Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Special purpose vehicle (SPV)

Special purpose vehicle (SPV) meaning

What does Special purpose vehicle (SPV) mean?
A special purpose vehicle (SPV), also called a special purpose entity (SPE), is a company set up for a narrow, predefined business purpose—typically to acquire, hold and manage specific assets and to raise funding secured on those assets—so risks are ring‑fenced from sponsors and other group companies. The term is descriptive rather than defined in legislation or case law, and is used across banking, structured finance, securitisation, project finance and real estate finance in the UK and Ireland. Key features include separate legal personality; limited objects and negative covenants to restrict activities; independence (often with professional directors); and “bankruptcy‑remote” structuring, commonly using limited recourse and non‑petition provisions. Many SPVs are “orphan” vehicles, with shares held by a trustee to avoid consolidation risks. An SPV may grant security over its assets to lenders or noteholders and issue asset‑backed debt (for example, notes, loan notes or commercial paper). Security is typically by fixed and floating charges in England & Wales and Northern Ireland; by fixed securities (including standard security over heritable property) and floating charge in Scotland; and by equivalent Irish security. Usage is broadly consistent across these jurisdictions; in Ireland, securitisations frequently use Section 110 companies for tax neutrality.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Special purpose vehicle (SPV)

NEWS
FTT: SDLT group relief under FA 2003 Sch 7 denied—arrangements had a main purpose of tax avoidance despite commercial rationale (Tower One St George Wharf v HMRC)

The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 154 (TC) A corporate group was progressing a site for residential use as a development project. The concluding phase involved a 50‑storey tower, which they planned to place into a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to ring‑fence exposure to risk and potential liabilities, and to secure greater financial flexibility for the project as a whole. After consulting their tax advisers, the group executed a sequence of transactions on the very same day intended to step up the tax cost of the scheme, so the SPV would be treated as acquiring it at market value, with no tax liabilities arising along the chain overall. In outline, the company that owned the property granted a 999‑year lease to another group entity, B64. The shares in B64 were then purchased by...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Court of Appeal: FA 2003 s54(4) Case 3 requires successful group relief claim, but s75A counteracts scheme; SDLT charged on market value (Tower One St George Wharf v HMRC)

The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC [2025] EWCA Civ 1588 A corporate group developed a residential scheme, with the concluding phase being the transfer of a 50‑storey tower block to a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to ring‑fence risks, contain potential liabilities and improve financial flexibility. After consulting tax advisers, the group executed a set of same‑day steps intended to ‘step up’ the tax cost of the project, so the SPV would be treated as acquiring it at market value without tax charges arising en route. In broad terms, the property‑owning company granted a 999‑year lease to another group entity, B64. The appellant, incorporated to serve as the SPV, then acquired the shares in B64, and the lease was subsequently transferred to it by way of distribution. After an HMRC enquiry, the appellant accepted the planning had not produced the anticipated tax advantage. HMRC then assessed the appellant to SDLT on the lease’s market value at the residential rate. The company appealed on the basis that it...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Special purpose vehicle (SPV)

PRACTICE NOTES
SPVs in aviation finance and leasing: subsidiaries, orphan trusts and limited partnerships—tax and insolvency remoteness, jurisdiction and registration choices, share security, payment flows, limited recourse and parent comfort

Types of special purpose vehicle and orphan trust The deployment of special purpose vehicle structures is widespread in aviation finance. They offer lenders several advantages, including tax benefits and a bankruptcy-remote platform for the financing. A special purpose vehicle (SPV), also known as a single purpose company (SPC), is a legal entity established for a limited aim; in aviation finance this is commonly to own an aircraft for a particular transaction. There are numerous forms of SPV used in aviation finance, with the principal categories being: subsidiary companies orphan trusts limited partnerships Each of these is considered below. The type of SPV selected will vary on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Subsidiary companies Subsidiary companies are typically limited liability companies incorporated in a tax-friendly jurisdiction...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK tax on sales and acquisitions of commercial property SPVs: share v asset, buyer diligence and seller issues, SDLT/LBTT/LTT, financing, VAT and SPA/W&I protections

Tax is a key consideration when selecting an appropriate structure for holding UK commercial property. The prevailing route for investing in UK commercial property is typically a UK‑incorporated, tax‑resident limited company. Non‑UK investors have also gravitated towards offshore ownership for investment, commonly via a non‑UK resident special purpose vehicle (SPV). Following reforms to the taxation of gains realised by non‑UK residents on UK immovable property from 6 April 2019, and to the taxation of property income of non‑UK resident companies from 6 April 2020, non‑UK resident companies that hold UK commercial assets now fall within UK corporation tax on gains (subject to certain exemptions) and on rental income. As a consequence, a number of the core tax attractions of using non‑UK resident SPVs to own UK commercial property have been curtailed. Nevertheless, acquiring UK commercial property through an offshore SPV remains a widely used and popular structure for many investors. It can still continue to provide a saving in stamp duty land tax when compared with purchasing the underlying...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK securitisation and asset-based lending: structure, true sale, SPV bankruptcy remoteness, enforcement (capital market exception), and restructuring challenges

Rationale Securitisation is the transfer of sizeable portfolios of income‑generating assets to a special purpose vehicle (SPV). The SPV finances the purchase price by issuing interest‑bearing securities—commonly termed ‘bonds’ or ‘notes’—into the capital markets. These securities benefit from security over the assets and/or the cashflows they produce (the ‘receivables’). Cashflows from the receivables are applied to pay interest and to repay principal on the securities. Types of receivables that can be securitised include: mortgage payments bank loan repayments lease/rental payments credit card repayments insurance premium payments Benefits of securitisation include: cheaper borrowing—the SPV may achieve a higher credit rating than the debtor company (originator). Either the obligors for the receivables carry a stronger rating than the originator, or credit rating agencies may find it simpler to rate a single asset (the receivables) rather than the originator, which presents more variables...

Read More Right Arrow