Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Rule in Hastings-Bass

Rule in Hastings-Bass meaning

What does Rule in Hastings-Bass mean?
In trust practice, the Rule in Hastings-Bass describes court intervention to set aside or unwind a trustee’s discretionary decision where the trustee failed to take relevant matters into account, took irrelevant matters into account, and would not have acted as they did but for that error. It is a case-law doctrine, refined in England and Wales by the Supreme Court in Pitt v Holt; Futter v HMRC: relief depends on a breach of fiduciary duty in the decision‑making process, not merely an adverse outcome (including tax). Reliance on apparently competent professional advice will often preclude relief; alternatives may include the distinct equitable “mistake” jurisdiction or a negligence claim. Typical usage is in family trust and pension scheme contexts to render a decision voidable and to unravel consequential transactions and tax liabilities, subject to equitable discretion and third‑party protections. Jurisdictional note: - England & Wales and Northern Ireland follow Pitt v Holt’s narrowed approach. - Scotland does not recognise a freestanding “Hastings-Bass” rule; trustee decisions may instead be reduced for breach of trust or material error under Scots law. - Ireland has treated the principle as persuasive in equity; availability and scope are case-specific and developing. Search terms: set aside trustee decision; breach...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Rule in Hastings-Bass

NEWS
Litigation and Dispute Resolution Update: Arbitration Bill, CPRC changes, cryptoasset enforcement, civil fraud, defamation, costs control, cross-border service, expert evidence (18 July 2024)

In this issue: Key DR Developments Court information Claims and remedies Costs and funding Cross-border disputes Evidence and disclosure Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR Developments King’s Speech 2024 Key announcements: The Prime Minister’s Office has issued briefing notes on the King’s Speech 2024. They outline the Arbitration Bill, its territorial reach, and steps to implement the 2022 Law Commission’s recommendations on Arbitration Law. Commentary on the Bill’s inclusion is provided by Matthew Saunders, partner at Ashurst LLP, and Jason Raeburn, partner at Paul Hastings LLP—see: LNB News 17/07/2024 63—King’s Speech 2024—key Arbitration announcements. CPRC minutes June 2024 minutes of the CPR Committee meeting: The Civil Procedure Rule Committee met on 7 June 2024 in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference, covering several topics, including changes to CPR 25 (interim remedies and security for costs) and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Arbitration roundup: King’s Speech Bill, CIArb priorities, French FIDIC admissibility, Sri Lanka enforcement appeal, UNCITRAL automated contracting, institutional updates (CRCICA, RIMA–ITOTAM, SIAC), plus non-pecuniary remedies

In this issue: Arbitration in England & Wales International Arbitration Institutional and ad hoc arbitration and related news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Arbitration in England & Wales King's Speech 2024—key arbitration announcements The Prime Minister’s Office has released background briefing notes for the King’s Speech 2024 containing details of the Arbitration Bill. The notes set out the Bill’s territorial reach and its purpose—namely to implement the proposals arising from the Law Commission’s 2022 review of Arbitration Law, and to do so across the specified jurisdictions. Commentary on the Bill’s inclusion is provided by Matthew Saunders, partner at Ashurst LLP, and Jason Raeburn, partner at Paul Hastings LLP. See: LNB News 17/07/2024 63. CIArb—recommendations for UK government following 2024 election The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) has presented seven proposals for the UK government after the 2024 general election. Highlights are reaffirmed backing for the rule of law; reinstatement of the Arbitration...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Rule in Hastings-Bass

PRACTICE NOTES
Private Client Glossary (England and Wales): Wills, Probate, Trusts, Capacity and UK Taxation

Private Client England & Wales glossary A Abatement When, after settling the deceased’s funeral costs, debts and liabilities, the remaining estate cannot satisfy all legacies in full, the gifts are reduced accordingly, unless the Will shows a different intention. In a solvent estate, the order for reduction appears in Part II of Schedule 1 to the Administration of Estates Act 1925. Refer to Practice Note: Payment of legacies. Accruals basis Where income is taxed on an accruals basis, it is attributed to a given tax year by reference to the number of days within that year during which the activity giving rise to the liability accrued. See Practice Note: What is the basis of income tax?. Accumulation and maintenance (A&M) trust A form of non‑interest in possession trust designed to benefit children and young people up to 25, which received favourable inheritance tax treatment between 1975 and 2006. See Practice Note: Accumulation and maintenance trusts—IHT [Archived]. Accredited Legal Representative (ALR) ...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Bermuda trust law: reserved powers, statutory Hastings Bass, section 47 transactions, perpetuity reform, PTCs, firewall and creditor protection, purpose/charitable trusts, privacy and taxation overview

This Practice Note summarises Bermuda trust law at a high level and signposts its distinctive characteristics, including expansive reserved powers rules, codified Hastings Bass measures, and adaptable perpetuity provisions. Bermuda’s trust legislation Trustee Act 1975 (TA 1975) – addresses, among other matters, trustees’ powers, entitlements and duties, together with the Bermuda courts’ supervisory jurisdiction in trust matters. Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (TSPA 1989) – sets out Bermuda’s broad reserved powers regime, firewall protections, and rules on purpose trusts. Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 (Bermuda) (PA 2009) – states that trusts created on or after 1 August 2009 may exist indefinitely provided they do not own Bermuda land, and permits the disapplication of the rule against perpetuities for earlier trusts. Trusts (Regulation of Trust Business) Act 2001 – requires the licensing of persons conducting trust business in Bermuda. Who can serve as trustee? There is no need for trustees to be resident in Bermuda, although appointing licensed local trustees...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Trusts: construction, rectification and mistake—principles, Hastings-Bass limits, rescission of voluntary dispositions, and procedure under CPR Part 8 and AJA 1985 s 48 (England and Wales)

The courts of equity have a well-recognised jurisdiction to grant relief against the consequences of mistakes and ambiguities in a variety of contexts relating to trusts. Such matters seldom involve adversarial contention. Ordinarily, petitions for this kind of relief amount to ‘friendly litigation’, with participants collaborating to resolve the difficulty through the court process. A shadow claim in professional negligence can sit in the background, quite often against an adviser whose guidance, or omission of it, produced the error. In those circumstances, professional indemnity insurers often meet the cost of the application, providing the necessary funding. When uncertainty or an error emerges, the initial task is to identify the character of the problem so as to determine the available remedy in principle. Does it concern the wording of an instrument, or the legal effect of that instrument or a broader transaction undertaken? If the wording is in issue, the court will look to construction (for ambiguity or obscurity) or rectification (where the written terms mis-state the agreement). If the...

Read More Right Arrow