“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”
ParrisWhittakerAccess all documents on Rule 2.7 announcement
This document sets out a comprehensive timetable for a recommended takeover offer, prepared by reference to the provisions of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) and applicable statutory rules. It traces the process from the stages before a firm intention to make an offer is announced (a Rule 2.7 announcement) through to the completion of any 'squeeze-out' procedure. For other examples of takeover timetables, see: Timetable—hostile offer Timetable—scheme of arrangement Public company takeovers quiz Part 3 of our public company takeovers quiz features multiple-choice questions that assess users' knowledge of the offer timetable for takeover transactions. After each question, the correct answer is shown together with feedback and links to relevant materials. The quiz is designed for private practice lawyers, in-house counsel, corporate finance professionals and other parties involved in takeover transactions. For further details, see Practice Note: Public company takeovers quiz—Part 3...
This document sets out a comprehensive timetable for a hostile takeover offer. It has been prepared with reference to the provisions of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) and the relevant statutory rules. The timetable maps the steps from the lead‑up to the announcement of a firm intention to make an offer (a Rule 2.7 announcement) through to the completion of any squeeze‑out procedure. The schedule can change: for example, document preparation may conclude sooner than expected, or the arrival of a rival offeror may cause the timetable to default to that of the competing offeror. For other illustrations of timetables used in takeover transactions, see: Timetable—recommended offer Timetable—scheme of arrangement Public company takeovers quiz Part 3 of our public company takeovers quiz contains multiple‑choice questions that test users’ knowledge of the new offer timetable for takeover transactions. After each question, the correct answer is shown along with feedback and links to the relevant materials. The quiz is designed for...
This Practice Note examines the law and practice on giving irrevocable commitments or undertakings or letters of intent in the context of a public company takeover (whether by way of contractual offer or scheme of arrangement) as governed by the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code). It explores the legal and practical aspects of obtaining irrevocable commitments or undertakings and letters of intent in public company takeovers—whether via a contractual offer or a scheme of arrangement—under the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). It contrasts irrevocables with letters of intent and the main reasons to prefer one over the other. Bidders typically seek irrevocable undertakings to accept from major target shareholders just before a Rule 2.7 firm intention announcement, to gain comfort that the bid will succeed. Such commitments let the offeror show substantial support on announcement and may help secure a recommendation from the offeree board. Letters of intent are often used instead. Institutional shareholders often avoid binding themselves to one bidder, as policy or...
This Resource Note summarises the key features of Rule 2 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code), addressing strict confidentiality obligations ahead of any announcement and both the scheduling and substance of offer announcements. It signposts pertinent materials, commentary and guidance issued by the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the Panel), together with Lexis+® UK commentary and tools, to provide practical insight and guidance into interpreting and applying Rule 2. Materials referenced in this Resource Note comprise the following: Practice Statements released by the Panel Executive (the body responsible for the day‑to‑day supervision and regulation of takeovers) (Executive), which offer informal guidance on how the Executive usually interprets and applies the Code Panel Statements (P/S) and Panel Instruments issued by the Panel Public Consultation Papers (PCP) and Response Statements (RS) from the Code Committee the Panel’s published Annual Reports discussing general overarching issues (Annual Reports) newsletters, together with technical and procedural notes published by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)...
Rule 19—Setting the scene This Resource Note summarises the key provisions of Rule 19 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) and signposts relevant materials, commentary and guidance from the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (Panel), alongside Lexis+® UK analysis and resources, to offer practical guidance on interpreting and applying Rule 19. Code and Lexis+® UK resources Detailed Notes to the Code (Notes), expanding on the intended implementation of the Rules, and relevant Appendices addressing specific issues Practice Statements issued by the Panel Executive (the body undertaking the day-to-day takeover supervision and Code regulation) (Executive), providing informal guidance on how the Executive typically interprets and applies the Code Panel Statements published by the Panel (P/S) and Panel Instruments Public Consultation Papers (PCP) and Response Statements (RS) issued by the Code Committee Relevant Lexis+® UK resources Rule 19—Information What it covers Rule 19 addresses the standards of care, accuracy and responsibility for the publication of...
Not for publication, release or dissemination (whether in whole or in part, directly or indirectly) in, into or from any jurisdiction where doing so would contravene the applicable laws or regulations of such jurisdiction. [ insert date ] For immediate release [Recommended] [cash] offer (the Offer ) by [ Insert name of offeror ] for [ Insert name of offeree ] PLC Offer unconditional[ in all respects] On [ insert date of Rule 2.7 announcement ], the board[ s ] of [ insert full name of Offeror ] [ and [ insert full name of Offeree ] ] stated, in accordance with Rule 2.7 of the Code, that [ [ Offeror ] had made OR they had reached agreement on the terms of ] a [ n ] [ recommended ] [ cash ] offer [ to be made by [ Offeror ] ] to purchase [ the entire issued and to be issued ] ordinary share capital of [ Offeree ]...
Not for release, publication or distribution (in whole or in part, directly or indirectly) in, into or from the united states of america, canada, australia or japan or any other jurisdiction where to do so would constitute a violation of the relevant laws or regulations of such jurisdiction. Any new shares of the offeror to be allotted pursuant to the offer have neither been, nor will they be, registered in the United States of America under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, nor under the applicable securities laws of Canada, Australia or Japan...
Not for release, publication, or dissemination (whether in whole or in part, directly or indirectly) in, into, or from any jurisdiction where such action would breach the relevant laws or regulations of that jurisdiction. [ insert date ] For immediate release Recommended [cash] offer (the Offer) for [ Insert name of offeree ] PLC by [ Insert name of offeror ] Court sanction of scheme of arrangement On [ insert date of Rule 2.7 announcement ], the boards of [ insert full name of Offeree ] ([ Offeree ]) and [ insert full name of Offeror ] ([ Offeror ]) confirmed, in accordance with Rule 2.7 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code), that they had agreed the terms of a recommended [ cash ] offer by [ Offeror ] to purchase the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of [ Offeree ] (the Acquisition), which is to be effected by a court‑sanctioned scheme of arrangement pursuant to Part 26...