Statement of truth meaning

This Checklist This Checklist sets out the practical details to be gathered before making an application for a grant of letters of administration (with Will annexed). It applies to all instances of proving a Will where the applicant is not the executor. For guidance on when this route is appropriate, see Practice Notes: Letters of Administration with Will annexed Administration with Will annexed—priority to apply for grant—Q&As You must review the Will and ensure the statement of truth in the application form PA1P or the online application is accurately completed. The Will Confirm the original Will is available and that it was executed in the testator’s full name. If the name appearing in the Will differs from the testator’s official name, the explanation must be included in the application’s statement of truth (arising from the application form PA1P or the online application). See Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987), SI 1987/2024, r 9...

In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Contamination and pollution Energy efficiency and buildings Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental information Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR)-UK government publishes Business Model documentation On 27 August 2025, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) released a suite of papers on its proposed Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR) Business Model and accompanying policy. The Lexis+ Energy team, working with Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Senior Lecturer in Climate Law at the University of Edinburgh Law School, set out the context for the GGR Business Model; its relationship with the Power BECCS Business Model; the technologies the GGR framework intends to encompass; its legal footing and principal features; and how...

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Cost and funding Case management Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments Court information HMCTS updates Form N215 certificate of service HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has issued a revised English Form N215 Certificate of Service for civil proceedings, which also brings in a new statement of truth. While the layout has been updated, the details required remain unchanged, with extra notes added to assist with completing the form. For further detail, see: HMCTS updates Form N215 certificate of service—LNB News 27/01/2026 36. Additional permanent courtrooms to boost capacity The government will make four former Nightingale Courts in Fleetwood, Telford, Chichester and Cirencester permanent, creating 11 additional courtrooms across England and Wales to increase capacity for criminal, family and civil work and help cut delays. For further detail, see:...

Vardy v Rooney and another [2022] EWHC 2017 (QB) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision will attract attention as a concrete application of the truth defence, and for Steyn J’s conclusion that the public interest defence failed. It also clarifies the contours of the defences advanced in modern media litigation before the court. It further demonstrates the court’s readiness to make inferential findings of fact where: primary evidence is absent, or has been intentionally lost or destroyed journalists move to set aside witness summonses and disclosure orders by relying on source protection: see section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, and where waivers of source protection under that provision have been given (Mrs Vardy) or given and then withdrawn (Ms Watt) Mrs Vardy did not witness‑summon her ‘close friend and agent’, Ms Watt, who was by any measure a crucial witness; instead, she sought to use Ms Watt’s trial witness statement as hearsay there is a...

Note From 1 January 2026, the Commercial Court and the London Commercial Court are running a pilot under CPR PD 51ZH. By default, specified materials used in public hearings—such as witness statements and skeleton arguments—will be accessible to the public. Practitioners issuing applications in these courts should acquaint themselves with the pilot and take suitable measures to safeguard clients when drafting any impacted documents. For further direction, see Practice Note: Non-party access to court documents and information in civil proceedings. This Practice Note explains how to complete an application notice using form N244(CC) for proceedings in the Commercial Court. For broader guidance on applications, refer to the following Practice Notes: How to make an application for a court order (CPR 23) Making an application in the Commercial Courts Form N244(CC) In civil proceedings, applications are ordinarily made by application notice—see Practice Note: Informal applications for when the court may allow an application without one. In most courts, the standard application...

This Practice Note explains when permission is needed to bring contempt proceedings under CPR 81 (also known as ‘committal proceedings’), together with the manner and forum in which any application for permission should be made. It also considers the proper forum for contempt proceedings more broadly. Types of case requiring permission CPR 81.3(5) states that leave to pursue contempt is only necessary in two categories: interference with the due administration of justice, save in relation to ongoing High Court or County Court proceedings; and an allegation that a person knowingly made a false statement in any affidavit, affirmation or other document verified by a statement of truth, or in a disclosure statement For more information on these types of contempt, see: and False statements. CPR 81.3 specifies the court to which the permission application should be directed, where permission is required—see: Permission and forum. Permission and forum Contempt application concerning knowingly making a false statement, etc, relating to existing...

Practice Note This Practice Note sets out guidance on the formalities to address when preparing witness statements in civil proceedings, and also offers direction on statements of truth and managing difficult witnesses. You should also consult Practice Note: Witness statements—substantive content, which covers the substantive elements. This Practice Note explains how the relevant CPR provisions should be interpreted and applied. Depending on the court in which your case is being heard, you may need to take account of further requirements—see: Court specific guidance below. Where a witness statement is intended for use at trial in the Business and Property Courts and falls within CPR PD 57AC, refer for additional guidance to Practice Note: Trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts under CPR PD 57AC...

The purpose of a claim form A claim form is the document that initiates proceedings. It sets out key details for the case, including: the court reference number to appear on all later court documents; the parties involved in the proceedings; the relief sought or what is being claimed; particulars of the claim (including any claim for interest); and contact details for the claimant, usually the claimant’s solicitor. The procedural requirements on how and where to commence proceedings are in CPR Part 7. General guidance on what a claim form should contain is provided in the Practice Note: Claim form—the contents. This Precedent is accompanied by material containing suggested wording for claims concerning infringement of UK registered designs, UK unregistered designs and/or supplementary unregistered designs. The Precedent also highlights the specific issues to consider when completing a claim form for these proceedings. The attached N1 claim form is illustrative only...

[ insert date ] Dear [ insert client’s name ] I am enclosing your completed Form E. Please check it to make sure the particulars are accurate...

Add the proceedings heading, identifying the court and, where applicable, the division in which the claim is to be issued, with full names of all parties and their designations as Claimant or Defendant respectively. Within the tramlines, place the words ‘Schedule of Loss’...

Changes to CPR PD 22 took effect on 6 April 2020. The revisions modified the mandated wording for the statement of truth that authenticates documents to be deployed in civil proceedings. Nevertheless, under both the old and new versions the signatory must still confirm their belief that the 'contents' of the pertinent documents are true—or, under the updated formula, that the 'facts stated' in the relevant document are true...