Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Representations

Representations meaning

What does Representations mean?
In legal practice, a representation is a pre‑contractual statement of present or past fact (which may include a statement of law) made to induce another to enter a contract. It can be oral, written or implied from words or conduct; mere silence is usually insufficient, but half‑truths, a change of circumstances, or a duty to disclose (for example, in fiduciary or certain insurance contexts) can make non‑disclosure actionable. Statements of opinion or intention are not generally representations unless they imply underlying facts or are made without reasonable grounds. Actionable misrepresentation requires a false statement that is material, addressed to the claimant, and which actually induces reliance. Remedies include rescission and damages: fraudulent misrepresentation (deceit) and negligent misrepresentation typically attract reliance‑based damages putting the claimant as if the representation had not been made. In England & Wales and Northern Ireland, these remedies are shaped by the Misrepresentation Act 1967; Ireland has a similar Misrepresentation Act 1967. Scots law proceeds mainly by common law (error, reduction and delict), without a direct statutory equivalent. In contracts, “representations and warranties” allocate risk. Entire agreement and non‑reliance clauses may limit misrepresentation claims, subject to statutory controls on unfair terms and reasonableness. Usage is broadly consistent across the...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Representations

CHECKLISTS
English law LMA par secondary loan trades: pre-trade due diligence and settlement guide (transfer criteria, RFR/IBOR interest and DSC, KYC, tax, regulatory, sub-participations, BISO)

STOP PRESS The Loan Market Association (LMA) has released refreshed editions of the standard terms and conditions for Par and Distressed Trade Transactions, the complete set of Funded Participation and Risk Participation Agreements, and the Secondary Debt Trading Documentation User Guide, with effect from 17 March 2026. The changes remove LIBOR references, update IBOR rate definitions and the Target2 definition, and revise ERISA representations to incorporate additional exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules under ERISA and the US Internal Revenue Code. The revised documentation is available exclusively to LMA members, accessible via the LMA’s Documentation Hub. These publications are updated versions issued by the LMA. Summary A core principle of trading under the LMA protocol is that ‘Trade is a Trade’; i.e. once a trade is struck—including an oral contract agreed by telephone—it is binding, and subsequent developments, even if adverse to one or both parties, do not entitle either party to cancel or ‘break’ the trade. By way of example, a failure to secure consent for...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Cash forfeiture hearing procedure in the magistrates’ court (POCA 2002 s 298)—practitioners’ checklist

Checklist This checklist sets out the stages that may arise at a magistrates’ court hearing of a complaint seeking the forfeiture of cash under section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. For more detailed guidance on the cash forfeiture process, see Practice Note: Forfeiture of cash by court order. Any person who has been given notice of the application may attend the hearing and make representations The application is treated as a complaint, so the applicant is the ‘complainant’ and the respondent is the ‘defendant’...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Buyer-side B2B goods and services supply contracts: comprehensive practitioner checklist for review and negotiation

This Checklist outlines the main points to consider when assessing contracts or terms and conditions for buying goods or services between two businesses (ie a B2B contract). It applies to reviews of standard supply terms and bespoke supply arrangements. It is prepared from the viewpoint of the buyer, namely the customer/purchaser. For general guidance on buying or supplying goods and services, see: Sale and supply of goods—overview and Supply of services—overview Reviewing terms for the purchase of goods or services as a buyer—business to business Preliminary considerations for a buyer of goods or services Recitals and representations Does the agreement contain an opening section setting out the buyer’s overarching aims and any statements by the seller about its capability to deliver the goods and services? Further information: Precedent: Background clause; Practice Note: Misrepresentations—excluding and limiting liability for them ☐ Existing restrictions and permissions Have you verified whether any prior arrangements, for example restrictive covenants or exclusive purchasing commitments, would stop you entering into the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Representations

NEWS
Corporate Crime Weekly: sanctions challenges, sentencing changes, FCA/SFO priorities, AML reforms, and legislative, enforcement and procedural updates—21 March 2024

In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Criminal procedure and evidence Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Local authority prosecutions Money laundering International Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Refusal to repurpose evidence in civil proceedings for criminal charging decision (WFZ v British Broadcasting Corp) The High Court has recently clarified the circumstances in which a party will be permitted to rely on witness statements outside the proceedings in which they were first served. In ongoing injunction proceedings aimed at stopping publication of a BBC investigative report into sexual abuse allegations, the court determined that the accused could not use sensitive excerpts from that report in representations to the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Measure of damages: breach of warranty v misrepresentation in a law firm sale; continuing representations and assessing loss absent valuation evidence—Karim v Wemyss, Court of Appeal (England and Wales)

Practical implications This judgment: offers a clear and carefully set out account (with hypothetical examples) of the difference between how damages are assessed in contract and in tort underlines the importance of ensuring that suitable and necessary valuation evidence is put before the court for determination. Although the absence of such evidence did not prevent the court from arriving at a damages figure payable for breach of warranty, the task would have been more straightforward had that material been placed before the court, and it is ordinarily sensible to make sure it is hints at the potential value, in claims of this type, of pleading both damages for breach of warranty and, where the facts allow, an alternative tort claim for misrepresentation (especially if fraudulent). In this matter, however, it was the contractual warranty claim that enabled Mr Karim to recover What was the breach of warranty claim? Mr Wemyss sold his business (a law practice) to Mr Karim under...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Lonham Group Ltd v Scotbeef Ltd: Court of Appeal on warranties v representations, fair presentation, conditions precedent and contracting out under the Insurance Act 2015 (England and Wales)

Lonham Group Ltd v Scotbeef Ltd & another [2025] EWCA Civ 203 Traditionally, English insurance law placed onerous burdens on insured parties: they were required to reveal every material circumstance capable of affecting the judgment of a prudent insurer when setting the premium or determining whether to accept the risk. If they did not, the insurer could treat the policy as though it never existed. Likewise, any failure to comply with a warranty discharged the insurer from liability under the policy, regardless of the warranty’s relevance to the risk and irrespective of whether the breach was later remedied. In the early development of insurance, these severe rules were arguably justified by the informational imbalance between insured and insurer. By the twenty-first century, however, a more sophisticated market generated pressure for reform. For non-consumer insurance, the result was IA 2015, which marked a substantial change in approach. The previous duty of disclosure was replaced by a duty of fair presentation, and only in defined circumstances could an...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Representations

PRACTICE NOTES
ISDA Master Agreements (1992/2002) and Schedules: Single Agreement, Flawed Asset, Close-out Netting, Representations, Events of Default, Termination, Tax, Undertakings, Governing Law and Jurisdiction

What does this Practice Note cover? This Practice Note outlines the principal provisions that apply to both the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency—Cross Border) (the 1992 Agreement) and the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement (the 2002 Agreement), together with their accompanying schedules. Unless indicated otherwise, any reference here to the master agreements (the ISDA master agreement) should be read as a reference to both the 1992 and 2002 Agreements. For a comparison of the two forms, see Practice Note: ISDA documentation—comparison of the 1992 and 2002 master agreements; for the broader ISDA documentation framework, see Practice Note: Derivatives—ISDA documentation framework. The key concepts underpinning the ISDA master agreement The ISDA master agreement rests on three core concepts, outlined briefly below: single agreement flawed asset close-out netting Single agreement Under ISDA’s documentation architecture, every derivative transaction between a pair of counterparties is captured under one overarching agreement (implemented through multiple layers of documentation), as provided in Section 1(c) of the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK Prudential Regulation Authority supervisory intervention and enforcement: statutory notices, decision-making committees (including EDMC), hearings and Upper Tribunal references under FSMA 2000, and securitisation enforcement powers

This Practice Note This Practice Note sets out how the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) conducts its formal administrative procedures under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000), with particular emphasis on Part XXVI (Notices), alongside the PRA’s statements of policy and procedure for reaching decisions... Outcomes may involve supervisory steps—such as varying or imposing requirements—or formal enforcement, including a public censure or a financial penalty, directed at PRA‑authorised firms or individuals... It explains the PRA’s decision‑making routes for issuing statutory notices under FSMA 2000, namely: Supervisory Notices Warning Notices Decision Notices Final Notices Notices of Discontinuance The Note also sets out how subjects can make representations, including orally, at a hearing before PRA decision‑making bodies such as the Supervision, Risk and Policy Committee (SRPC) or the Enforcement Decision Making Committee (EDMC)... The Securitisation Regulation 2024 (SI 2024/102) broadened the PRA’s enforcement remit to cover firms engaged in securitisation that are not PRA‑authorised. Under the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Term Loan B facilities: structure, key documentation points, European differences from traditional senior loans, evolving covenants, transfer restrictions, and the implications of Kirschner v JP Morgan Chase

This Practice Note looks at Term Loan B (TLB) facilities, which often feature as a senior tranche within syndicated loans in leveraged financings. TLBs are long-established in the US market and are increasingly seen in the European lending market for institutional investors. It examines the structure of a typical TLB and how it diverges from traditional European leveraged loans, before setting out the key features. This Practice Note assumes some understanding of leveraged finance. For introductory information, see: Introductory guide to acquisition finance. For explanations of common terms, see Practice Note: Glossary of acquisition finance terms and jargon. What is a Term Loan B? In lending markets, ‘Term Loan B’ or ‘TLB’ (short for Term Loan Bullet) describes a tranche of senior secured credit facilities made available to a borrower and intended to be syndicated in the institutional loan market. They are usually floating-rate term facilities with an actual or implied non-investment grade rating, a five to seven year maturity and either nominal amortisation of 1% per annum...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Representations

PRECEDENTS
Precedent Sterling term loan facility agreement (bilateral) for single corporate borrower, with optional security and/or parent guarantee (England and Wales)

This Agreement, dated [ • ] 20[ • ], is entered into between the following parties: Parties [ insert name of Borrower ], a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Borrower); and [ insert name of Lender ] of [ insert address ] (the Lender). Background (A) [ insert description of background to transaction ]. (B) The Lender has agreed to provide the Facility (as defined below) to the Borrower on the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Buyer-favourable warranty and tax covenant limitations schedule for corporate seller SPAs: periods, caps, de minimis, specific exclusions, claims conduct, third-party recoveries and mitigation

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed • means information [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] and presented with sufficient clarity and detail to allow a buyer to reach a clear, informed and accurate evaluation of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances concerned; Losses • means any and all liabilities, costs, outgoings (including legal expenses), claims, actions, proceedings, damages, fines, penalties, loss of profit [ and Consequential Loss ]; Tax Warranties • denotes the warranties [ and representations ] contained in paragraph [ insert number ] of Schedule [ insert number ], and Tax Warranty refers to any one of them; Warranties • signifies the warranties [ and representations ] included in Schedule [...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Borrower’s Solicitors’ Completion Undertaking to Lender’s Solicitors: Commercial Property Purchase and First Legal Charge (England and Wales)

TO BE PRINTED ON THE BORROWER’S SOLICITORS’ HEADED PAPER To: [ insert details of the lender’s solicitors ] (the Lender’s Solicitors) and [ insert details of the lender ] (the Lender) Dear [ insert organisation name ] Completion undertaking This undertaking concerns the acquisition of [ insert property description ] (the Property) by [ insert borrower’s name ] (the Borrower) under a sale contract dated [ insert date ] between [ insert seller’s name ] (the Seller) and the Borrower (the Sale Contract), together with the grant of a first legal charge over the Property in favour of the Lender pursuant to a facility agreement dated [ insert date ] between [ insert details ] (the Facility Agreement). For the purposes of this letter, ‘completion’ means completion of the Transfer of the Property to the Borrower (the Transfer), and does not include registration of the Transfer at HM Land Registry. We are instructed by the Borrower. We enclose: ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Representations

Q&As
Tier 5 (GAE) Educational Sponsors: Reporting Leave Breaches—Home Office & Representations

Monitoring and reporting migrant activity Under the heading Monitoring and reporting migrant activity, Practice Note, Sponsor duties under Tiers 2 and 5 and adapting human resources systems, confirms that a report must be submitted via the SMS within ten working days whenever a sponsor holds any information indicating that a sponsored...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
After LPA quashes permission for neighbour notice failure: notify all neighbours or only those omitted?

Before reaching a decision on a planning application, a local planning authority (LPA) must run a consultation period to gather opinions on the proposed development. This encompasses public consultation. It is open to all members of the public, who may submit representations. To make that process work, the LPA is required to publicise the planning applications it receives. Statutory provisions Section 65 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) enables a development order to require that notice is given of any application for planning permission and to make provision for publicising such applications, and it bars an LPA from considering an application unless those requirements are met by virtue of that section. The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, (TCP(DMP)(E)O 2015), SI 2015/595 is the current development order in England, which sets out the minimum statutory requirements governing the publicity of planning applications. The principal requirements are found in (TCP(DMP)(E)O 2015), SI 2015/595, art 15...

Read More Right Arrow