Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Share

Share meaning

What does Share mean?
A share is a unit of ownership in a company used to allocate control and economic benefit among shareholders in corporate governance and transactions. Company law in the UK (Companies Act 2006) and Ireland (Companies Act 2014) sets the framework for shares and shareholder rights, though the precise rights arise from statute and the company’s constitution. Key features include: a bundle of rights (typically voting, dividends, information and a share of surplus on winding up); limited liability (exposure capped at any unpaid amount on partly paid shares); transferability subject to statutory and constitutional restrictions; and legal title evidenced by entry on the register of members (which may differ from beneficial ownership). Common classes include ordinary, preference, redeemable and non‑voting shares. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Shares are personal property (moveable property in Scotland) and are commonly used in M&A, capital raisings, allotments, buy-backs, reductions of capital and as security (share charges). Shares are also referred to as equities. Note, however, that “equity securities” is a statutory term in certain contexts (for example, pre‑emption rights) and often refers specifically to ordinary shares and rights to subscribe or convert.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Share

CHECKLISTS
Global merger control: jurisdictions requiring notification of non-controlling minority shareholdings (checklist and thresholds)

Non-controlling minority shareholdings This Checklist identifies the jurisdictions worldwide where acquisitions of non‑controlling minority shareholdings must be notified, provided the other jurisdictional thresholds are satisfied. In this context, ‘non‑controlling minority shareholdings’ means any degree of influence falling short of what the EU Merger Regulation terms ‘decisive influence’—namely, the capacity to exercise a significant level of control over an undertaking’s strategic commercial behaviour. That influence can be exercised through a variety of routes, including share ownership, voting rights (in particular, veto rights), or contractual arrangements, and does not necessarily involve holding a majority shareholding...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Employment settlement agreements for employers: drafting checklist covering statutory validity, tax (PENP/£30,000), pensions, shares/options, directors, public sector controls, covenants, confidentiality, references and adviser requirements

The employer and its advisers ought to reflect on the following matters: Preparatory steps From the employer, gather: a copy of the departing employee’s latest employment contract and any other documents setting out contractual terms (note: these might sit within a staff handbook) particulars of the employee’s contractual benefits pertinent details about the employee’s pension entitlements information on any shares/share options held by the employee; review the Articles of Association, any relevant shareholder agreement, and share scheme documentation. See also Shares and share options below Status of negotiations Will discussions occur directly between the parties, or via their respective legal advisers? How robust is the employer’s bargaining position? How credible are the employee’s existing or potential claims? For any dismissal, is there a fair reason and has a fair procedure been followed? Is the employer in repudiatory breach? What is the employer initially...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Breach of warranty claims under SPAs (and APAs): claimant pre-action checklist and key procedural steps and deadlines (England and Wales)

This Checklist sets out the key points to consider when advising a prospective claimant on a potential breach of warranty claim arising from a share purchase agreement (SPA). The same broad approach will apply to an asset purchase agreement (APA). For additional guidance on breach of warranty claims, see the related content links on the right-hand side. Read this Checklist together with Practice Note: Starting an SPA breach of warranty claim—a practical guide... Action Comments Review the SPA Check the: governing/choice of law provisions — is the agreement governed by English law? jurisdiction provisions — do the English courts have jurisdiction? warranty provisions and warranty limitation provisions — does the issue fall within the warranties and are you within the time limit to bring a breach of warranty claim? Note all deadlines in the agreement that could be relevant to any potential warranty claim... Review the disclosure letter Confirm that the issue has not been disclosed against...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Share

FLOWCHARTS
Shariah inheritance flowchart for practitioners: steps on death, fixed-share beneficiaries, and one-third testamentary freedom (with share calculator link)

Flowchart This flowchart outlines a clear method for deciding how payments from a solvent debtor, owing multiple debts to a single creditor, ought to be properly allocated among those liabilities...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Redenomination of shares: step-by-step procedural flowchart for corporate practitioners

View or print a full-size PDF version:...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Qualifying EMI options on exercise: ITEPA 2003 income tax and NICs flowchart with 2026–27 UK changes

This flowchart is archived and not updated...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Share

NEWS
Irish High Court imposes five-year director restrictions for failing to prioritise separate company interests; key lessons on group structures, documentation, record-keeping and managing multiple directorships

In Downtul Ltd [In Liquidation] v Companies Act [2025] IEHC 358, the Irish High Court imposed restrictions for a period of five years on two directors, after determining that they did not act prudently or have proper regard to the interests of Downtul Limited (the Company) as a distinct entity within a complex corporate arrangement. The decision underlines the intricate nature of directors’ obligations in group scenarios and the need to prioritise the interests of each separate company. As a result of the restriction order, the two individuals—each currently sitting on the boards of more than 100 Irish companies—are barred from acting as company directors for five years unless the relevant company has a nominal share capital of at least €100,000 (or €500,000 where the entity is a public limited company or an unlimited company). Background The individuals were directors of the Company, which leased a commercial premises later occupied and run as a Starbucks café by another company, Atercin. They also served as directors of Atercin...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK corporate law weekly update: ECCTA reforms for LLPs, FCA NSM changes, NSIA review and case, EU board gender targets, High Court rulings and deadlines—9 January 2025

In this issue: Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 Equity capital markets Private M&A (share purchase) Corporate governance—EU Members Company restoration Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information New Q&As Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Protection and Disclosure of Information and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2024 SI 2024/1377: These Regulations update LLP company law to reflect recent changes under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 and expand the scenarios in which a person’s residential address can be withheld from the company register, covering former registered office addresses, while maintaining corporate openness and aligning LLP provisions. They commence on 27 January 2025. See: LNB News 07/11/2024 27. Equity capital markets The Financial Conduct Authority has released Policy Statement PS24/19: Enhancing the National Storage Mechanism, setting out the feedback to Consultation Paper CP24/17, its longer-term vision for the NSM, and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Corporate update: Companies House ACSP registration and identity verification, ESMA prospectus supplement consultation, UK move to T+1 by 2027, High Court rulings on SPA notices and Thames Water restructuring

In this issue Company, disclosures, records and registers Equity capital markets Share purchase agreement Restructuring and insolvency for corporate lawyers Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Company, disclosures, records and registers Companies House publishes guidance on ACSPs and identity verification standards Companies House has issued three pieces of guidance covering the registration of Authorised Corporate Service Providers (ACSPs), what ACSPs do, and the identity verification obligations. The first note explains how to use Companies House’s service to enrol as an ACSP (also referred to as a Companies House authorised agent). Applications open on 25 February 2025. The second clarifies the functions and responsibilities of an ACSP. The third sets out how to meet Companies House identity verification standards when confirming someone’s identity. From 25 March 2025, ACSPs will be able to notify Companies House of identity checks that have been completed. Further, from spring...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Share

PRACTICE NOTES
Advising UK family businesses on recruiting and incentivising non-family managers: culture, governance, equity and tax-advantaged share plans (EMI, CSOP, SAYE, SIP), valuation and exit routes (EOTs, MBOs)

Family business culture Given the relatively high expense of sourcing and appointing senior staff, holding on to the right people with the right expertise is vital for any firm, and even more so for a family-run enterprise where hiring can be tougher than for rivals. Working in a family company brings upsides; research points to greater loyalty, satisfaction, flexibility and security. Yet drawbacks can appear, such as ambiguity, perceived unfairness, muddled accountability and family politics. The task is to bring in senior leaders who align with the culture and to ensure they are incentivised to remain and help grow the business. Therefore, a family business must shape recruitment and induction so they reflect its distinctive culture and complexity. Not every senior executive will thrive in a family setting, and cultural alignment may, in the end, matter as much as formal credentials. This must be weighed against the need to attract high-calibre people and keep them engaged for the long haul. Practical measures available to family firms include supporting new...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
FTSE 350 AGM Season 2018: UK Trends in Board Diversity, Shareholder Dissent, Share Buybacks, Brexit Reporting and Virtual/Hybrid AGMs

ARCHIVED: This content was published in 2018 and is not maintained. This Market Standards Trend Report reviews current market practices and developments arising from the FTSE 350 annual general meeting (AGM) season for 2018...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Public sector equality duty in Wales: specific duties, equality impact assessments, objectives, gender pay action plans, procurement and enforcement (Equality Act 2010 (Statutory Duties) (Wales) Regulations 2011)

The public sector equality duty (PSED) Set out in Part 11 of the Equality Act 2010 (ss 149–159), the public sector equality duty (PSED) comprises a general equality duty applying UK-wide to public bodies listed in Schedule 19 of the EqA 2010, alongside specific duties intended to support delivery of the general duty and enhance transparency. Although the general duty is identical across England, Wales and Scotland, the specific duties made under EqA 2010, s 153 vary. In Wales, listed public bodies must meet particular specific duties that sit alongside the UK-wide general duty. These specific duties bind listed Welsh bodies only. They do not extend to non-devolved public authorities operating in Wales. Under EqA 2010, s 149, the general duty requires public authorities and those exercising public functions to have 'due regard' to the need to: eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and any other behaviour prohibited by or under the EqA 2010 advance equality of opportunity between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Share

PRECEDENTS
Sanctions definitions, warranties and compliance undertakings for share purchase agreement (pro-seller, individual sellers, unconditional long form): clause 1 and Schedule 4 insertions

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-seller—individual sellers—unconditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity • any conduct subject to sanctions set by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctioning Body • the UK, USA, EU and any other relevant authority imposing/administering sanctions; Sanctioned Entity • any person or entity that is, or is owned/controlled (directly or indirectly, per Sanctions Laws) by, a party sanctioned or listed by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctions Laws • all applicable law on Sanctioned Activities binding any Party or this Agreement’s performance; Sanctions Policy • the Sellers’ sanctions policy in Appendix [ insert Appendix number ], as updated and notified to the Buyer; 1.2 The Sellers and the Group Companies, as at the date of this Agreement and throughout its term: are not Sanctioned Entities; have not been notified of any investigation into a Sanctioned Activity; are unaware of Business circumstances that could give rise...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance warranties and definitions for pro-buyer conditional share purchase agreement with individual sellers (long-form)

Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—individual sellers—conditional—long form Add the following as new definitions into clause 1 of the above stated, named precedent document herein...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance definitions, seller warranties, due diligence and notification undertakings for pro-buyer share purchase agreement (corporate seller, conditional, long form)

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—corporate seller—conditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity: activity subject to a Sanctioning Body’s sanctions. Sanctioning Body: United Kingdom, United States of America, European Union, and any other authority administering sanctions. Sanctioned Entity: any person or entity that is, or is owned or controlled (directly or indirectly) by one that is, sanctioned or on a designated list of a Sanctioning Body; ‘owned or controlled directly or indirectly’ has the meaning in Sanctions Laws. Sanctions Laws: all law on a Sanctioned Activity binding either Party or the Agreement’s performance. Sanctions Policy: the Seller’s sanctions policy in Appendix [insert Appendix number], as updated and notified to the Buyer. is not a Sanctioned Entity; has not been notified of any Sanctioned Activity investigation; is unaware of Business circumstances likely to prompt such investigation; shall comply with Sanctions Laws and the Sanctions Policy; ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Share

Q&As
TUPE: Can a transferee continue a pending disciplinary process?

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE 2006), SI 2006/246, reg 4 Where a relevant transfer occurs under these provisions, there is a novation imposed by statute of the contracts of employment of the staff who transfer; the incoming employer stands in the place of the outgoing employer, and each employment contract continues after the transfer as if it had been originally concluded between the employee and the transferee throughout for all relevant legal purposes thereafter...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Voluntary arrangement ending 3-year licence to occupy: occupier remedies

Lease or licence? In Street v Mountford, the House of Lords set out the core indicators of a tenancy. These focus on the substance of the arrangement rather than the label attached to it: exclusive possession of specified premises Although the payment of rent may suggest a tenancy, it is not essential. Whether the proposed arrangement is a lease or a licence turns on the agreement taken as a whole; where the parties in reality confer exclusive possession, that result cannot be avoided by calling the document something else. What counts is the essence of the bargain, not its outward form or chosen description. Even where the paperwork is properly framed at the outset as a true licence, the parties’ subsequent behaviour may alter the character of the arrangement so that a tenancy is later created. For further discussion, see Practice Note: Leases and licences of land—key features and differences, together with the commentary in Hill and Redman’s Division A from paragraph...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Intestacy: Sibling Disclaimer—Accrual or Statutory Trusts?

As outlined in Practice Note: Intestacy—summary and Entitlement on intestacy—flowchart, the order of entitlement on intestacy is set out within section 46 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925)...

Read More Right Arrow