“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”
KaurMaxwellAccess all documents on Strategic investment
STOP PRESS: A major overhaul of the UK listing framework took effect on 29 July 2024, featuring the abolition of the premium and standard segments and the introduction of a single listing category for equity shares in commercial companies. The commercial companies category is strongly disclosure-led and sits beside other categories, including shell companies, secondary listing and closed ended investment fund categories. A new UK Listing Rules sourcebook commenced to deliver these reforms and the former Listing Rules sourcebook was withdrawn. For more information, see Practice Note: Reform of the UK listing regime—fundamentals. This fundamentals note describes the listing framework as it existed before 29 July 2024. The UK corporate reporting landscape has been influenced by Brexit. For further details see Brexit—accounts and reports. There have been certain amendments to the requirements of the Companies Act, the DTR and the Listing Rules for accounting periods starting on or after the close of the transitional period, although the impact is largely confined to definitions (eg the meaning of a regulated...
Introduction Environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns sit centre stage for governments, regulators, consumers, and the workforce alike today more than ever. Firms can no longer overlook the steadily rising impetus behind ESG and the push for fuller disclosure and transparency. Yet the agenda goes further still. In shaping, executing and communicating strategy, companies increasingly recognise ESG as fundamental to generating enduring value within their strategic thinking. ESG elements are demonstrating their material influence on financial outcomes and organisational resilience. Greater transparency is enabling more profitable investment, and improved disclosure is regarded as benefitting every stakeholder overall...
Digital markets CMA sets out how it will implement the 4Ps to support growth and investment under the new digital markets competition regime. The CMA has released guidance explaining its approach to meeting its four strategic objectives—pace, predictability, proportionality, and process (4Ps)—within the new digital markets competition regime created by the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA). The 4Ps are intended to bolster growth, encourage investment, and strengthen business confidence across the UK’s competition and consumer frameworks...
What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling has meaningful consequences for advisers working on intra‑EU investment disputes and on enforcement tactics. Strategic seat selection: The judgment confirms that choosing a seat outside the EU—most notably Singapore—can shield ECT arbitrations from intra‑EU objections grounded in Achmea and Komstroy. Although those CJEU authorities expose intra‑EU awards to challenge within the Union, they do not impugn the validity of such awards in jurisdictions beyond the EU framework. Seat selection is therefore a critical strategic choice from the outset of any intra‑EU investor‑State dispute. Enforcement planning: Award creditors should look to enforce in non‑EU courts that are not bound by EU law doctrines. The SICC’s firm rejection of the intra‑EU objection outlines a clear path to enforcement outside the EU, offering a practical alternative where courts in EU Member States may decline recognition and enforcement. Definition of ‘investment’: The court’s refusal to apply the Salini criteria where the treaty provides its own definition of ‘investment’...
In this issue: Commercial real estate finance Leasing property Property management Residential tenancies Statutory compliance Property in Wales Additional property updates this week LexTalk®Property: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Commercial real estate finance Deliberate and unauthorised deed alteration renders legal charge void In Boult v Together Personal Finance Ltd [2026] EWHC 809 (Ch), the Chancery Division overturned the County Court at Cardiff, finding that the rule in Pigot’s Case rendered a legal charge void. The appeal turned on whether a unilateral, material change to a deed made after execution—without the other party’s knowledge or consent—invalidates it under the 400‑year‑old Pigot principle. The respondent, Together Personal Finance Limited, had lent money to the appellant, Ms Myranna Boult, secured against her property, and later commenced possession proceedings. Ms Boult maintained that the charge had been amended in manuscript post‑execution to incorporate an additional property without her...
This Practice Note examines the Bank of England (BoE) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)’s supervisory expectations for banks and insurers in managing climate‑related financial risks, as articulated in supervisory statement SS3/19 (updated November 2024), alongside the related policy statement PS11/19. Background and introduction On 15 April 2019, the PRA issued PS11/19: Enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change, which summarised responses to consultation paper CP23/18 and included the final SS3/19 setting out the PRA’s expectations. The PRA observed that climate change, and society’s response to it, generate financial risks relevant to its objectives and, although such risks may fully emerge over longer horizons, they are already starting to be seen. SS3/19 set the expectation that firms take a strategic approach to climate‑related risk management, identifying present exposures and plausible future risks, and implementing suitable measures to mitigate them. A revised SS3/19, updated to reflect PS15/24—Review of Solvency II: Restatement of assimilated law, was published on 15 November 2024. The PRA’s...
Understanding the IP portfolio Effective stewardship of an IP portfolio is vital to protect and enhance the worth of a business’s intangible assets. A well-structured portfolio enables right holders to pinpoint and safeguard core assets, advance commercial aims, and limit legal and financial risk. This Practice Note offers practical guidance for UK right holders and their advisers on running an IP portfolio efficiently. It spans legal compliance (keeping rights valid, current and accurately recorded) and strategic management (aligning IP protection with business goals). What is an IP portfolio? An IP portfolio is the collective set of registered and unregistered IP rights an organisation owns, holds under licence or otherwise controls. It functions as both a legal architecture and a commercial asset base that can generate income, attract investment and deliver competitive advantage. Portfolio management involves systematically recording, protecting, monitoring and exploiting these rights to ensure they continue to create strategic value. Types of rights commonly included Patents: inventions, processes, chemical compositions. Protection method:...
What is operational resilience? This Practice Note outlines the key operational resilience requirements that apply to UK financial services firms. Operational resilience is the capacity of firms, and the financial sector, to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover from, and learn from operational disruption. It goes further than business continuity and disaster recovery and is a strategic priority for regulators around the world. Operational resilience-in-scope firms The summary below sets out the categories of firms within scope of the UK operational resilience regime and the applicable rules and guidance from the PRA, FCA and Bank of England. Banks, building societies, and PRA-designated (ie systemically important) investment firms: PRA/FCA/BoE joint paper: Building operational resilience: Impact tolerances for important business services PRA Policy Statement PS6/21: Operational resilience: Impact tolerances for important business services The Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (CRR firms) PRA Supervisory Statement SS1/21: Operational resilience: Impact tolerances for important business services PRA Statement...
Area SMART goals Activities and steps Resources needed Viability Accountable individual Due date Future investment Risk control Financial matters Personnel Client services IT Premises and facilities Miscellaneous...
1 Investing in the future (legal and commercial investments) To capitalise on our firm’s core strengths, deliver outstanding client service, and elevate brand recognition and value To allocate resource to the planned programme of activities so we continue to attract and retain top talent To dedicate [ x ]% of turnover to reinforcing our business platforms: operations, systems, risk management and environment 2 Governance/management To evaluate the management structure and processes, and develop options for consideration that streamline and strengthen the firm’s management To review and reshape the focus, timing and management of senior meetings to emphasise strategic planning, innovation and appraisal of prepared proposals To implement business planning for each legal service and operational area 3 Risk management To progress agreed actions that raise risk awareness across the firm, supported by an open-door policy and a no-blame culture To continue providing the infrastructure, systems, training and support to manage...