Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Special damages

Special damages meaning

What does Special damages mean?
In practice, special damages are monetary compensation for quantifiable financial loss caused by a breach of contract or tort/delict. The term is a descriptive, case law and pleading concept rather than a statutory definition. They are specifically pleaded with full particulars and vouching (receipts, invoices, payslips) and must be strictly proved, typically set out in a schedule of loss. Typical heads include: loss of earnings to trial, medical and rehabilitation expenses, repair or replacement costs, hire charges, travel and accommodation, care and assistance, business losses and other out-of-pocket expenses. The duty to mitigate applies. Interest may run from the date of loss or another specified date, subject to jurisdictional rules. Usage by jurisdiction: - England & Wales and Northern Ireland: “special damages” usually denotes past pecuniary loss; future pecuniary losses are commonly pleaded separately as “future loss”. - Scotland: the label is not a term of art; analogous claims are for patrimonial loss (past and future), distinct from solatium. - Ireland: the term generally covers both past and future pecuniary loss, often pleaded as special damages to date and future special damages. Special damages are distinct from general damages, which cover non-pecuniary loss (for example, pain, suffering and loss of amenity).
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Special damages

CHECKLISTS
Fatal accident damages checklist: who can claim and recoverable losses under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 and Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (England and Wales)

Checklist This Checklist summarises the potential claims against a defendant where the claimant in a personal injury case has died before trial. It reviews the principal statutory regimes—the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 (LR(MP)A 1934) and the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976)—and indicates who may bring the claim and the recoverable heads of loss. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Law Reform Act or Fatal Accidents Act? and Claims involving a fatality—heads of damage... Cause of action Claim on behalf of the deceased’s estate (under LR(MP)A 1934) Who can bring the claim? By the administrator or executor of the estate. A valid will or Grant of Letters of Administration will be required... Heads of loss Guidance on the recoverable heads of loss is provided by LR(MP)A 1934 and FAA 1976 and in the referenced Practice Notes...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Past pecuniary losses in personal injury: practitioner checklist on heads of loss, evidence, quantification, mitigation, interest, CRU/NHS charges, credit hire and schedules of loss

This Checklist This Checklist helps pinpoint typical recoverable historic financial outgoings and losses (special damages or historic pecuniary losses) arising before trial. It also aids in collating suitable evidence and highlights the questions that commonly emerge when valuing these losses, setting out recurring issues for consideration as appropriate in practice. For additional guidance, see: Past expenses and losses—overview...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Special damages

NEWS
PI and Clinical Negligence Update: key case law (psychiatric injury, Animals Act, anonymity), QOCS and costs; MoJ CFO rate cut; CPRC minutes; NHS Resolution–CQC MoU; new regulations

In this issue: Key PI and Clinical negligence developments Civil procedure rule committee minutes Psychiatric and occupational stress Injuries caused by animals Claims involving a child Claims involving a fatality Costs and funding Other PI and Clinical negligence news LexTalk® PI & Clinical Negligence: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts LexisNexis® Webinars Useful information Key PI and Clinical negligence developments MoJ announces reduction in CFO’s interest rates The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed reduced interest rates for the Courts Funds Office (CFO) special and basic accounts. The special account rate moves from 4.75% to 4.50%, while the basic account rate shifts from 3.56% to 3.38%. Effective from 3 March 2025, the revision follows the Bank of England’s base rate cut on 6 February 2025 and is intended to ensure the CFO Service can continue to cover operational costs. See: LNB News 04/03/2025 38...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
TMT weekly update: AI governance, Online Safety Act thresholds and deepfake offences, CMA digital markets guidance, data protection opinions, advertising enforcement, and recent case law—9 January 2025

In this issue: New technologies Information technology Internet Data protection Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Reputation management LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information New technologies iQIYI brings a landmark copyright claim against Chinese AI start-up MiniMax. According to MLex, the China-based video-streaming service has filed proceedings in a local court, accusing the domestic artificial intelligence start-up of infringement linked to AI model training and content production. See: iQIYI sues Chinese AI startup MiniMax for copyright infringement in landmark case. MLex has learned. Appeal Tracker: Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Ltd In Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 825, the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal on 29 November 2024. Earlier, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) upheld the hearing officer’s appeal from...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
CPRC 3 Oct 2025: Part 82 CMP reforms; Part 75 consultation; PD 52D appeals update; CPR 7.11 HRA s9 claims; FRC stocktake; PF10 anonymity orders (England and Wales)

Note: the CPRC has stopped sharing the background papers alongside the minutes, so no explanatory documents accompany this News Analysis to set out the matters discussed. A copy of the minutes appears here now: Minutes of CPRC meeting 3 October 2025. Welcome, apologies and introductory remarks (item 1) The Chair greeted members at the opening meeting of the legal year. Minutes from the 4 July 2025 meeting (see News Analysis: Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—4 July 2025) were approved, and the action log was recorded as noted. Part 82—closed material procedure (item 2) MoJ officials outlined the subsequent tranche of reforms from Sir Duncan Ouseley’s 2022 CMP report findings. The Committee approved a revised new rule 82.26A, to be renamed ‘Special Advocate Position Statement’ and reframed by reference to CPR 5.4B and 5.4C provisions. Subject to minor drafting tweaks, the rule will feature in the winter update package. Regarding the proposed new practice direction, the Committee stressed engaging with judges and practitioners experienced in CMP,...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Special damages

PRACTICE NOTES
Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence July 2025: discount rate, costs/QOCS, RTA reforms, CPR updates and leading cases (England and Wales) [Archived]

PI & Clinical negligence horizon scanner—July 2025 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and is not maintained. It summarises the principal legal developments relevant to personal injury and clinical negligence practitioners as at July 2025. For developments predating this horizon scanner, see PI and Clinical Negligence horizon scanning and key cases—overview. Key PI and clinical negligence developments The personal injury discount rate—a review In late 2024, the Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood MP, revealed the outcome of her five‑month review of the discount rate, initiated in July 2024. One month after the new +0.5% discount rate took effect, Thea Wilson (barrister at 12 King’s Bench Walk) assesses its impact on cases, the responses from claimant and defendant representatives, and the consequences of the change for legal practitioners. See News Analysis: The personal injury discount rate—a review. MoJ announces reduction in CFO’s interest rates The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced lower interest rates for the Courts Funds Office’s (CFO) special and basic accounts...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Ireland: General Damages in Personal Injuries Claims—PIRB, PIG/Book of Quantum, Court Jurisdictions and Costs, Multiple Injuries, Fatal and Psychiatric Claims, Periodic/Interim Payments, Minors, Contributory Negligence

This Practice Note addresses general damages in relation to personal injuries and will consider: What are general damages Personal Injuries Resolution Board (PIRB) Level of damages in each court Book of Quantum (BOQ) Personal Injuries Guidelines (PIG) Assessing damages for multiple injuries How payments of damages awards are made Reduction in awards of general damages What are general damages General damages are compensation awarded to a person for the pain and suffering experienced as a result of a personal injury. They cover harm endured to date and what is anticipated in the future, and include both physical harm and psychiatric injury. They are distinct from special damages, which reimburse out-of-pocket losses (such as medical or travel expenses) and loss of earnings arising from the injury. When valuing general damages, there should be an appraisal of the reduction in the injured person’s capacity to enjoy life. The different categories of general damages are outlined below. For further...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Interim injunctions in England and Wales: the American Cyanamid test—core principles, variations, mandatory orders and section 25 CJJA support

This Practice Note examines the American Cyanamid test used by the courts to determine whether to grant temporary injunctive relief. It sets out the sources of the court’s authority and the principles that inform a judge’s discretion when considering an interim injunction application under those guidelines. For wider guidance on injunctive relief, including the distinction between interim and final, and between prohibitory and mandatory orders, see Practice Note: Injunctions—guiding principles. For interim remedies focused on preserving assets and/or evidence, see: Freezing injunctions—guiding principles Proprietary freezing injunctions Search and imaging orders—guiding principles Interim delivery up orders and preservation of property This content should also be read in conjunction with: Interim injunctions—on notice applications Interim injunctions—without notice applications Interim injunctions—drafting the order Guiding principles for interim injunctions The jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions arises from section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and CPR 25.1(1)(a), as outlined in Practice Note: Injunctions—guiding principles—The...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Special damages

PRECEDENTS
Fatal Accidents: Schedule of Loss and Dependency Precedent (England and Wales) - LR(MP)A 1934 and FAA 1976, services and financial dependency, interest, Ogden tables at 0.5%

Schedule of loss & dependency in a fatal accident claim [ IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [ INSERT ] OR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ] [ [ Specify division ] ] [ [ Insert location ] DISTRICT REGISTRY ] Claim No: Between AB, Claimant (the Widow and Executrix of the estate of A, deceased) and C Limited, Defendant Note On 2 December 2024 the Lord Chancellor confirmed that the discount rate would move to a positive 0.5%. That positive 0.5% rate takes effect from 11 January 2025. Under Schedule A1 to the Damages Act 1996, later reviews must occur within five years of the end of the previous review, meaning the next review must begin on or before 2 December 2029. The Claimant retains the right to revise, modify or supplement this schedule at any time up to and including trial...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance clauses for commercial contracts: long-form warranties, due diligence, suspension/termination, indemnity; short-form performance and affiliates/ownership options

1 Sanctions (long form) For clause 1, the following terms are to be interpreted as set out below: Losses means all damages, liabilities, demands, costs and expenses [including all legal and other professional fees, costs and expenses], claims, actions and proceedings [(including all consequential, direct, indirect, special or incidental loss or punitive damages or loss, fines, penalties, interest and loss of profit or any other form of economic loss (including loss of reputation))]; Sanctioned Activity means any activity that falls within sanctions imposed by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctioning Body means the United Kingdom, United States of America, United Nations, European Union and any other applicable local, national or multinational government agency, department, official, parliament, public or statutory person or any government or professional body, regulatory or supervisory authority, board or other body responsible for imposing and/or administering sanctions; Sanctioned Entity means any person or entity that is, or that is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by a person or entity that is,...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Witness Statement (Precedent) for Approval of Settlement of Protected Party’s Damages Claim, with Schedule of Loss and CFA/ATE Costs, under CPR 21 and 46.4 (England and Wales)

Submitted on behalf of the claimant Statement of evidence by [ insert initial and surname of witness ] Witness statement number: [ insert number of witness statement in relation to the witness ] Exhibits: [ insert initials and number of each exhibit referred to ] Date statement signed: [ insert date ] [ Date of translation: [ insert date ] ] IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [ location ] Claim number: [ insert number ] Parties [ name ] Claimant (a protected party by [ name ] his [ family relationship ] litigation friend) and [ name ] Defendant WITNESS STATEMENT OF [ insert name ] I, [ insert full name ], of [ if the witness is making the statement in their professional, business or other occupational capacity, insert the address at which they work, the position they hold and the name of their firm or employer ], acting as Legal Representative for the Claimant, intend...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Special damages

Q&As
Professional deputy costs: from deputy or special damages?

If the claimant qualifies as a protected party within the Court of Protection’s remit, fees imposed by that Court, both historic and prospective, may properly form part of the claim made. Further charges will also be incurred where a deputy is appointed to manage the claimant’s property and financial affairs. These charges and expenses can be set out within the schedule of past and future loss and damage as distinct heads of damage...

Read More Right Arrow