PSC to the end client in relevant cases and, where IR35 does apply, they place the duty to deduct income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) on the party nearest to the PSC in the contractual chain (whether that is the end client contracting directly with the PSC, or another intermediary within more complicated contractual structures). IR35 is engaged...

The appropriate section of the HMRC annual return to complete hinges on whether the relevant share appreciation right (SAR) or restricted stock unit (RSU) constitutes a securities option for the purposes of s 420(8) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. In both scenarios, the award counts as a securities option if it grants a legal entitlement to obtain shares, and this, in turn, is determined in practice by the precise terms of the award concerning the method by which settlement may actually occur...

Much will turn on the exact provisions settled between the parties; for example, whether the essential component of child maintenance was set as a fixed sum with no top‑up payable at the time of the initial order because, at that stage, the payer’s earnings did not cross the relevant threshold. It will also matter whether, when that basic maintenance figure was determined, a 50/50 shared care regime was already in place and operating from the outset. The calculation used in the order appears to mirror the approach endorsed by Mostyn J in CB v KB, particularly at paragraph [49], where he indicated that in any case in which the non‑resident parent’s gross annual income does not exceed £650,000, the starting benchmark should be the output of the formula, disregarding the cap on gross annual income set at £156,000...