Representation meaning

Key reading for lawyers attending s 2 interviews The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is empowered to compel interviews with persons thought to hold information pertinent to an investigation, by issuing a notice under section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (section 2 interviews). For comprehensive guidance on this power and the practical issues it creates, refer to: Interviews under the Criminal Justice Act 1987, s 2 For additional resources relevant to attending interviews under caution and those conducted at the police station, see: Attendance at the police station—checklist Attendance at a corporate crime interview under caution—checklist As the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) does not apply to s 2 interviews, there is therefore no statutory right for an interviewee to have legal representation. It is consequently vital that criminal practitioners are familiar with the SFO guidance for lawyers: section 2 interviews...

This Checklist sets out essential steps for arbitrators to consider when deploying artificial intelligence (‘AI’) tools, or where AI is involved in arbitral proceedings. Given the fast‑moving nature of the technology and the applicable laws and regulations, please be aware that this is not a comprehensive list and should be treated as such. The Checklist is intended to provide guidance on best practice. Understanding AI Key points Notes Definition of AI Artificial intelligence refers to computer systems’ capacity to exhibit human‑like cognitive functions, such as decision‑making, planning, reasoning and knowledge representation. IBM characterises AI as technology that allows computers and machines to emulate human learning, understanding, problem‑solving, decision‑making, creativity and autonomy. WIPO portrays AI as a branch of computer science focused on building machines and systems capable of performing tasks thought to require human intelligence. Machine learning and deep learning are two branches within AI. In recent years, with advances in neural network methods and hardware, AI is commonly regarded as...

Estate of [insert name of deceased] Clients: [insert names of executors/administrators] File reference: [insert file ref] The details requested in this questionnaire are needed for the application for a grant of representation. Please complete what you can, and also gather the death certificate together with any documents and passbooks, as asked for within this questionnaire. A Personal details of the deceased Copy death certificate enclosed YES / NO 1 State the courtesy title (Mr, Mrs, etc) and any professional title (eg Dr) 1.1 Provide the deceased’s full name 1.2 Provide any alternative name or names by which they were known 2 Occupation of the deceased 2.1 Was the deceased retired? YES / NO 2.2 National Insurance number 2.3 Unique taxpayer reference; please attach income tax papers 3 A Give the address of the nursing or care home (only if this was the deceased’s last address; otherwise leave blank) 3.1 B Provide the deceased’s usual...

The following flowchart Outlines the principal stages of estate administration, beginning with initial contact from a personal representative or a relative of the deceased, proceeding to the submission for a grant of representation, and concluding with the finalisation and closure of the matter within the file itself...

In Scotland, minor offences are pursued via a summary complaint. The summary process is governed by Part IX of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995...

The flow diagram outlines when an executor might renounce probate, the effects this has on administering the estate, and which other individuals may apply for a grant instead, in their place. It also additionally covers the circumstance in which a proving sole, or sole-surviving, executor dies, and explains how the chain of representation interacts with renunciation by their own executor(s). If one of several appointed executors dies after obtaining a grant, but there remain surviving, proving executors named in that grant, those executors will carry on acting...

Representation of Zedra Trust Company (Suisse) SA re C and D Trusts [2023] JRC 213 What are the practical implications of this case Although resolved on its own facts, the court offered broadly useful guidance for trustees managing dynastic trusts intended to support multiple generations. As a family’s philosophy evolves, trustees should assess whether the trust still embodies that shift and, if not, consider whether substantive modifications are required. The ruling will interest practitioners as it confronts public policy and human rights considerations within the framework of trust deed provisions and settlors’ expressed wishes. It underlines that letters of wishes are not binding on trustees, and certainly not on the court, and demonstrates judicial backing for a trustee departing from a settlor’s clear wishes to prevent family discord, here arising from the exclusion of the female line from benefitting from the Trusts. In short, the decision encourages trustees of long‑running family trusts to think carefully about alignment with changing family...

Collins and others v Wind Energy Holding Ltd [2025] EWHC 40 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling reinforces the formidable threshold that section 68 challenges must clear. Section 68 functions as a longstop safeguard for cases where a tribunal has seriously mishandled the arbitration in one of the ways identified in section 68(2). Court intervention is reserved for situations that are far removed from what could reasonably be expected of the arbitral process. The judgment also reconciles section 33 duties: on one side, ensuring each party a fair chance to put its case and answer the other’s arguments; on the other, preventing unnecessary delay or expense. Whether a tribunal has discharged these obligations is a context-specific question in every matter. It is a stringent standard, triggered by exceptional departures from proper process. The inquiry is fact-sensitive and context‑dependent. Here, the court found the claimants had adequate opportunity to address issues concerning the freezing order and to obtain legal representation, yet made no genuine...

See Q&A: If a last surviving executor dies after probate has been granted, but there are executors who reserved power to apply for a double grant of probate, who will continue the administration of the estate? Under section 7(1) of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925), the person who is executor to a sole, or to the final surviving, executor of a testator is treated as the testator’s executor. This principle is known as the chain of representation...

The public sector equality duty (PSED) Set out in Part 11 of the Equality Act 2010 (ss 149–159), the public sector equality duty (PSED) comprises a general equality duty applying UK-wide to public bodies listed in Schedule 19 of the EqA 2010, alongside specific duties intended to support delivery of the general duty and enhance transparency. Although the general duty is identical across England, Wales and Scotland, the specific duties made under EqA 2010, s 153 vary. In Wales, listed public bodies must meet particular specific duties that sit alongside the UK-wide general duty. These specific duties bind listed Welsh bodies only. They do not extend to non-devolved public authorities operating in Wales. Under EqA 2010, s 149, the general duty requires public authorities and those exercising public functions to have 'due regard' to the need to: eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and any other behaviour prohibited by or under the EqA 2010 advance equality of opportunity between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and...

This Practice Note This Practice Note outlines how the family courts address questions of capacity and the methods for assessing it, including the use of expert opinion. Within family proceedings, capacity is pertinent both to a person's ability to litigate and to settle proceedings, such as by agreeing a consent order. The focus is chiefly on an adult's capacity, or on cases where a 16–17 year old is involved in the proceedings and is expected to lack the necessary decision-making capacity on reaching 18. For matters concerning children's representation, see also Practice Note: Children as parties to public law proceedings. Broader issues about capacity in the context of family relationships are addressed in Practice Note: Capacity to marry, cohabit and have sexual relations. In Richardson-Ruhan v Ruhan, Mostyn J observed that a person's capacity to run proceedings is not contingent on receiving legal advice (whether sound or poor); if, with the benefit of advice, they would be able to take the required decisions, they have capacity, regardless of whether...

This Practice Note provides an introduction to the overall structure of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules (the UNCITRAL Rules). The UNCITRAL Rules occupy a significant role in contemporary arbitration practice. They are crafted for ad hoc international commercial arbitrations—proceedings not administered by an arbitral institution and, typically, not conducted under that institution’s rules. The Rules may likewise be employed in investor–state arbitrations commenced under a treaty, such as a bilateral investment treaty, where the treaty permits arbitration conducted under those rules. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the UNCITRAL Rules govern arbitration agreements concluded on or after 15 August 2010, ie the date the revised Rules took effect. The earlier 1976 UNCITRAL Rules continue to apply to all arbitration agreements entered into before that date. Both the 1976 and 2010 UNCITRAL Rules are separate from UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, adopted in 1985 and revised in 2006, which has been adopted (often with modifications) by more than 50 jurisdictions—see Practice Note: The UNCITRAL...

[ Insert organisation name ] is proud of how we conduct our business. Our Code of ethics sets out the standards and policies that govern our operations and applies to everyone. Please read the Code carefully, make sure you understand it, and use it to guide your work. If you have any queries about the Code or its application, please speak with [ insert contact details ]. 1 What is fraud? 1.1 In broad terms, fraud is a criminal act involving deception or theft to secure an advantage. 1.2 The failure to prevent fraud offence under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) covers a wide range of fraud offences carried out for the benefit of our organisation, including: fraud by false representation fraud by failing to disclose information fraud by abuse of position obtaining services dishonestly participation in a fraudulent business false statements by company directors false accounting fraudulent trading cheating the...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: The government intends to levy inheritance tax on unspent pension pots upon death, effective from 6 April 2027. For further details, please see the News Analysis item: HMRC confirms new IHT rules on unused pension funds to apply from 6 April 2027...

1 Definitions Authorised Recipients: directors/senior managers; your agents/advisers; and any funders. Confidential Information: all data on the Property from Seller discussions; plus the existence, nature and progress of negotiations and this letter. 2 Undertakings Use only to assess the Property/Transaction; keep it confidential; disclose solely to Authorised Recipients; discuss only with the Seller; do not enter or inspect; brief recipients and ensure compliance; return, destroy and delete on request or if the deal ends; do not seek any commercial advantage. 3 Exceptions Information public at disclosure; later public or lawfully obtained; or disclosure required by law/regulator with prompt notice. 4 Representations and warranties No representation or warranty; you must rely on your own judgement; fraud excepted. 5 Offer and duration Not an offer or contract; Seller may cease providing information. 6 Costs No reimbursement unless agreed...

In numerous matters, one or both sides in a legal dispute appear without lawyers, representing themselves in the proceedings. This occurs for a range of reasons; frequently, the cause is an inability to obtain legal representation because of limited personal finances. Every section of the legal profession, under its respective code of conduct and in line with its duties to the court, is obliged to treat litigants in person with fairness and respect. In addition, the Judicial College Guidance offers further direction to the judiciary on the role of the judge when a case features a litigant in person within proceedings of this kind...

An unincorporated association is not a legal entity In principle, it lacks legal personality and therefore cannot bring or face proceedings in its own name; this was the stance in London Association for Protection of Trade v Greenlands Limited. The position was examined in detail in Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v Broughton, a matter arising from a campaign by the Animal Liberation Front and related bodies. The conventional course is to seek a representation order, allowing a named member or office-holder to be joined as a party ‘on behalf of the members of the association’. Yet time pressures—particularly an approaching limitation deadline—may make obtaining such an order impracticable, prompting a prospective claimant to ask whether the association can be joined in its own name. As recorded in University of Oxford, there have been instances where the court has in fact made orders directly against an association. Several first‑instance rulings placed before the court show orders made against protest groups which have been...

Proportional representation of political groups Authorities and committees must apportion seats to mirror the proportional make-up of political groups. The issue is whether an independent member, meaning one not belonging to any party group, can be placed on the planning committee. The position depends in part on the facts and the authority’s constitution, but where the authority is organised into political groups and no statutory exceptions apply, an independent would need to form a group with at least one other member to gain representation and thus a seat on the planning committee. In some authorities, several independents join to create an independent group, sometimes called ‘the independents’, and are therefore entitled to representation on the planning committee. This rule does not extend to area committees, and authorities may disapply it if unanimously approved alternative arrangements are adopted. This all proceeds on the basis that the authority is a ‘relevant authority’ as defined in section 21 and Schedule 1 to the Local Government and Housing Act 1989 (LGHA 1989)...