Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Representative

Representative meaning

What does Representative mean?
In data protection practice, a “representative” (often called an EU representative or UK GDPR representative) is the local point of contact appointed by a controller or processor that is not established in the relevant territory. The term is defined in legislation: Article 27 EU GDPR and Article 27 UK GDPR. A representative must be a natural or legal person established in the Union (EEA) for EU GDPR (in a Member State where the relevant data subjects are located), or in the UK for UK GDPR, designated in writing. Core features: acts on the controller’s or processor’s behalf regarding GDPR obligations; maintains records of processing and provides them to supervisory authorities; and serves as point of contact for data subjects and regulators. Appointment does not create an establishment or shift responsibility, though representatives may face enforcement. Required where non‑EEA or non‑UK organisations offer goods or services to, or monitor behaviour of, individuals in the territory, unless an exemption applies (occasional, low‑risk processing with no large‑scale special‑category or criminal‑offence data; public authorities). Usage is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland (UK GDPR) and Ireland (EU GDPR); the difference is where the representative must be located.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Representative

CHECKLISTS
Electing or Appointing I&C Representatives under the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3426): Checklist on Negotiated Agreements, Default Model, Ballots and Independent Scrutiny

This checklist outlines the requirements for choosing or appointing information and consultation (I&C) representatives for the purposes of the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (ICER 2004), SI 2004/3426. For broader guidance concerning representatives under ICER 2004, refer to Practice Note: ICER employee representatives. For further guidance on ICER 2004, see Practice Note: The Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004. Government guidance issued in 2006 has been archived but remains a useful source of guidance. See also the Acas guidance on informing and consulting on workplace matters. General requirements I&C representatives do not need to be the same individuals as negotiating representatives; employees may appoint different people to serve as I&C representatives. I&C representatives must be genuinely representative of their constituencies. The arrangements should be transparent and acceptable to employees, with outcomes viewed as demonstrably fair. No affected employee should be unreasonably excluded from standing for election. All affected employees on the date of the election should be entitled to...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Audit committee composition: UK corporate governance and DTR requirements with investor guidance for quoted and investment companies

This Checklist outlines the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules concerning the composition of audit committees in quoted companies, alongside best practice set out by leading representative bodies for institutional investors. It further reflects guidance issued by the Quoted Companies Alliance for small and mid-size quoted entities, and by the Association of Investment Companies for investment companies. The summary draws on the UK Corporate Governance Code (UKCG Code) to set expectations for committee make-up and expertise. Quoted companies (other than investment companies) The audit committee must consist of at least three independent non-executive directors, or two for smaller companies (ie those outside the FTSE 350). The chair of the board should not sit on the committee. The board should assure itself that at least one committee member has recent and relevant financial experience. As a whole, the audit committee should possess competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates... ...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Advising suspects on PACE Code D identification: defence checklist on ‘useful purpose’, consent and first description disclosure (England and Wales)

This Checklist This Checklist outlines the matters that legal representatives should weigh when advising a client about identification procedures under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Code of Practice D (PACE Code D), and it ought to be read alongside the Practice Note: Advising a suspect on identification procedures. The legal representative should consider the following: Is the identification contested? Would an identification procedure fulfil a 'useful purpose'?...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Representative

FLOWCHARTS
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: Westminster sifting for negative SIs—parliamentary process, committees and timelines (flowchart)

The following flowchart Outlines the principal stages of estate administration, beginning with initial contact from a personal representative or a relative of the deceased, proceeding to the submission for a grant of representation, and concluding with the finalisation and closure of the matter within the file itself...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart: process to exercise step-in rights under a collateral warranty

The defined terms in the flowchart shall have the following meaning: Appointed Representative Regulations — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Appointed Representatives) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1217 Business Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) Order 2001, SI 2001/1177 Exemption Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Exemption) Order 2001, SI 2001/1201 Non-Exempt Activities Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Professions) (Non-Exempt Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/1227 PRA-regulated activities — denotes regulated activities designated as PRA‑regulated activities under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (PRA‑regulated Activities) Order 2013, SI 2013/556 RAO — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/544 UCITS qualifier — carries the meaning attributed to it in the Glossary of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook To determine whether an activity is regulated, follow the flowchart below. Click below to view or print...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Charging orders in England and Wales: procedure from application/ICO to final order (CNBC and non-CNBC) — flowchart

This Checklist This Checklist outlines practical due diligence actions for selecting and overseeing agents or representatives, such as verifying ownership and control, evaluating country and payment risks, defining scope and remuneration (including success fee exposure), confirming competence and credentials, and making sure fees, licences and facilitation payment controls are consistent with the company’s anti-bribery requirements. Practitioners supporting clients with appointing and supervising agents or representatives should reflect on the following: every agent or representative of the business should be subject to due diligence the company must undertake its own enquiries and augment any information with newspaper or web-based research to satisfy itself regarding each agent whether the company has analysed and documented the rationale for, and the procedure by which, an agent was appointed...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Representative

NEWS
Dyson secures UPC injunction over Airwrap patent against Dreame; Spain included via importer link, UK excluded despite Northern Ireland Windsor Framework; court broadens claim scope and finds imminent infringement

On 7 April 2026, Dyson secured an interim injunction against Chinese rival Dreame after the UPC tribunal held that the ‘Dazzle’ hair styler infringed Dyson’s patent, compelling a suspension of sales throughout all UPC Member States and Spain. The Hamburg Local Division explained that including Spain (despite it not being a UPC Member State) was warranted because Dreame’s EU-based importer was actively putting the goods on the Spanish market, thereby creating a sufficiently close jurisdictional connection to hear the claims together under EU jurisdictional rules. The panel, chaired by Sabine Klepsch, declined to stretch the order to the UK. Citing the UK–EU Windsor Framework, under which certain EU product safety requirements still apply in Northern Ireland and oblige non‑EU manufacturers to appoint an EU-based representative to place goods there, Dyson argued this regulatory nexus tied UK sales to the EU and could ground UPC jurisdiction. The judges disagreed, concluding those provisions are principally intended to smooth trade between Northern Ireland and the EU, not to create an adequate legal link...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Re Z: Managing prohibited cross-examination when no QLR can be found—judicial questioning, alternatives, PD3AB, 28-day review and practical preparation (England and Wales)

Re: Z (Prohibition on Cross-examination: No QLR) [2024] EWFC 22, [2024] All ER (D) 99 (Feb) What are the practical implications of this case? A succinct restatement of the statutory framework governing the appointment of a QLR appears at paras [4]–[20] of the judgment, providing a handy overview for deciding if a QLR is required. In day-to-day practice, however, QLRs are in short supply—principally because the available remuneration is limited—so securing one is often unlikely, as occurred here. Where no QLR can be identified, the court must work through all feasible alternatives. If those options are exhausted, a judge may conclude that, in the interests of justice, they must assume the QLR role. Where a judge or magistrate steps into that position, careful wording is essential: the court should not be described as cross-examining a party, but rather as ‘asking questions that the other party wishes to have asked or a similar phrase’ (para [35])...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Court of Appeal: Regulation 90 time of supply for continuous services prevails over VAT group disregard; deferred fees taxable post-exit; B J Rice not binding (Prudential v HMRC)

The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC [2024] EWCA Civ 300 The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Prudential) acted as the representative member of its VAT group. Another company in the group, Silverfleet Capital Ltd (SCL), executed an investment management services contract to provide services to Prudential. Under that contract, SCL was also eligible for a management fee and deferred performance fees once a specified hurdle rate was achieved. Under section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994), no VAT was payable on the management fee because they were in the same VAT group. In 2007, SCL exited the VAT group. In 2014 and 2015, the triggers for paying the further deferred performance fee were satisfied and SCL invoiced Prudential for over £9m in total. The question before the Court of Appeal was whether those additional performance fees ultimately constituted consideration for a supply made while both companies were members of the same VAT group or, alternatively, whether the services amounted to a continuous supply of services...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Representative

PRACTICE NOTES
UK taxation of trading by trustees and personal representatives: badges of trade, computation of profits, capital allowances, basis period reform, loss relief, and reporting

Trustees and personal representatives can, in fact, carry on a trade. For example, where a self-employed trader dies, the personal representative may keep the business running until it is wound down or sold. In the same way, trustees or interest in possession beneficiaries might be trading and could qualify for reliefs such as roll-over relief or business asset disposal relief. The broad tax rules governing trading apply to all traders alike, whether they are individuals, trustees, or personal representatives. This Practice Note sets out those principles below. Is there a trade? The key issue to examine is whether there is a trade. At times this will be clear, for instance when personal representatives step in to continue the deceased’s business; however, in other situations even a solitary transaction can amount to a trade. As an illustration, trustees who buy a property to renovate may, depending on the circumstances, be regarded as operating a property development business. If so, any gain on the later sale would fall within income...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Removing or Replacing Personal Representatives in England and Wales: Renunciation, Passing Over (SCA 1981 s116), AJA 1985 s50, Will‑Trust Issues, Judicial Trustees, Procedure and Costs

There are several routes, both uncontested and contested, to remove a personal representative; below is an outline of each method. Renunciation An executor can disclaim the right to apply for a grant of probate by a signed, witnessed written renunciation filed at the probate registry (see Practice Note: Removal, renunciation and retirement of personal representatives). Renunciation is barred where the executor has already intermeddled with the estate (see Practice Note: Intermeddling in an estate). By contrast, an administrator need not make any statement about intermeddling. A template for administrators’ renunciation appears in Form PA16. If an executor declines to renounce or to extract probate at that stage, the proving executors may obtain probate with power reserved to that executor instead (see Practice Note: The type of grant needed). Passing over–section 116 Senior Courts Act 1981 Under section 116 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), the court can, in special circumstances, if necessary or expedient, pass over the person otherwise entitled to the grant—even one...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Parties in civil litigation: procedural status, capacity, authority and special categories (England and Wales)

This Practice Note This Practice Note offers a summary of the categories of parties that may take part in litigation in England and Wales, whether as claimants or defendants, together with the principal procedural matters and practical points their legal advisers should consider. It outlines who may sue or be sued and the implications for case management and strategy. Corporations Partnerships Sole traders Unincorporated associations Children Insolvent individuals or companies Groups The estate of a deceased party Litigants in person It is crucial that party status aligns with the issues to be determined. In Haque (representative/member of Muttahida Quami Movement Pakistan unincorporated association) v Hussain, the defendants were sued as trustees but advanced a defence which the court held could be pursued only in their capacity as members of an unincorporated association, not as trustees. At [27], the judge noted that, in principle, the active defendants should have recognised this within stage one of the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Representative

PRECEDENTS
UK GDPR representative appointment and notification clauses for controller–processor (supplier–customer) agreements — pro-controller and pro-processor options

Note These provisions are prepared on the basis that the applicable contract is a business-to-business arrangement, with the supplier acting as processor for a customer in the role of controller, in relation to the processing of personal data governed by the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The terms ‘supplier’ and ‘customer’ (in place of ‘processor’ and ‘controller’) are used to simplify incorporation into commercial contracts. The drafting also relies on the additional defined terms ‘Agreement’, ‘Business Day’, ‘Customer’, ‘Data Protection Laws’, ‘Data Subject’, ‘GDPR’ and ‘Supplier’, which are assumed to be defined appropriately elsewhere in the relevant agreement. It is further assumed that ‘GDPR’ refers to UK GDPR and that ‘Data Protection Laws’ includes UK GDPR. These provisions can also be adapted for circumstances where the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679, applies... 1 Definition (to be incorporated into relevant part of the agreement) 1.1 Representative •...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent controlling shareholder relationship deed for LSE Main Market listed companies (England and Wales law)

STOP PRESS : Significant reforms to the UK prospectus regime came into force on 19 January 2026 Major changes to the UK regime for public offers and admissions to trading took effect on 19 January 2026. The framework for securities offers and UK market admissions is now chiefly contained in the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations 2024, SI 2024/105 (the POATRs), together with the FCA sourcebook, The Prospectus Rules: Admission to Trading on a Regulated Market (PRM). The UK Prospectus Regulation and the FCA Prospectus Regulation Rules have been repealed. The reforms aim to simplify capital raising and substantially lessen the circumstances in which a company must publish an FCA-approved prospectus for a further share issue. For full details of the changes, see Practice Note: UK prospectus regime reform. This Practice Note sets out the prospectus regime that applied before 19 January 2026...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Standard Non-Molestation Order and Case Management Directions (England and Wales): FLA 1996, FPR Part 3A participation, police disclosure, prohibition of cross-examination, Qualified Legal Representative scheme

At the Family Court held at [ Court name ] Case No: [ Case number ] Non-Molestation Order The Family Law Act 1996 Full name(s) of the child(ren)Boy or girlDate(s) of birth [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] Before [ name of judge ], in private, on [ date ] at a [ type of hearing ] Important notice to the respondent, [ RESPONDENT NAME ] of [ RESPONDENT address ] You are required to comply with this order. Please read it thoroughly. If any part is unclear, seek advice from a solicitor, a Legal Advice Centre or the Citizens Advice Bureau. You have the right to ask the court to vary or discharge this order. Warning: without reasonable excuse, doing anything this order prohibits amounts to a criminal offence; on conviction you may be liable to imprisonment for a...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Representative

Q&As
Employer auxiliary aid in union paid time off; trade organisation duty?

Duty to make reasonable adjustments The Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) establishes a duty to make reasonable adjustments (referred to below as ‘the duty’), which contains three distinct requirements. The third requires that, where a disabled person would, without the provision of an auxiliary aid, face a substantial disadvantage in relation to a relevant matter when compared with people who are not disabled, such steps as are reasonable must be taken to supply the auxiliary aid. The situations in which the duty arises differ across workplace settings. Accordingly, the precise circumstances that engage the duty will not be uniform across all settings. For all three requirements, the duty is triggered only where a disabled individual is placed at a substantial disadvantage compared with non‑disabled people ‘in relation to a “relevant matter”’, and what counts as a ‘relevant matter’ (as defined in EqA 2010, Sch 8 Pt 1) varies according to the particular type of workplace. As a result, application of the duty is context‑specific to the workplace in question....

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Can a personal representative recover leasehold service charges from beneficiaries in occupation?

For the purposes of this Q&A, it is assumed that: the leasehold property forms part of the unadministered Estate the Estate bears the primary responsibility to pay the service charge the beneficiaries in occupation have a right to occupy the leasehold property Whilst the Estate is being administered, legal ownership of the deceased’s unadministered assets is vested in the personal representatives (PRs) for the purposes of administration and to carry out that administration. In the meantime, no beneficiary, whether taking under the deceased’s Will or by intestacy, has any proprietary interest in any particular or identifiable asset comprised within the unadministered Estate, nor any enforceable claim to such an item. See Practice Note: Beneficiaries’ rights and remedies. The PRs hold extensive powers to administer and manage the deceased’s Estate...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Representative of an Overseas Business: Is a Holding Company a Genuine Commercial Enterprise for Entry Clearance?

Practice Note: Applying under the Representative of an Overseas Business category Please see Practice Note: Applying under the Representative of an Overseas Business category, which sets out the eligibility criteria and process (including application form and fee details) for submitting an initial application or seeking an extension under the UK immigration route for Representatives of an Overseas Business. The note explains the eligibility criteria for Sole Representatives of an Overseas Business...

Read More Right Arrow