Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”

Wolverhampton County Council

Access all documents on Small company

Small company meaning

What does Small company mean?
In practice, a small company is one that qualifies for the small companies regime for accounts, reporting and audit. The term is statutory in the UK: Companies Act 2006, s 382 sets financial size thresholds and s 384 lists exclusions. A company qualifies in a financial year if it meets at least two of the following (as amended, including the 2024 threshold uplifts): turnover not more than £15 million; balance sheet total (the aggregate of assets per the balance sheet) not more than £7.5 million; no more than 50 employees. Movement into or out of the regime generally follows a two‑year rule. Exclusions apply, in particular all public companies and other ineligible entities (for example certain financial and insurance undertakings and members of ineligible groups) under s 384. The classification is significant for audit exemption (see s 477), reduced disclosure under the small companies regime and lighter filing requirements, subject to ongoing reforms. Application is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland under the Companies Act 2006. In Ireland, the Companies Act 2014 provides a comparable statutory test using euro thresholds and a two‑out‑of‑three assessment, with similar exclusions and effects; figures are periodically updated by statutory instrument, so current thresholds...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Small company

CHECKLISTS
Private and unlisted public limited companies: comparison of statutory requirements and procedures under the Companies Act 2006

When forming a limited company, careful thought should be given to whether it ought to be public or private. The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) adopts a 'think small first' approach, on the basis that private companies are smaller than public ones. As a result, CA 2006 generally applies simpler, basic requirements and procedures to private companies, and places additional, extensive requirements and procedures on public companies. The table below sets out some of the key differences in the requirements and procedures that apply to private and public (unlisted) limited companies...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Audit committee composition: UK corporate governance and DTR requirements with investor guidance for quoted and investment companies

This Checklist outlines the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules concerning the composition of audit committees in quoted companies, alongside best practice set out by leading representative bodies for institutional investors. It further reflects guidance issued by the Quoted Companies Alliance for small and mid-size quoted entities, and by the Association of Investment Companies for investment companies. The summary draws on the UK Corporate Governance Code (UKCG Code) to set expectations for committee make-up and expertise. Quoted companies (other than investment companies) The audit committee must consist of at least three independent non-executive directors, or two for smaller companies (ie those outside the FTSE 350). The chair of the board should not sit on the committee. The board should assure itself that at least one committee member has recent and relevant financial experience. As a whole, the audit committee should possess competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates... ...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Checklist: UK quoted company board composition and diversity—UK Corporate Governance Code, Listing Rules and investor voting guidelines; AIC guidance for investment companies

Quoted companies (other than investment companies) This checklist sets out the UK Corporate Governance Code expectations on the composition of quoted company boards, together with best-practice guidance from leading institutional investor representative bodies. It also draws on guidance from the Quoted Companies Alliance for small and mid-size quoted companies, and from the Association of Investment Companies for investment companies. UK Listing Rules Companies listed in the equity shares (commercial companies) category should confirm in their annual report, on a ‘comply or explain’ basis and by reference to a chosen date within the accounting period, whether they meet the following board diversity targets on gender and ethnicity: a minimum of 40% of the board should be women at least one senior role—chair, CEO, senior independent director (SID) or CFO—should be held by a woman at least one director should be from a minority ethnic background Reference: UKLR 6.6.6. 2018 UKCG Code No less than half of the board,...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Small company

FLOWCHARTS
Community Infrastructure Levy notices: procedural requirements for issue, service and compliance

Checklist Many family-run enterprises often begin with a largely informal governance arrangement; relatives share a tacit grasp of duties and relationships, and decisions are taken swiftly at the kitchen table. By their nature these businesses are flexible and informal, with priorities typically guided by doing what is best for the family in line with the family’s values, rather than being driven solely by owners’ profit. However, as the business develops and more family members and other employees come on board, managing operations in this ad hoc way becomes progressively harder, as what was once straightforward to coordinate across a small group becomes complex to control as headcount and responsibilities increase. The pros and cons of formalising the family business are addressed in Practice Note: Family businesses. This checklist sets out questions an adviser can put to the family (or that the family can consider themselves) to help design an effective structure for the family business. The same questions will also help identify the matters to be covered in any...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Small company

NEWS
TMT weekly: EU CRA guidance, DSA transparency, UK Online Safety and child wellbeing consultations, Ofcom OSA update, CAP loot box disclosures, key media/defamation cases, and 6G security principles

In this issue: Information technology Internet Media Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Reputation management Telecommunications LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Information technology Commission consults on draft Guidance on EU Cyber Resilience Act The European Commission has opened a consultation on a draft Communication offering direction on how to interpret and apply in practice Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, the EU Cyber Resilience Act (EU CRA). In line with Article 26(1) EU CRA, this non-binding guidance seeks to support manufacturers, developers and other stakeholders in understanding their obligations and fostering a harmonised approach across the EU, with a particular emphasis on helping microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises meet compliance needs. the scope of the EU CRA, including free and open-source software and what constitutes a substantial modification; support period obligations; designation of important and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Security for costs on appeal: evidence, enforcement risk and proportionality under CPR 25.27/25.29—Court of Appeal guidance in Qatar Investment v Phoenix (England and Wales)

Qatar Investment and Project Developments Holding Co v Phoenix Ancient Art SA [2025] EWCA Civ 1300 What was the background? In this Court of Appeal matter, the respondents to the appeal (the claimants) applied, by way of an application, for security to cover their appeal costs. The appellants/defendants were Phoenix Ancient Art S.A., a Swiss company, together with Ali Aboutaam, a Swiss resident, and Hicham Aboutaam, resident in New York. The claimants had issued two separate claims against five defendants in total, of whom the first three were the present appellants: one action commenced in 2020 and a second in 2023 respectively. Each claim concerned the artefacts in issue, acquired and purchased from Phoenix, which the claimants alleged were counterfeit and inauthentic. The 2020 proceedings focused on a small chalcedony statuette depicting the goddess Nike. The 2023 proceedings concerned two further pieces, namely: a marble work titled the Head of Alexander the Great as Herakles, and a small chalcedony cameo described as the Phalera with an Imperial Eagle....

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
IP highlights: UK copyright/passing off label ruling, EU designs AG opinion, Brexit EU trade mark use deadline, UPC costs stance, UK exhaustion—updates and webinars (28 Aug 2025)

In this issue: Copyright & associated rights Designs Trade marks/passing off Patents General IP Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Copyright & associated rights Wine importer loses ‘battle of the bottles’ in copyright claim (Martin v Bodegas San Huberto SA) UK importers take heed—the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court has backed an artist’s claim that a label on wine bottles brought into and sold in the UK by a UK company infringed copyright in an original work and also amounted to passing off. The Argentinian supplier had commissioned a designer to craft an appropriate label, and the importer raised no questions about that choice. Of the three labels that formed the focus of the allegations, the court decided that one constituted a plainly substantial reproduction of the artist’s work—even though the copied element comprised only a very small segment of the original (Infopaq International...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Small company

PRACTICE NOTES
UK corporation tax: qualifying R&D expenditure for SME relief and RDEC (accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024), including subcontracting, staffing, software/data/cloud and subsidy rules

Qualifying R&D expenditure (pre-1 April 2024) This Practice Note sets out the scope of qualifying expenditure for two R&D relief schemes, each subject to detailed commencement and transitional provisions: the research and development relief for small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024—see Practice Notes: SME R&D relief—additional deduction (pre-1 April 2024) and SME R&D relief—tax credit (pre-1 April 2024); and the R&D expenditure credit scheme applying to accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024—see Practice Note: R&D expenditure credit (pre-1 April 2024). Together, this Practice Note refers to these as the pre-1 April 2024 schemes. For information about the reliefs generally applying to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, see Practice Notes: The merged R&D expenditure credit (post-1 April 2024) and Enhanced relief for R&D-intensive loss-making SMEs (post-1 April 2024). For details on what counts as qualifying R&D expenditure for those two post-1 April 2024 schemes, see Practice Note: Qualifying R&D expenditure...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK SME R&D relief (pre‑1 April 2024): additional deduction—eligibility, notifications, rates, €7.5m cap, RDEC interaction, pre‑trading, claiming and compliance

SME R&D relief—additional deduction (pre-1 April 2024) This Practice Note addresses the principal research and development (R&D) relief for small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for accounting periods beginning before 1 April 2024, subject to transitional provisions. For further detail, see Practice Note: SME R&D relief—tax credit (pre-1 April 2024). For the R&D expenditure credit that applies to periods beginning before 1 April 2024, see Practice Note: R&D expenditure credit (pre-1 April 2024). In this Practice Note, these two are collectively described as the pre-1 April 2024 schemes. For guidance on the schemes of relief for R&D generally applying to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, see Practice Notes: The merged R&D expenditure credit (post-1 April 2024) and Enhanced relief for R&D-intensive loss-making SMEs (post-1 April 2024). SME R&D relief—additional deduction Where the relevant conditions are satisfied, an SME company may claim an additional deduction equal to 186% of its qualifying research and development (R&D) expenditure when computing profits chargeable to corporation tax...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK LLP accounts: individual and group reporting requirements, content and exemptions under the Companies Act 2006 and Regulations

The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) provides comprehensive rules governing how a company prepares its annual accounts. Through the Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/1911 (the 2008 Regulations), selected elements are extended to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), with suitable adaptations. The Limited Liability Partnerships, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Audit) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/575 (the 2016 Regulations) introduced a range of amendments to the accounting framework for LLPs and qualifying partnerships. Further alterations affecting LLPs and other bodies were made by the Statutory Auditors Regulations 2017, SI 2017/1164. In most cases, the changes take effect for LLPs with financial years commencing on or after 17 June 2016; however, the stricter conditions on the small LLPs’ exemption from preparing group accounts apply to periods starting on or after 1 January 2017. This Practice Note, read alongside Practice Note: LLP Accounts—an outline of the statutory framework, distils the key obligations contained within these statutory provisions...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Small company

PRECEDENTS
Precedent client memo on disclosure, document preservation and legal professional privilege: guidance for employees on control, metadata and communications in civil litigation (England and Wales)

This template memorandum should be read and, if suitable, sent together with the relevant template letter to your client regarding disclosure: Draft letter to client about disclosure—small claims track Draft letter to client about disclosure Confidential and privileged [ insert date ] [ insert addressees: [ insert addressees: senior managers/relevant employees and former employees/IT managers ] ] [ [ insert case heading ] OR [ description of the case if pre-action ] ] [ [ We ] OR [ the company ] ] may encounter a legal dispute in relation to [ insert matter/transaction subject of dispute ]. If the dispute is not brought to a conclusion, it is probable that we will be required to disclose relevant documents, including electronic records, that are or have been within [ [ our ] OR [ the company’s ] ] control, whether or not they support our case. That said, some relevant documents are protected from inspection (that is, actually seen)...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
EMI Employee Share Options: UK FAQs on Grant, Exercise, Exit/PISCES Events, Leaver Consequences, Disqualifying Events and Tax

What is the [ insert name of EMI scheme ]? [ insert name of company establishing EMI scheme ] (the Company) has set up the [ insert name of EMI scheme ] scheme (EMI Scheme). Under the EMI Scheme, the Company may, from time to time, issue enterprise management incentives (EMI) qualifying share options as well as unapproved share options. Unless this document states otherwise, you have been awarded EMI qualifying share options under your grant. These FAQs summarise the principal terms of the EMI Scheme and highlight certain tax advantages available to participants. The comprehensive provisions of the EMI Scheme are contained in the option grant documentation in full. Where any inconsistency arises between the EMI Scheme rules and/or your option agreement and these FAQs, the plan rules will prevail. What are EMI options? The EMI Scheme under which your option was granted is a highly adaptable, tax-efficient arrangement designed for small and medium-sized companies and governed by specific legislation in this area. You have been...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Directors’ resolution template authorising small loan to a director under UK Companies Act 2006 s207(1) (aggregated cap £10,000) with key terms

That the directors be authorised to extend a loan by the Company to [ insert name of the director ], provided that the loan sum does not exceed £10,000 when taken together with the value of all other relevant transactions and arrangements cited in section 207(1) of the Companies Act 2006. The loan shall be issued on the following terms: [ Insert the key terms on which the loan will be made, eg the amount, the purpose, interest payable, repayment date, events of default, security arrangements ]...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Small company

Q&As
PSC inside IR35: Is the end client responsible for SSP?

IR35 The off-payroll IR35 framework applies where: from 6 April 2017, the engager is a public authority; and from 6 April 2020, a private sector organisation (other than one that is ‘small’) hires a worker via an intermediary, for example a personal service company (PSC). The legislation takes effect in respect of payments made on or after those dates, even where such payments relate to services delivered before those dates. This applies without regard to precisely when the work was performed. In essence, and in practical terms, the off-payroll IR35 rules move the task of deciding whether IR35 applies from the PSC to the end client in relevant cases and, where IR35 does apply, they place the duty to deduct income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) on the party nearest to the PSC in the contractual chain (whether that is the end client contracting directly with the PSC, or another intermediary within more complicated contractual structures). IR35 is engaged...

Read More Right Arrow