Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Russian roulette

Russian roulette meaning

What does Russian roulette mean?
In practice, a Russian roulette clause (also known as a shotgun clause) is a contractual buy–sell deadlock mechanism used in shareholders’ and joint venture agreements (and sometimes LLP or partnership agreements). Where a deadlock persists after escalation, one shareholder (A) may serve notice naming a price per share or for the entire interest and offering to buy B’s stake at that price. Within a fixed period, B must either sell at that price or elect to buy A’s entire interest on the same terms. If B fails to respond in time, B is deemed to sell to A. The purpose is to compel a resolution and deter opportunistic pricing, because A risks B becoming the buyer at the named price. However, the mechanism can operate harshly where shareholders have unequal financial resources, allowing a wealthier party to set a price the other cannot meet. A descriptive contractual term, not defined by legislation or case law, used consistently across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Enforceability depends on clear drafting: deadlock triggers, notice and response periods, price-setting, completion mechanics, funding, permitted transferees, and any regulatory or third-party consents. Alternatives include Texas shoot-out and sealed-bid clauses.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Flowcharts about Russian roulette

FLOWCHARTS
Joint venture deadlock mechanisms: Texas shoot-out (sealed bids), auction variants and Russian roulette hybrid—flowchart

Refer to the flowchart below for a decision pathway clarifying when establishing a joint venture falls under the EU Merger Regulation, outlining scope and applicability...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Russian roulette

PRACTICE NOTES
Deadlock in UK corporate joint ventures: triggers, reserved matters, and resolution mechanisms (escalation, ADR/expert determination, buy-sell options, share transfers, and termination via liquidation or winding up)

A deadlock arises when parties to an agreement face an irreconcilable dispute and cannot reach consensus. The expression is commonly associated with corporate joint ventures (JVs), especially 50:50 JVs where neither side holds a controlling interest and, as a result, unanimous consent is required for all decisions. Deadlock may equally occur in non-50:50 JVs, for example where specific matters demand unanimity or where more than two JV participants vote and no majority is achieved. Certain conflicts can trigger a deadlock that prevents the joint venture company (JVC) from operating effectively. It is sensible to address at the outset how a deadlock might be settled. Consequently, joint venture agreements (JVAs) usually include deadlock resolution mechanisms (often in stepped stages) that must be followed to resolve the impasse. Defining deadlock procedures within the JVA will save time and expense if a deadlock emerges and will help the parties to maintain the JV's continuity. On occasion, the very circumstances that produce a deadlock can also prompt the aggrieved party to seek relief under...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Planning for and resolving deadlock in 50/50 corporate joint ventures: triggers, governance and dispute resolution tools, and exit mechanisms (Russian roulette, Texas/Mexican shoot-out, sale, liquidation)

Where two partners in a joint venture each hold an equal 50% stake in the share capital of the joint venture company (JVC), that arrangement is commonly referred to as a deadlock, or deadlocked, joint venture. Under this structure, both parties must consent to any and all decisions to be taken by the JVC; where they fail to agree on a proposed course of action, no action is implemented and the status quo is preserved. When will deadlock be an issue?...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Russian roulette

PRECEDENTS
Precedent: 50:50 joint venture shareholders’ agreement with reserved matters and Russian roulette deadlock buy–sell (law of England and Wales)

This Agreement is hereby entered into on [ insert date ] 20[ insert year ]. Parties [ Insert name of first shareholder ], incorporated in England and Wales with number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] ([ A ]), [ Insert name of second shareholder ], incorporated in England and Wales with number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] ([ B ]), [ Insert name of the company in which the shares are held ], incorporated in England and Wales with number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Company). BACKGROUND (A) As at the date of this Agreement, being the effective date, the Company has in issue ordinary shares of £[ insert nominal value ] each, of which one ordinary share has been allotted fully paid and stands in the name of [ A ]...

Read More Right Arrow