Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Standard orders

Standard orders meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Family expert
What does Standard orders mean?
In practice, standard orders (standard form orders) are pre-drafted, judiciary‑approved templates for common court orders, used to promote consistency, accuracy and efficiency in drafting and sealing. In England and Wales, the term usually refers to the Standard Family Orders (SFOs) issued by the President of the Family Division and published on the judiciary website. Their use is strongly encouraged in the Family Court and Family Division of the High Court. Judges retain discretion to adapt or depart from them. The SFOs cover, among other areas, children cases, financial remedies, enforcement, committal/contempt and case management. They are periodically updated to reflect the Family Procedure Rules and relevant case law. Advocates are expected to submit draft orders using the appropriate template, which typically speeds approval, reduces argument over wording and cuts costs. Across the UK and Ireland the expression is descriptive rather than statutory. Scotland relies on court‑approved “styles” of interlocutors and prescribed forms; Northern Ireland and Ireland mainly use prescribed forms and precedents under their procedural rules (e.g. Family Proceedings Rules (NI), Rules of the Superior Courts and Circuit Court Rules). The practical aim is consistent: standard wording for routine orders, with judicial flexibility where needed.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Standard orders

CHECKLISTS
Freezing injunctions in corporate and personal insolvency: step-by-step checklist for urgent applications, evidence, model orders, undertakings, WFOs, disclosure and enforcement (England and Wales)

Introduction to freezing injunctions and scope of this checklist A freezing injunction (also known as a freezing order) is a temporary court order that prevents a respondent from disposing of or transferring its assets out of the relevant jurisdiction—namely England and Wales—or, in the case of a worldwide freezing order (WFO), from moving them anywhere in the world. The court’s principal aim in granting such relief is to preserve the respondent’s assets so that, if the applicant later obtains judgment against the respondent, there will be assets available for recovery by the applicant and, if necessary, enforcement action. This Checklist explains how to make an application for a freezing injunction where claims are contemplated or already underway in a corporate or personal insolvency context. As the precise circumstances of each matter must be assessed, this Checklist does not claim to be exhaustive; rather, it provides an overview of the key considerations at each stage when seeking an order of this kind. The focus throughout is asset preservation pending determination...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Enforcing Child Arrangements Orders: Procedure for Unpaid Work Enforcement Orders under the Children Act 1989 (England and Wales)

Procedural Guide This Procedural Guide explains the process for seeking an enforcement order under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) to secure compliance with a child arrangements order (CAO). Such an order may require the respondent to complete unpaid work. It sets out details of the following: Who can apply Pre-action requirements Criminal standard of proof Orders the court may make Restrictions on making an enforcement order The procedure applies where a CAO has a warning notice properly attached and it is alleged the order has been breached, making enforcement necessary. Enforcing contact provisions can be difficult where the parent with whom the child lives is opposed to contact. Under ChA 1989 the court has extended powers to enforce all provisions of CAOs, not just those about contact but also those concerning a child’s living arrangements...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
First Appointment in Financial Remedy Proceedings (standard procedure) under FPR 2010: procedure, directions, expert evidence, interim orders, NCDR adjournments, and FDR listing with post‑appointment steps (England and Wales)

STOP PRESS: The Financial Remedies Guide 2026, issued on 13 March 2026 by Mr Justice Peel (National Lead Judge of the Financial Remedies Court) and His Honour Judge Hess (Deputy National Lead Judge of the Financial Remedies Court), and approved by the President of the Family Division, replaces and supersedes the following: Statement on the efficient handling of financial remedy cases assigned to a High Court judge, whether sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice or in any other venue (1 February 2016) (the High Court judge level efficiency statement) Statement on the efficient conduct of financial remedy hearings in the Financial Remedies Court below High Court judge level (11 January 2022) (the below High Court judge level efficiency statement) Financial Remedies Court Primary Principles document (11 January 2022) Notice from the Financial Remedies Court on electronic bundles (19 April 2022) Allocation of financial remedies cases to High Court judge level (21 May 2024) This document is being updated...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Standard orders

FLOWCHARTS
Protective costs orders (PCOs) in environmental litigation: flowchart of scenarios and application routes

This Checklist supports the preparation of terms and conditions for the sale of goods. It highlights key points when producing standard B2B terms or a goods sale agreement. It covers legal, regulatory and practical aspects of selling and supplying goods and is written from a seller/supplier perspective. For general guidance on contracts for the sale of goods, see Practice Notes: Contracts for the sale and supply of goods—business to business and Implied terms in contracts for goods and services. For broader guidance on key provisions in commercial contracts, see Practice Note: Key terms and conditions in commercial contracts. General considerations Engage with departmental stakeholders to identify concerns and gather customer feedback that should be addressed in the terms. Map how goods will be provided and any back-end processes, eg delivery or returns, that need to be reflected in the terms. Check for pre-existing commitments, such as restrictive covenants or exclusive sale or purchasing arrangements, that could prevent a bespoke supply contract...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Section 21 HA 1988 possession of assured shorthold tenancies in England: standard procedure flowchart—preconditions, notice periods, issuing N5/N119, hearings, possession orders, and enforcement

The flow diagram outlines when an executor might renounce probate, the effects this has on administering the estate, and which other individuals may apply for a grant instead, in their place. It also additionally covers the circumstance in which a proving sole, or sole-surviving, executor dies, and explains how the chain of representation interacts with renunciation by their own executor(s). If one of several appointed executors dies after obtaining a grant, but there remain surviving, proving executors named in that grant, those executors will carry on acting...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Standard orders

NEWS
UK and EU environmental law weekly update: emissions trading, energy and nuclear, ESG reporting, UK REACH, waste and producer responsibility, biodiversity, marine, water and litigation—26 February 2026

In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental disputes and proceedings Environmental permits and consents Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Waste producer responsibility regimes Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change DESNZ releases quarterly waste data reporting template for the UK ETS. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has issued a template for quarterly waste data submissions under the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS). It is designed for waste operators to use when sending quarterly data reports to their regulator during the voluntary monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) period. See: LNB News 19/02/2026 50. AFME responds to European Commission consultation on climate resilience legislative framework. The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) has provided...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Debarring orders confined to rate do not bar impecuniosity on hire period: credit hire and storage claims in MIB v Houston [2025] EWHC 3178 (KB), England and Wales

Motor Insurers Bureau v Houston [2025] EWHC 3178 (KB) What are the practical implications of this case? Although the outcome may catch seasoned credit hire practitioners off guard, it was driven in large part by the precise language of the debarring order in this case. The order confined any future debarring strictly to the question of rate and made no reference to reliance on impecuniosity for the hire period or for any wider purposes; appellant counsel on appeal suggested this flowed from a legacy version of a standard form. Practitioners familiar with credit hire litigation will know that, more often than not, directions orders bar a claimant from reliance on impecuniosity for all purposes following a failure to provide financial disclosure. Even so, the judgment is a clear reminder that the courts will apply the ordinary and natural meaning to the words of any order, and practitioners should take care to verify the exact wording of a debarring order in every case. That is not, however, to suggest the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Private Client weekly briefing: Court of Protection, tax and HMRC updates, digital assets and insolvency, contentious trusts, and Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland developments—2 May 2024

In this issue: Court of Protection UK taxes for Private Client HMRC Manuals updates Family businesses and ownership structures Insolvency—Private Client Digital assets and cryptoassets Contentious trusts and estates Pensions, insurance and tax-efficient investments Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland Question of the week Additional Private Client updates Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis®PSL community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Useful information Court of Protection Court of Protection proposes travel guidance for cases with a risk of future forced marriage (Luton Borough Council v G) The Court of Protection sanctioned a six-month interim forced marriage protection order (FMPO) concerning AG and exercised the inherent jurisdiction to govern AG’s contact with her parents. This followed material showing parental control and coercion, the prospect of AG travelling abroad for ‘a wedding’, and indications that, if parental contact matched her...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Standard orders

PRACTICE NOTES
Family arbitration and court oversight in England and Wales: stays, consent orders, and challenges post-Haley for financial remedies and children under the IFLA scheme and Arbitration Acts 1996/2025

This Practice Note clearly explains the courts’ function within the context of family arbitration. In matters concerning families, any arbitration normally proceeds under the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) scheme. The courts continue to have overall jurisdiction over any family arbitration award or determination and will endorse the award or determination provided it falls within recognised limits, thereby fully respecting the parties’ autonomy. For further practical guidance on, among other things, the conduct of arbitration in family cases, the principal advantages of arbitration, the scope of the IFLA scheme and the arbitrator’s powers, please see Practice Note: Family arbitration—introduction. Acting on Law Commission proposals to reform the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and to bring in measures to bolster arbitrator immunity, enhance overall case efficiency and clarify the court’s powers, a draft Bill reflecting those recommendations was formally laid before Parliament and subsequently obtained Royal Assent on 25 February 2025. Accordingly, the Arbitration Act 2025 (AA 2025) modifies AA 1996 from 1 August 2025 by virtue of the Arbitration...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Commercial Court application notices: completing forms N244(CC), N244(LCC) and N244(RCC), with key guidance on draft orders, evidence, time estimates and hearing arrangements (England and Wales)

Note From 1 January 2026, the Commercial Court and the London Commercial Court are running a pilot under CPR PD 51ZH. By default, specified materials used in public hearings—such as witness statements and skeleton arguments—will be accessible to the public. Practitioners issuing applications in these courts should acquaint themselves with the pilot and take suitable measures to safeguard clients when drafting any impacted documents. For further direction, see Practice Note: Non-party access to court documents and information in civil proceedings. This Practice Note explains how to complete an application notice using form N244(CC) for proceedings in the Commercial Court. For broader guidance on applications, refer to the following Practice Notes: How to make an application for a court order (CPR 23) Making an application in the Commercial Courts Form N244(CC) In civil proceedings, applications are ordinarily made by application notice—see Practice Note: Informal applications for when the court may allow an application without one. In most courts, the standard application...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Post-DDSA 2020 procedure after service for matrimonial and civil partnership orders: acknowledgements, disputed cases, 20-week period, joint-to-sole switches and conditional order applications (England and Wales)

This Practice Note This Practice Note sets out the actions a respondent should take once served with an application for a matrimonial or civil partnership order in proceedings begun under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020). It specifies the deadline for filing the acknowledgement of service, clarifies when a case is disputed, and explains the 20‑week period. It also describes the route for an applicant (or joint applicants) to request a conditional order. DDSA 2020 came into effect on 6 April 2022. Proceedings issued by the court on or after 6 April 2022 are governed by DDSA 2020 and by the procedural amendments in the Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955 (FPR 2010). For more on the reforms introduced, see Practice Note: Introduction to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020. Proceedings issued by the court on or before 5 April 2022 will continue in line with the pre‑DDSA 2020 framework, whether submitted through the His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) online service or using...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Standard orders

PRECEDENTS
Financial remedies on divorce/dissolution: procedure, Form E disclosure, FDR/private FDR, principles, costs and orders—client guide (England and Wales)

STOP PRESS: The Financial Remedies Guide 2026 Published on 13 March 2026 by Mr Justice Peel (National Lead Judge of the Financial Remedies Court) and His Honour Judge Hess (Deputy National Lead Judge of the Financial Remedies Court), and approved by the President of the Family Division, the Guide supersedes and replaces: the Statement on the efficient conduct of financial remedy cases assigned to a High Court judge, whether at the Royal Courts of Justice or elsewhere (1 February 2016) (the High Court judge level efficiency statement) the Statement on the efficient conduct of financial remedy hearings in the Financial Remedies Court below High Court judge level (11 January 2022) (the below High Court judge level efficiency statement) the Financial Remedies Court Primary Principles (11 January 2022) the Notice from the Financial Remedies Court concerning electronic bundles (19 April 2022) the Allocation of financial remedies cases to High Court judge level (21 May 2024) This document is being updated...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Special Conditions amending IChemE Red Book (2013) Lump Sum Contract: design responsibility, site risk, security and warranties, insurance, payment and adjudication, CDM/Dutyholder compliance (England and Wales)

Special Conditions: Amendments to the General Conditions of Contract of the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) Form of Contract—Lump Sum Contracts, the Red Book, fifth edition (2013) Special Conditions The General Conditions in the IChemE Red Book, fifth edition (2013) shall apply as altered below: Agreement Paragraph 8: remove ‘6.3’. Paragraph 14: after ‘fax number’ include: ‘or email address’. Add ‘Email Address’ to the contact details for both the Purchaser and the Contractor. Paragraph 16: delete the paragraph and replace with ‘Not used’. 1. Definitions, interpretation, waiver and Notices Sub-clause 1.1 Within the definition of Cost, insert ‘, reasonably and necessarily’ immediately after ‘properly’. Within the definition of Legislation, add at the end: (including Acts of Parliament and subordinate instruments; orders; rules and/or regulations made thereunder; and/or the rules; regulations and/or bye-laws made by any body of competent jurisdiction in respect of which the Contractor or Purchaser (as appropriate) has a legal obligation to comply,...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Employment Tribunal case management directions and orders template: schedules of loss, disclosure, bundles, witness evidence, experts, preliminary issues and skeleton arguments (England, Wales and Scotland)

Standard case management directions The Claimant must supply the Respondent with a schedule of loss by 4:00pm on [ insert date ] [ along with any materials pertinent to mitigation of loss and any papers that substantiate the amounts stated in the schedule ]. The Claimant must revise the schedule of loss a fortnight before the substantive hearing. [ A list of issues to be settled on or before 4:00pm on [ insert date ]. OR The Claimant to deliver a draft list of issues to the Respondent on or before 4:00pm on [ insert date ], and the Respondent to return any revisions on or before 4:00pm on [ insert date ]. ] The Respondent must serve a counter-schedule of loss on or before 4:00pm on [ insert date ], identifying which parts of the schedule of loss are challenged and the reasons, together with any alternative figures and computations advanced...

Read More Right Arrow