Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Section 426

Section 426 meaning

What does Section 426 mean?
In practice, “Section 426” refers to the court‑to‑court assistance power for cross‑border insolvency in Insolvency Act 1986, s 426. It enables the courts of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland to request and grant assistance to each other and to courts in any “relevant country or territory” designated by statutory instrument (largely Commonwealth jurisdictions and certain Crown Dependencies). Typical use is by letter of request in cross‑border insolvency, including recognition or enforcement assistance, examination and disclosure orders, stays, and directions to apply either UK insolvency law or the requesting jurisdiction’s insolvency law. The court has a wide discretion to give such assistance as it thinks appropriate, making s 426 a flexible tool where the Cross‑Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (Model Law) or other regimes are unavailable. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The provision does not apply in the Republic of Ireland; Irish courts use their own domestic and common‑law cooperation frameworks, while UK courts may still consider requests from any jurisdiction designated under s 426. Practically, s 426 is significant for insolvency office‑holders seeking expedited UK or overseas cooperation, asset protection and information‑gathering in cross‑border insolvency cases.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Section 426

PRACTICE NOTES
When English courts remit assets to foreign insolvency proceedings: jurisdiction, statutory gateways (IA 1986 s 426; CBIR), and creditor protection principles

Cases in which a transfer of assets may be ordered Large insolvencies are ever more cross-border in nature. A company may maintain places of business, assets and creditors across several jurisdictions. In these circumstances, questions arise as to how the company’s assets can be most effectively preserved pending an orderly distribution to creditors, and how creditors domiciled in a particular state may be properly protected. A cost-efficient route is to have a single set of insolvency proceedings—typically in the place of incorporation—with the office-holder’s authority recognised in every jurisdiction where the company holds assets or has creditors (see Re Cambridge Gas Transportation). The strength of this approach is enhanced by relief available under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law (see Practice Note: Recognition and other applications under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations) and, where appropriate, section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) (see Practice Note: Court-to-court assistance and Insolvency Act 1986, s 426). Practitioners should, however, be mindful that the principle...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
A-Z glossary of UK corporate restructuring and insolvency: key terms, procedures, enforcement and cross-border issues

This glossary sets out numerous expressions frequently encountered in the restructuring arena. Words appearing in the definitions in bold are explained in other entries in this glossary. For further banking terminology, see the principal Banking & Finance Glossary. Restructuring glossary—A Acceleration: Acceleration means the agent, acting on directions from the majority lenders after an event of default, takes formal action, for example calling for early repayment of the facility. Ad-hoc committee: A temporary creditors’ group (often contrasted with a formal committee) that lacks any entitlement to official recognition. Administration: A process under the IA 1986 in which a financially distressed company is operated by an administrator as a going concern before longer-term outcomes, such as break-up and sale, are pursued. Administrator: An Insolvency Practitioner named by the court, a Qualifying floating charge holder, the directors or the company, to take control and fulfil one of the purposes in IA 1986, Sch B1. Administrative receivership: Arises when a company breaches the terms of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related UK Parliament Acts about Section 426

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
426 Co-operation between courts exercising jurisdiction in relation to insolvency

426  Co-operation between courts exercising jurisdiction in relation to insolvency(1)     An order made by a court in any part of the United Kingdom in the exercise of jurisdiction in relation to insolvency law shall be enforced in any other part of the United Kingdom as if it were made by a court exercising the corresponding jurisdiction in that other part.(2)     However, without prejudice to the following provisions of this section, nothing in subsection (1) requires a court in any part of the United Kingdom to enforce, in relation to property situated in that part, any order made by a court in any other part of the United Kingdom.(3)     The Secretary of State, with the concurrence in relation to property situated in England and Wales of the Lord Chancellor, may by order make provision for securing that a trustee or assignee under the insolvency law of any part of the United Kingdom has, with such modifications as may be specified in the order, the same rights in relation to any property...