Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Standing Orders

Standing Orders meaning

/ˈstandɪŋ/ /ˈɔːdə/
What does Standing Orders mean?
Standing Orders are the written procedural rules that govern how a legislature arranges and conducts its business, including the order of business, legislative stages, scrutiny of statutory instruments, admissibility of amendments and questions, time allocation/timetabling, quorums, divisions (voting) and the operation of committees. They also regulate public business and private business. Each House or Assembly adopts, amends and may suspend or dispense with its Standing Orders by motion, and they are published. The term is a procedural expression rather than a defined statutory or case‑law concept, though the making of Standing Orders is required (and sometimes constrained) by constitutional or statutory provisions. In the UK, the House of Commons Standing Orders and House of Lords Standing Orders (including for Public and for Private Business) govern Westminster procedure, interpreted in practice with guidance from Erskine May. The Scottish Parliament, Senedd Cymru and Northern Ireland Assembly each make Standing Orders under, respectively, the Scotland Act 1998, Government of Wales Act 2006 and Northern Ireland Act 1998. In Ireland, Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann adopt Standing Orders under Article 15 of the Constitution (Oireachtas standing orders). Usage is broadly consistent across these jurisdictions. Outside parliaments, local authorities and other public bodies also operate under standing...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Standing Orders

CHECKLISTS
TOLATA 1996 section 14 applications: procedure, criteria, evidence, Part 7/8, Part 36, orders (interests and sale), costs, enforcement and forms (England and Wales)

This Procedural Guide explains how to pursue an application under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) by a trustee of land, or by a beneficiary with an interest in property held on a trust of land. It provides direction on: the threshold for bringing an application and the pre-action protocol Part 36 offers under the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR), SI 1998/3132 evidential needs and the range of orders the court may make An application under TOLATA 1996, s 14 can be brought by a trustee of land or a beneficiary with an interest in property subject to a trust of land. In addition, any other person with an interest in that property, for example a mortgage company, has standing to commence a claim. The court enjoys a wide discretion to make directions about the exercise of trustees’ functions, or concerning the character and scope of beneficiaries’ interests, which may include ordering a...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Standing Orders

NEWS
UK corporate crime update: court backlogs, POCA disclosure orders, sanctions/OFSI changes, DUAA 2025, FCA Woodford, HSE reviews, AML developments and prosecutions—2 October 2025

In this issue: Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Appeal and judicial review Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Food safety and hygiene offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Local authority prosecutions Money laundering International LexTalk®Corporate Crime: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Criminal procedure and evidence Court delays soar as backlogs break records Between April and June 2025, the criminal courts in England and Wales amassed an unprecedented caseload of almost 440,000, with incoming matters exceeding disposals and a system hampered by long-standing funding shortfalls. In response, the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with The Rt Hon David Lammy MP, confirmed extra resources to accelerate outcomes for...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
High Court dismisses judicial review of Teesside CCUS DCO; policy support non-justiciable; EN-1 applied to GHG significance; reasons and need findings sufficient (England and Wales)

R (on the application of Dr Andrew Boswell) v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero [2024] EWHC 2128 (Admin) What are the practical implications of this case? The court observed that the Claimant is deliberately overlooking national policy on the pathway to net zero and the necessity of CCS/CCUS. His real dispute is with the SoS’s stance—shared by the Climate Change Committee—in backing this project. He is attempting to undermine the policy basis for the Scheme by alleging a contradiction in the SoS’s reasoning where none exists. The foundation of the SoS’s position is plainly set out in the policy materials, together with the ExAR and DL in this matter. This section of the judgement underscores the long‑standing position that challenges of this kind must be brought strictly on points of law; any indirect attempt to attack the policy itself will fail. What was the background? Dr Boswell sought judicial review of the decision of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
PI and Clinical Negligence Update: key case law (psychiatric injury, Animals Act, anonymity), QOCS and costs; MoJ CFO rate cut; CPRC minutes; NHS Resolution–CQC MoU; new regulations

In this issue: Key PI and Clinical negligence developments Civil procedure rule committee minutes Psychiatric and occupational stress Injuries caused by animals Claims involving a child Claims involving a fatality Costs and funding Other PI and Clinical negligence news LexTalk® PI & Clinical Negligence: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts LexisNexis® Webinars Useful information Key PI and Clinical negligence developments MoJ announces reduction in CFO’s interest rates The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed reduced interest rates for the Courts Funds Office (CFO) special and basic accounts. The special account rate moves from 4.75% to 4.50%, while the basic account rate shifts from 3.56% to 3.38%. Effective from 3 March 2025, the revision follows the Bank of England’s base rate cut on 6 February 2025 and is intended to ensure the CFO Service can continue to cover operational costs. See: LNB News 04/03/2025 38...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Standing Orders

PRACTICE NOTES
Appointment and dismissal of local authority statutory officers: standing orders, decision-making roles, JNC/Green Book terms and pay policy statements (England and Wales)

This Practice Note addresses the supplementary employment obligations specific to local government regarding the recruitment and removal of statutory post-holders, including the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) for Local Authority Chief Officers terms, green book provisions, occupation-specific conditions of service, and authorities’ rules on employment procedures. It sets out the varying rules that apply to different categories of officers. It further outlines the part played by leaders or elected mayors and the cabinet under executive arrangements, together with the Chief Executive, in these processes as applicable. Discussion of employment issues in local government fall into three areas: routine employment law issues, such as those concerning discrimination, fair or unfair dismissal (including redundancy), TUPE, etc contractual obligations, which necessitate consultation with national conditions of service except where local agreements have been made ...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Statutory planning challenges to decisions, orders and plans in England and Wales: scope, grounds, standing, strict time limits, remedies and Planning Court procedure

Introduction Planning decisions and actions by local planning authorities (LPAs), the Secretary of State and other public bodies can be contested in the courts where the decision was unlawful. Most planning decisions are capable of challenge by a High Court application for judicial review (see Practice Note: Planning judicial review). However, certain statutory schemes governing particular decisions or acts expressly preclude court challenges, including judicial review, save through a statutory application. Put simply, the legislation states that a decision or action may only be questioned under a specified statutory route. Such proceedings are termed statutory reviews or statutory challenges. This Practice Note concentrates on the arrangements for applications for statutory planning review (usually called ‘applications’ rather than ‘claims’, though the labels are used interchangeably), which, in the planning context, comprise: applications under section 287 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) concerning the validity of simplified planning zone schemes and certain highway and other orders applications under TCPA 1990, s 288...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Scottish judicial review procedure: raising and progressing petitions—standing, three-month limit, permission, intimation and service, oral hearings and appeals, urgent applications, transfers and public interest interventions

Civil justice reform Refer to our Practice Note, Civil justice reform in Scotland—virtual hearings and electronic submission of documents, for up-to-date rules and practice in Scotland’s civil courts on remote hearings and the electronic signing, transmission and lodging of documents. The Note also sets out the process for commencing a judicial review in Scotland. For guidance on: further aspects of judicial review in Scotland, see Practice Notes: Judicial review in Scotland; Judicial review in Scotland—grounds of challenge; Judicial review in Scotland—remedies; and Judicial review in Scotland—protective expenses orders other key areas of Scots law and procedure, consult our Scotland collection judicial review in England and Wales, see Practice Notes: Judicial review—what it is and when it can be used; and Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocol Key CR(S)A 2014: Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 CSA 1988: Court of Session Act 1988 RCS: Rules of the Court of Session 1994 Legal framework for...

Read More Right Arrow