Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Spread duration

Spread duration meaning

What does Spread duration mean?
In practice, spread duration describes a bond’s price sensitivity to movements in its credit spread (as opposed to interest rates). It is typically expressed as the percentage change in price for a 100 basis point change in the bond’s option‑adjusted spread (OAS). Holding the risk‑free yield curve constant, a higher spread duration indicates greater exposure to price falls if spreads widen and price gains if spreads tighten. It is distinct from (interest‑rate) duration. This is a market and analytical term rather than one defined in legislation or case law, and usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Legal relevance includes: drafting and reviewing prospectus and listing risk factors for bond and securitisation offerings; setting or assessing portfolio guidelines and covenants in investment management agreements (for example, limits on spread duration); structuring and documenting hedging strategies (including credit derivatives) that target spread risk; and expert evidence or valuation in disputes concerning losses from credit spread moves. Where bonds embed options (for example, callable/putable or structured credit), spread duration is usually calculated with OAS to reflect option effects.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Spread duration

PRACTICE NOTES
Co-funded litigation funding agreements: negotiating structure, pricing, documentation and communication; majority and representative roles; managing default risk

Although every litigation funding agreement (LFA) and the papers that sit alongside it differ by funder and the nuances of the dispute being financed, certain core points must still be tackled through the various stages of negotiation, in any event. This Practice Note forms part of a concise series by Tanya Lansky and Tets Ishikawa, Managing Directors at LionFish Group Ltd, intended to equip those involved in the negotiation and assessment of LFAs and related documents with clearer insight into the key considerations. Co-funding As the market has matured and inflation has pushed up funding budgets, it is now far more commonplace for funders to spread the investment exposure in any given case with one or more peers. Some funders agree to the full LFA and later novate or dispose of sub-participation interests over a portion of their exposure to other funders or investors. In that arrangement, the lead funder remains the sole funder for LFA purposes, with others often adopting a background role for the duration of...

Read More Right Arrow