Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Sandbagging

Sandbagging meaning

What does Sandbagging mean?
Sandbagging describes a buyer preserving the right to bring an indemnity or warranty claim in an acquisition agreement even if the buyer knew about the breach before completion and still closed. It is a descriptive M&A term (not defined in legislation) used across share and asset purchase agreements. Under the contract laws of England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, a warranty claim is a contractual remedy; reliance is not an element. Accordingly, absent express drafting to the contrary, a buyer’s prior knowledge will not usually bar a warranty claim. Parties therefore negotiate “pro‑sandbagging” clauses (claims allowed notwithstanding investigation or knowledge) and “anti‑sandbagging” clauses (claims excluded where the buyer had knowledge). Key drafting points include: how “knowledge” is defined (actual, constructive or imputed), whose knowledge counts, the effect of the disclosure letter and data room, whether warranties are repeated at completion, exclusive remedy and caps/baskets, and fraud carve‑outs. Market practice differs by jurisdiction. In the UK and Ireland, sellers commonly seek anti‑sandbagging language and broad disclosure/knowledge qualifiers; buyers seek the opposite or rely on the default position. In many US states, sandbagging is permitted by default unless excluded, while certain civil law systems (e.g., France, Germany) are more resistant to sandbagging...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Sandbagging

PRACTICE NOTES
Cross-border private M&A: UK practitioner’s guide to transaction stages, due diligence, local counsel, pricing mechanics and UK-US/civil law differences on warranties, indemnities and risk allocation

Cross-border private M&A transactions This Practice Note sets out an overview of the issues an English-qualified lawyer may encounter when advising a seller or a buyer on a cross-border private M&A deal. The emphasis is on practical considerations a lawyer should keep in mind to ensure the transaction is run in the most efficient and effective manner possible. Key stages in cross-border M&A transactions The principal phases in a cross-border private company M&A transaction are: Preliminaries (pre-signing) stage Here, non-disclosure agreements (NDAs, also called confidentiality agreements) and exclusivity arrangements are settled, due diligence is undertaken, and the share purchase agreement (SPA) with related deal documentation is negotiated. In an auction sale, bids are solicited and a short list of bidders is compiled. The cross-border aspect requires smooth co-ordination—often across several jurisdictions—of the parties’ legal teams and other advisers, particularly in relation to due diligence. Exchange (signing) stage The SPA (together with any other transaction documentation...

Read More Right Arrow