Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Several liability (and see “joint liability”)

Several liability (and see “joint liability”) meaning

What does Several liability (and see “joint liability”) mean?
Several liability describes an arrangement where two or more parties are each responsible only for their own, separate obligation or share of loss. A claimant cannot recover the whole debt or damages from a single party; it must pursue each co-obligor or co-defendant for that party’s several share. In practice this is created by contract wording (for example, obligations of “each party severally” or guarantees that are “several but not joint”). It is a descriptive expression rather than generally defined by statute, and its use is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Key features: - Liability is limited to the specified proportion or obligation of the particular party. - Judgment or settlement against one party does not extinguish claims against others; each remains liable for its several share unless expressly released. - No right to full recovery from one party, unlike joint and several liability. Several liability is common in syndicate lending, underwriting, joint ventures and professional appointments. Compare joint liability and joint and several liability. Relevant contribution frameworks include the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (E&W and NI), the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1940, and the Civil Liability Act 1961 (Ireland).
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Several liability (and see “joint liability”)

PRACTICE NOTES
Ending administration: timelines, extensions, court termination, creditor challenges (improper motive), dissolution (para 84), CVL (para 83), Part 26A plans, MVL route, notices and discharge—England and Wales

There are several ways in which an administration can come to an end depending on the specific circumstances of the administration. The default position is that an administration should not run for more than 12 months; unless a different exit is adopted, it terminates automatically at the end of that period. Once the term has expired, former administrators lack authority to exercise any powers conferred on administrators under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). Steps taken while wrongly assuming the appointment is still in force may expose them to personal liability for trespass to or interference with the company's property and to breach of duty/misfeasance proceedings. Where extra time is genuinely required, an extension must be sought for good cause—such as the need to pursue litigation for the estate—see Practice Note: How can an administrator apply to extend the period of automatic termination of administration? Otherwise, the company may: Revert to the control of its directors Be dissolved Enter an alternative process, such...

Read More Right Arrow