Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Res inter alios acta

Res inter alios acta meaning

What does Res inter alios acta mean?
A Latin maxim meaning “a thing done between others”. In practice it denotes the general rule that dealings, statements or events involving third parties are normally irrelevant to, and should not prejudice, the rights and liabilities in dispute between the parties before the court. It is not defined by statute; it is a descriptive common-law expression recognised in case law and used across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland with broadly consistent effect. Typical applications include: - Evidence: third‑party transactions or conduct are usually inadmissible unless they are directly relevant to a fact in issue (for example, agency, knowledge/notice, conspiracy or estoppel), or fall within established evidential gateways. - Damages: collateral benefits from third parties (such as certain insurance, gifts or benevolence) and settlements with others are commonly treated as res inter alios acta and not deducted when assessing damages, subject to recognised exceptions. - Contract/privity: a contract or act between others generally cannot impose obligations on, or be used to the detriment of, a non-party. The maxim operates alongside modern rules of relevance, hearsay and statutory regimes; it does not bar third‑party material where the law makes it probative and admissible.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Res inter alios acta

NEWS
Key banking and finance decisions: enforcement, security, assignment, insolvency, sanctions, jurisdiction and trade finance (December 2025–January 2026)

Banking & Finance—December 2025 and January 2026 case round-up Skyros Maritime Corp and another company v Hapag-Lloyd AG ‘Skyros’ & ‘Agios Minas’ [2025] EWCA Civ 1529 Shipping finance—charterparty damages for late redelivery of vessels The Court of Appeal allowed the owners’ appeal from the Commercial Court concerning damages arising from the delayed redelivery of time‑chartered container ships. The vessels, ‘SKYROS’ and ‘AGIOS MINAS’, were returned late in breach of the charterparties by Hapag‑Lloyd, after the owners had already arranged to sell them. The central question was whether the owners could obtain substantial damages—calculated as the gap between market and charter rates—for the overrun period even though they had no plan to re‑fix the ships. The Court of Appeal confirmed they could. Applying the settled maritime principle, damages for late redelivery are assessed by reference to the market rate, irrespective of whether the owner would, in fact, have gone back into the market to secure a new fixture. When quantifying loss, the owners’ post‑redelivery plans were...

Read More Right Arrow