Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Step in rights

Step in rights meaning

What does Step in rights mean?
In practice, step‑in rights allow a third party—most commonly a funder, purchaser, tenant or, at subcontract level, the employer—to take control of a contract to keep a project alive if the counterparty defaults (for example, insolvency, material breach, or failure to proceed regularly and diligently). They are a contractual mechanism rather than a statutory concept and are typically documented in collateral warranties, direct agreements or tripartite agreements (and, less commonly, by third‑party rights). Key features usually include: trigger events; notice and cure periods; restrictions on termination or suspension until the step‑in opportunity has been offered; the step‑in party’s option to remedy defaults, assume performance (temporarily or permanently), appoint a replacement contractor, or take a novation; and obligations to pay sums then properly due and accept liabilities from the step‑in date (but not typically historic breaches). Step‑in rights are standard in construction, project finance, PPP/PFI and development funding to protect security, preserve continuity and maintain asset value. Usage and drafting practice are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, though insolvency regimes and third‑party rights legislation differ. The expression is descriptive and not defined in legislation, with enforceability depending on the specific contract wording.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Step in rights

CHECKLISTS
UK B2B Services Agreements Negotiation Checklist: Customer, Supplier and Balanced Positions Across Key Clauses

Introduction This checklist sits alongside the more detailed Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements. It serves as a quick-look aide and concentrates on the principal, generic points that commonly surface across most forms of services agreement. It leaves out certain specialist matters addressed in Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements that tend to arise only in particular categories of services arrangements or those of greater complexity (eg acceptance testing, audit rights, TUPE, step-in rights, benchmarking and exit assistance). It sets out the customer’s and the supplier’s optimal stances for each topic, then offers a proposed middle-ground position (which is not intended to be comprehensive). For deeper analysis and explanation of each point, refer to Practice Note: Negotiation guide—services agreements. For balanced precedent contracts, which implement much of what is explored here and in the negotiation guide, see Precedents: Services agreement—one-off supply—balanced, Services agreement (ongoing supply)—balanced and Framework services agreement—single contract with call-off orders—balanced. This checklist is relevant only to business-to-business dealings in commercial practice...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Property purchase due diligence: post-completion review checklist for construction contracts, consultant appointments, collateral warranties, third-party rights, reports and guarantees (England and Wales)

This Checklist outlines the principal contractual points within a bundle of construction documents that a construction lawyer should review and report on for a prospective buyer of a property or development. It should be read alongside: Construction due diligence for property purchase-initial review of construction package-checklist. After reviewing the documents and raising enquiries, the purchaser’s construction lawyer will also need to produce a report on the construction documents, see Precedent: Report on construction documentation. The issues below proceed on the basis that construction at the relevant property has been completed. Accordingly, there is no need to scrutinise terms governing the running of the contract during the build, such as payment provisions; these are only relevant where a buyer is acquiring while works are ongoing and step-in rights are being offered. Building contracts Identity of contractor – Confirm the contractor continues to exist and carry out a financial check (for example via Dun & Bradstreet) to ensure it is financially sound. Date of contract –...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
On-market share buybacks by UK premium listed companies: step-by-step legal and regulatory checklist (pre-29 July 2024 regime)

STOP PRESS: A major, wide-ranging overhaul of the UK listing framework took effect on 29 July 2024, abolishing the premium and standard listing segments and introducing a unified category for equity shares of commercial companies. That commercial companies category is strongly disclosure-led and sits alongside other listing categories, including the shell companies, secondary listing and closed ended investment fund categories. A new UK Listing Rules sourcebook commenced to deliver these reforms, and the previous Listing Rules sourcebook was withdrawn at the same time. For more detail, see Practice Note: Reform of the UK listing regime—fundamentals for guidance. This Checklist represents the listing regime as it existed before 29 July 2024. A limited company may acquire its own shares if certain conditions set out in the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) are satisfied under that statute. This is commonly referred to as a share buyback or a purchase of own shares. In addition to the provisions of the CA 2006, further rules and guidelines are relevant to a listed company...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Step in rights

FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart: process to exercise step-in rights under a collateral warranty

The defined terms in the flowchart shall have the following meaning: Appointed Representative Regulations — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Appointed Representatives) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1217 Business Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) Order 2001, SI 2001/1177 Exemption Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Exemption) Order 2001, SI 2001/1201 Non-Exempt Activities Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Professions) (Non-Exempt Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/1227 PRA-regulated activities — denotes regulated activities designated as PRA‑regulated activities under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (PRA‑regulated Activities) Order 2013, SI 2013/556 RAO — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/544 UCITS qualifier — carries the meaning attributed to it in the Glossary of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook To determine whether an activity is regulated, follow the flowchart below. Click below to view or print...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Appropriate consent (DAML) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 335: SAR process flowchart and required actions for lawyers

This flowchart illustrates a possible step-in rights procedure that might appear within a collateral warranty. The specific terms of any step-in rights set out in the relevant collateral warranty should always be reviewed before seeking to exercise such rights in practice. To view or download in PDF format, please click the link below...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Step in rights

NEWS
ArbitrateAD: Abu Dhabi’s new arbitration centre and rules—ADGM default seat, consolidation/joinder, emergency and expedited procedures, award scrutiny, technology, and transitional regime

The team behind arbitrateAD The registry Kristin Campbell-Wilson has now taken up the role of executive director at the newly established Abu Dhabi International Arbitration Centre. Bringing more than twenty years’ international arbitration expertise, she most recently served at the SCC Arbitration Institute, first as deputy secretary general and subsequently as secretary general. Her selection clearly underscores arbitrateAD’s strong focus on streamlined case administration in practice. It likewise marks a positive step for gender balance within the sector. The court The arbitrateAD Court (the Court) exercises oversight of arbitrations conducted under the arbitrateAD Rules. Under the arbitrateAD Rules, the Court is charged with appointing arbitrators, deciding challenges to arbitrators, and scrutinising arbitral awards, among other duties and responsibilities. The Court comprises 15 leading international arbitration practitioners, with women accounting for nearly half. This varied bench has wide geographic reach, with members based across 11 jurisdictions. They include five figures from the Middle East region, four originating from the UAE, plus ten others spanning Africa, Europe, Asia...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK IP weekly update—4 April 2024: fair dealing three‑step test, UK–Australia artist resale royalties, NDA crime‑reporting reforms, and new guidance, precedents, webinars and trackers

In this issue: Copyright & associated rights Confidential Information LexTalk®IP: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Copyright & associated rights What is the current position of the three-step fair dealing test in Article 5(5) of the EU InfoSoc Directive and Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention under UK case law, in an individual dispute where any form of fair dealing is relied upon as a defence to infringement? This Q&A explores the standing of the three-step test for a lawful copyright exception under both Article 5(5) of the EU InfoSoc Directive and Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention, considering its application to exceptions pleaded case by case under UK authority. It surveys how UK courts have treated these tests historically, and reflects on the possible effects of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Higgs v Farmor’s School: England and Wales Court of Appeal says offence or speculative reputational harm insufficient; employers must justify disciplining off-duty online expression of protected beliefs

Higgs v Farmor’s School and (1) the Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England, (2) the Free Speech Union Ltd others as interveners), the Association of Christian Teachers, (4) Sex Matters, (5) the Equality and Human Rights Commission (as interveners) [2025] EWCA Civ 109 A school worker’s success is set to shape how employers and tribunals approach cases where staff spark outrage by airing an increasing range of legally protected views, commonly online. Justice Nicholas Underhill, writing for a unanimous panel, confirmed that employers carry the burden of proof to show any disciplinary step is “objectively justified”. Free speech supporters welcomed the judgment as a landmark in human rights law, granting employees broad room to use unrestrained and provocative language. Susan Kelly, partner at Winckworth Sherwood LLP, said it re‑emphasised the democratic importance of workers being able to say what they believe, “whether or not that belief is popular or mainstream”. Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, stated the ruling declares “loud and clear that...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Step in rights

PRACTICE NOTES
Employment DSARs under the UK GDPR and DPA 2018: DUAA 2025 changes, practical guidance, time limits, reasonable searches, exemptions, third‑party data and enforced subject access offences

Assimilated law Assimilated law describes retained EU law that continues to apply after the close of 2023. For more detail, see Practice Note: Assimilated law. This Practice Note offers guidance on the rights of data subjects in the employment setting. It reflects the UK GDPR framework, and statutory references are to Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018), unless stated otherwise. It also accounts for provisions of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025) in force as at 5 February 2026 (see Practice Note: Data (Use and Access) Act 2025—employment implications). Updated guidance from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is awaited. For an overview of key themes in the Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679, UK GDPR and DPA 2018, and for employment‑specific guidance, see: The UK GDPR and DPA 2018: key data protection issues for employment lawyers, and The UK GDPR and DPA 2018: lawful processing of personal...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Employee study or training requests: eligibility, procedure, grounds for refusal, right to be accompanied, appeals, protections and remedies (Great Britain)

Certain specified employees have the statutory right to make a request to undertake study or training This entitlement applies to employees working for organisations with 250 or more staff who meet the qualifying service requirement (see: Eligibility and qualifying period, below). Although the scheme was originally intended to be broadened to include smaller employers, the government deferred that step to allow further evaluation of the likely impact on small businesses, and there are currently no plans to proceed with any extension. The approach to counting the number of employees for these purposes is prescribed by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 (Commencement No 2 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2010 (Commencement No 2 Order 2010), SI 2010/303. For a pro-forma policy aligned with the statutory arrangements, see Precedent: Policy—time off work for study and training. Official guidance on this right can be found on the GOV.UK website. The legal position on study or training rights and obligations for young employees is distinct from that applicable...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Cryptoassets and UK tax: situs for CGT and IHT under common law, contrasting HMRC guidance, key cases on residence, and tokenised asset considerations

STOP PRESS: The Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 2 December 2025 and took effect that same day. Section 1 confirms that an item (including one that is digital or electronic in nature) is not disqualified from being the subject of personal property rights simply because it is neither a thing in possession nor a thing in action. This clarifies that digital holdings including cryptocurrency, non-fungible tokens and carbon credits can now be recognised as personal property. See LNB: 04/12/2025 2. STOP PRESS: Abolition of non-dom regime and introduction of residence-based IHT regime Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025), which obtained Royal Assent on 20 March 2025, enacts the abolition of the remittance basis of taxation and replaces it with a residence-based regime from 6 April 2025. FA 2025 also removes domicile as the primary determinant of liability to inheritance tax. Further measures include revising the rules for excluded property status, ending the protected settlements status of offshore trusts, and alterations to overseas workday...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Step in rights

PRECEDENTS
Schedule of Employer‑Favouring Amendments to JCT SBC/AQ 2016 (England): Building Safety Act/HRB, Dutyholder and CDM compliance; design liability; collateral warranties; insurance; payment; insolvency; adjudication (arbitration removed)

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract With Approximate Quantities 2016 published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: This Contract adopts JCT SBC/AQ 2016 with extensive modifications to reflect design responsibility, building safety and commercial controls. Recitals: Contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; confirms site due diligence and accepts full CDP design liability. Articles: Dutyholder Regulations added; Tender Price covers Principal Contractor duties; arbitration removed; Schedule of Amendments prevails; strict protection of Third Party Agreements. Definitions/governance: new and revised terms (Building Safety Regulator, HRB, Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design Sub‑contractors, Dutyholder Regulations); several deletions; English court jurisdiction. Design/materials/information: skill‑and‑care design and coordination; only new, compliant, non‑deleterious materials; golden thread storage; monthly programme reporting; site risks at Contractor’s risk. Procedures/controls: tighter instruction, testing, defects and as‑built duties; enhanced confidentiality and IP licences; HRB assistance; CDM/Dutyholder competency confirmations. Sub‑contracting/rights: prescribed sub‑contracts, insurances and delivery of collateral warranties/third‑party rights; limits on assignment. Payment/commercial: 28‑day final...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Contractor collateral warranty deed to funder, purchaser or tenant—contractor‑friendly form with optional step‑in rights, assignment limits and PI/copyright provisions (English law)

This Deed is entered into on the [ insert date ] day of [ insert month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name ] (Company Number [ insert number ]) whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the ‘Contractor’); [ and ] [ insert name ] (Company Number [ insert number ]) whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the ‘Beneficiary’, which expression shall include successors in title and any permitted assignee) [ ; and OR . ] [ [ insert name ] (Company Number [ insert number ]) whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the ‘Employer’). ] WHEREAS (A) [ [ insert name ] (Company Number [ insert number ]) whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the ‘Employer’) OR The Employer ] has entered into a building contract dated [ insert date ] with the Contractor (the ‘Building Contract’) for the [ design and ] construction of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Conditional agreement for lease—developer landlord delivering major works: planning/funding, building contract and warranties, access and practical completion, tenant works/variations, measurement and contributions (England and Wales)

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], whose registered office is at [ address ] [ together with an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Landlord); [ name of Tenant ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], with its registered office at [ address ] [ and an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Tenant); [ [ name of Guarantor ], [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) ], having its registered office at [ address ] [ and an address for service in England and Wales at [ address ] ] (the Guarantor) ]...

Read More Right Arrow