“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”
Co-OpAccess all documents on Small-cap
This Checklist sets out the matters a landlord ought to weigh up where a tenant faces insolvency, highlighting the options open to the landlord, such as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR), forfeiture, drawing on a rent deposit, and pursuing former tenants, guarantors and sub-tenants. It further addresses practical considerations for the landlord, including steps for securing and marketing the property, and contacting the insolvency practitioner. What type of insolvency scenario applies to the tenant? The remedies that can be exercised, and the limits that will bite, differ depending on the particular insolvency arrangement affecting the tenant. Each procedure brings distinct constraints and options. For a table summarising the restrictions, see Practice Note: Quick guide to landlord’s remedies in tenant insolvency. Has contact been made with the insolvency practitioner? It is vital to liaise with the relevant insolvency practitioner to assess the tenant’s position and to evaluate what, if any, prospect exists of outstanding sums being repaid, future rents being protected, or the tenant emerging from the...
This Checklist offers a proposed set of key points to weigh up when assessing whether a construction agreement—be that a building contract, a consultant appointment or a collateral warranty—can be assigned. It also sets out the practical steps to be taken to complete an assignment of the benefit of a construction contract from one party to another. Does the construction contract contain assignment provisions? Construction agreements commonly include an explicit clause addressing the parties’ rights to assign under it. Where the contract says nothing about assignment, either side may assign the contract without limitation or constraint. In some cases, the contract will expressly bar assignment by one or both parties. Usually, the employer is not wholly barred from assigning; however, there is often a cap on how many assignments can occur without the other party’s consent (see further on restrictions below). See Practice Note: Assignment in construction contracts. Are there any restrictions on the right to assign? Construction...
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is no longer being maintained. Structural banking reform and ring-fencing The global financial crisis underscored the necessity for international structural reform of banking. In the UK, the Government brought forward a suite of measures to bolster the resilience of the UK financial system and to avoid taxpayers carrying the burden when banks fail. The Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (FS(BR)A 2013) inserted fresh measures into the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000), obliging the largest UK banks to segregate, within their groups, essential retail banking services from other activities, such as investment and international banking. This separation is termed ring-fencing. Its objective is to shield UK retail banking from shocks arising elsewhere in a banking group, which could otherwise adversely affect global financial markets. Ring-fencing legislation applies only to UK banks with a three-year average of more than £25bn in ‘core deposits’—broadly from individuals and small to medium-sized businesses...
Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Guidance on UK trade mark infringement, offences, passing off, interim injunctions, running IP disputes, privilege, dispute resolution (mediation and arbitration), and the Disclosure Scheme; plus checklists and forms (injunction, application, hearing) Stage 2—Letter before action alleging infringement Notes on infringement, passing off, unjustified threats and drafting; includes a trade mark letter of claim precedent Stage 3—commencing proceedings Procedure, defences and exceptions, IPEC flowchart, pleadings and initial disclosure precedents, and CPR/Part 36 forms Stage 4—case management Procedure and Disclosure Scheme notes, court guides (Chancery, Patents Court, IPEC and Small Claims), and case management questionnaires, Disclosure Review Document, Certificate of Compliance, budgets and directions Stage 5—disclosure and evidence Surveys and witness evidence (PD 57AC), privilege, disclosure (including electronic) and flexible trials; witness statement and Extended Disclosure precedents; affidavits, applications and certificates Stage 6—trial...
Checklist Many family-run enterprises often begin with a largely informal governance arrangement; relatives share a tacit grasp of duties and relationships, and decisions are taken swiftly at the kitchen table. By their nature these businesses are flexible and informal, with priorities typically guided by doing what is best for the family in line with the family’s values, rather than being driven solely by owners’ profit. However, as the business develops and more family members and other employees come on board, managing operations in this ad hoc way becomes progressively harder, as what was once straightforward to coordinate across a small group becomes complex to control as headcount and responsibilities increase. The pros and cons of formalising the family business are addressed in Practice Note: Family businesses. This checklist sets out questions an adviser can put to the family (or that the family can consider themselves) to help design an effective structure for the family business. The same questions will also help identify the matters to be covered in any...
FORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 26 November 2025, as part of Budget 2025, it was confirmed that, with effect from 6 April 2026, the EMI gross assets ceiling will be increased from £30 million to £120 million, the maximum number of full-time equivalent employees will rise from 250 to 500, and the overall aggregate cap on the value of unexercised EMI options that a company or group may have in existence at any given time will be lifted from £3 million to £6 million...
Mergers Court of Justice dismisses appeals by German energy utility companies regarding Commission’s decision to approve the acquisition by E.ON of the distribution and retail energy business as well as certain general assets of Innogy The Court of Justice has handed down its judgments in joined appeals C-171/24 P, C-172/24 P, C-173/24 P, C-174/24 P, C-175/24 P, C-176/24 P, C-177/24 P, C-178/24 P, and C-179/24 P, brought by German energy utilities against the Commission. These challenges targeted the General Court’s rulings that had rejected actions seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision conditionally authorising a related transaction involving E.ON and RWE’s assets. Each appeal was dismissed by the Court of Justice. The nine appeals concerned the General Court’s judgments in cases T-53/21, T-55/21, T-56/21, T-58/21, T-59/21, T-61/21, T-62/21, T-64/21, and T-53/21, which upheld the Commission’s 17 September 20219 decision conditionally clearing the acquisition by RWE of E.ON’s renewable and nuclear electricity generation assets (M.8870). The Court of Justice dismissed all nine appeals. Background RWE and E.ON are...
In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Contamination and pollution Energy efficiency and buildings Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental information Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR)-UK government publishes Business Model documentation On 27 August 2025, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) released a suite of papers on its proposed Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR) Business Model and accompanying policy. The Lexis+ Energy team, working with Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Senior Lecturer in Climate Law at the University of Edinburgh Law School, set out the context for the GGR Business Model; its relationship with the Power BECCS Business Model; the technologies the GGR framework intends to encompass; its legal footing and principal features; and how...
In this issue: Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Networks and grid connections Renewable energy Capacity Market, balancing services and system flexibility Air emissions, efficiency and climate change International energy Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Energy resources on Lexis+® Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing DESNZ has opened a consultation to strengthen Energy Ombudsman (EO) powers. It will concentrate on complaints from domestic energy suppliers, small enterprise complaints against non-domestic suppliers, and heat network complaints. Electricity and gas networks and third-party intermediaries will instead be consulted on separately. The plans include shortening the escalation period for complaints from eight to four weeks, allowing automatic compensation where EO decisions are not put into effect promptly, and granting the EO a statutory designation. DESNZ has also stated that Ofgem will regulate third‑party intermediaries, including energy brokers and price comparison sites, which have previously operated...
CASE HUB ARCHIVED This archived case hub reflects the position as at the judgment of 7 December 2022; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline. Case facts Outline Appeal before the General Court seeking annulment of the Commission’s readopted infringement decision of 17 December 2020, which imposed a reduced fine amounting to €9.4m (AT.39563). Latest development On 7 December 2022, the General Court delivered its judgment and dismissed the appeal in full. In particular, it found that: (i) CCPL grasped the Commission’s reasoning, and the material presented by CCPL was insufficient to overturn the presumption applied by the Commission that CCPL exercised decisive influence over entities within the CCPL group; and (iii) the Commission did not err in concluding that a fine reduction can only be warranted by the aim of preventing the undertaking’s economic viability from being irreparably endangered and its assets stripped of value, so the applicant’s intention to develop operating companies of the CCPL group cannot, in principle, justify such...
Qualifying R&D expenditure (pre-1 April 2024) This Practice Note sets out the scope of qualifying expenditure for two R&D relief schemes, each subject to detailed commencement and transitional provisions: the research and development relief for small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024—see Practice Notes: SME R&D relief—additional deduction (pre-1 April 2024) and SME R&D relief—tax credit (pre-1 April 2024); and the R&D expenditure credit scheme applying to accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024—see Practice Note: R&D expenditure credit (pre-1 April 2024). Together, this Practice Note refers to these as the pre-1 April 2024 schemes. For information about the reliefs generally applying to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, see Practice Notes: The merged R&D expenditure credit (post-1 April 2024) and Enhanced relief for R&D-intensive loss-making SMEs (post-1 April 2024). For details on what counts as qualifying R&D expenditure for those two post-1 April 2024 schemes, see Practice Note: Qualifying R&D expenditure...
This Practice Note offers practical guidance on the stabilised text of the Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce. It examines the themes of enabling e-commerce, openness and e-commerce, trust and e-commerce, transparency, cooperation and development, and telecommunication. Introduction E-commerce has a longstanding presence within the World Trade Organization (WTO). For further background, see Practice Note: E-commerce and the WTO. At the 11th Ministerial Conference, a group of WTO Members agreed to begin exploratory work towards future WTO negotiations on trade-related aspects of e-commerce, set out in the Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce (the Joint Initiative). The Joint Initiative aimed for a high-standard outcome that builds on existing WTO agreement and frameworks, with the widest possible participation of Member States. On 26 July 2024, the co-conveners—Australia, Japan and Singapore—announced that, after five years of talks, participants had reached a stabilised text. The Joint Initiative is expected to benefit consumers and businesses engaged in digital trade, particularly Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), and to support digital transformation among...
Substantial cash transactions can indicate money laundering, terrorist funding, or proliferation financing. Do not take any monies (cash or otherwise) from a [ customer OR client ] until the [ customer OR client ] due diligence (CDD) checks have been finalised. While no statutory cap exists on cash, our internal cash policy states you must not receive cash [ over the limit of £[ 250 ] ] in the office or paid straight into our bank...
These notes and specimen documents make up an automatic enrolment (AE) pack created to assist employers—including small and micro-employers—in meeting the duty to enrol employees into an AE scheme... (A) Notes about AE (i) the statutory obligation (ii) financial thresholds and limits (iii) the statutory and other key terms (B) Documents (i) letters (ii) notices (iii) the employment contract—sample pension clauses AE scheme providers generally issue the core letters and notices, though not always everything required in every relevant situation, and typically none where an employer fulfils the AE duty by using a qualifying pension scheme that is not an automatic enrolment pension scheme... (A) Notes about AE 1 The statutory obligation The primary legal provisions are found in Part 1 of the Pensions Act 2008 (PenA 2008) and the Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) Regulations 2010, SI 2010/772, as later...
PLEASE READ THE TERMS OF THIS LICENCE CAREFULLY This legally enforceable agreement is between you (the ‘Licensee’) and us (‘[ INSERT LICENSOR COMPANY NAME ]’, ‘Licensor’, ‘we’ or ‘us’). It grants you a licence (the ‘Licence’) for the [ INSERT NAME OF SOFTWARE (INCLUDING THE VERSION AND LATEST RELEASE NUMBER AND A BRIEF DESCRIPTION IF REQUIRED) ], together with any complimentary Updates, Upgrades, patches, fixes or workarounds issued by the Licensor under this Licence, and all related data, media or documents (collectively, the ‘Software’). For clarity, this Licence does not constitute a sale of the Software; we remain the sole and beneficial owners of the Software at all times. BY SELECTING ‘ACCEPT’ AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS LICENCE, YOU CONFIRM THAT YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS BELOW, WHICH WILL BIND YOU AND ANY AUTHORISED LICENSEES WHEN ACCESSING, DOWNLOADING OR USING THE SOFTWARE. PLEASE PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY SET OUT IN CLAUSE 10. THIS IS A BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS LICENCE AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS. YOU SHOULD...
IR35 The off-payroll IR35 framework applies where: from 6 April 2017, the engager is a public authority; and from 6 April 2020, a private sector organisation (other than one that is ‘small’) hires a worker via an intermediary, for example a personal service company (PSC). The legislation takes effect in respect of payments made on or after those dates, even where such payments relate to services delivered before those dates. This applies without regard to precisely when the work was performed. In essence, and in practical terms, the off-payroll IR35 rules move the task of deciding whether IR35 applies from the PSC to the end client in relevant cases and, where IR35 does apply, they place the duty to deduct income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) on the party nearest to the PSC in the contractual chain (whether that is the end client contracting directly with the PSC, or another intermediary within more complicated contractual structures). IR35 is engaged...
In this Q&A, the title deeds were not received at all, rather than being mislaid or destroyed. Where deeds are absent or have been destroyed, a first registration application must explain the circumstances that led to their loss or destruction. HM Land Registry assesses each matter on its individual merits, but where the evidence does not convincingly establish those events and place the title’s history beyond doubt, it will usually award only a possessory title. For additional guidance, see Practice Note: Deducing title to unregistered land—stamp duty, mortgages, execution of documents, missing title deeds, sales of part and other considerations. First registration of title if deeds have been lost or destroyed Rule 27 of the Land Registration Rules 2003 (LRR 2003), SI 2003/1417, was amended by the Land Registration (Amendment) Rules 2008, SI 2008/1919, Schedule 1, rule 4(1), paragraph 8(1), and recast under the heading: ‘First registration applications based on adverse possession or where title documents are otherwise unavailable’...
A tenant’s obligations A tenant is under an implied duty to use the rented premises in a tenant-like manner. In Warren v Keen, the Court of Appeal (per Denning LJ) described this as taking proper care of the home and doing the small tasks a reasonable tenant would attend to. Frequently, tenancy agreements include express terms about how the property is to be used and any duties to keep it in good repair; these express provisions supersede the implied obligation. In addition, a tenant owes a tortious duty under the doctrine of waste, meaning they must not do, or fail to do, anything that brings about a permanent alteration to the property’s nature. Removing fixtures Allowing the property to fall into decay A landlord’s remedy once the tenancy has been determined Where a tenant has failed to meet their repairing obligations, the landlord is entitled to claim damages even after the tenancy has come to an end...