“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”
KaurMaxwellAccess all documents on Summary judgment
This Checklist sets out a structured route to follow when preparing to issue a summary judgment application. It is guided by the detailed material in the following Practice Notes and is intended to supplement, rather than substitute, that guidance: Summary judgment applications—what, who and when Summary judgment—general principles Summary judgment—making an application Determining whether summary judgment is the appropriate application to make Is summary judgment available in this type of proceedings? In some proceedings, summary judgment is restricted or not permitted—see Practice Note: Summary judgment applications—what, who and when. On what basis do you say the proposed respondent’s case lacks a real prospect of success? Keep this question foremost—if you cannot state the point with clarity, it may indicate summary judgment is not the proper course. See Practice Note: Summary judgment—general principles...
For general guidance on summary judgment and strike out, please consult: Summary judgment and strike out—overview. For targeted direction on answering an application for summary judgment or strike out, also see Practice Note: Strike out and summary judgment applications—how to respond. Amendments to CPR Part 24 and CPR PD 24—1 October 2023 Practitioners should be aware that the CPR provisions concerning summary judgment changed with effect from 1 October 2023. CPR Part 24 was replaced and CPR PD 24 was withdrawn. These revisions were designed to streamline the rules and therefore do not materially affect the substantive law or practice. The numbering and placement of certain provisions has altered. Consequently, authorities issued before the 1 October 2023 amendments may still refer to the former provisions and numbering. References in this Checklist are to the current wording of CPR Part 24 as now in force...
Step/action Time (days) Section/rule 1. Draft the statutory demand. Depending on the type of debt asserted, consult: (Form SD2) r 10.1 Statutory Demand under Section 268(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Debt for Liquidated Sum Payable Immediately (Formerly form 6.1) (Form SD3) r 10.1 Statutory Demand under Section 268(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Debt Payable at Future Date (Formerly form 6.3) (Form SD4) r 10.1 Statutory Demand under Section 268(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Debt for Liquidated Sum Payable Immediately Following a Judgment or Order of the Court (Formerly form 6.2) Day 1 Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, r 10.1; Section 268 of Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) 2. Arrange and complete service of the statutory demand on the debtor. Service should ordinarily be personal unless circumstances are exceptional. Day 2–10 IA 1986, s 268; IR 2016, SI 2016/1024, r 10.2; PDIP, para 12.7 3....
In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental disputes and proceedings Environmental permits and consents Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Waste producer responsibility regimes Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change DESNZ releases quarterly waste data reporting template for the UK ETS. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has issued a template for quarterly waste data submissions under the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS). It is designed for waste operators to use when sending quarterly data reports to their regulator during the voluntary monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) period. See: LNB News 19/02/2026 50. AFME responds to European Commission consultation on climate resilience legislative framework. The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) has provided...
In this issue Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Applications—general Evidence and disclosure Appeals New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments CPR Committee minutes Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—6 June 2025: The Civil Procedure Rule Committee met on 6 June 2025 in a hybrid session at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference. The minutes confirm a forthcoming CPR 51 pilot enabling non-parties to obtain court documents, arising from the Supreme Court ruling in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] UKSC 38. They also record approved amendments to the e‑working pilot, progressing towards a permanent electronic filing system as part of ongoing court modernisation. Further topics included summary assessment of costs, arbitration updates, disclosure, civil restraint orders, closed material procedures, judicial review reforms for infrastructure projects, whiplash reforms, digital services and other procedural...
In this issue: Banking and Finance case round-up Lending Security Debt capital markets Derivatives Regulation for derivatives lawyers Securitisation and structured products Restructuring Technology in banking & finance transactions Regulation for banking lawyers Scotland Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Useful information Banking and Finance case round-up Banking & Finance—November 2024 case round-up For a summary of the cases we flagged in Banking & Finance during October 2024, refer to News Analysis: Banking & Finance—November 2024 case round-up. Lending Re KRF Services (UK) Ltd [2024] EWHC 2978 (Ch) The judgment addressed a High Court application for an administration order, heard in that court, and centred on two key points of interest: (i) whether the sole director’s resolution to seek an administration order was effective; and (ii) the effect of the sanctions regime. On the first question, the court examined the company’s unamended Model...
CASE HUB ARCHIVED This archived case hub sets out the position as at the date of the decision on 16 September 2015 to close the investigation; it is no longer being maintained or updated. For further detail, please see the timeline, commentary and related cases. Case facts Outline CMA Article 101 TFEU/Chapter I inquiry into the hotel online booking sector. The matter was reopened following the CAT’s judgment in the Skyscanner v CMA case. Latest developments On 20 August 2020, the CMA provided an update on its project tracking pricing behaviour by online travel agents, following the lapse of the 2015 commitments by Booking.com and Expedia not to apply ‘wide’ parity clauses in online hotel booking agreements. In summary, after the formal commitments expired on 1 July 2020, both companies stated they would continue to operate in line with those commitments going forward. Both companies have also confirmed that their commitments remain in force in the UK. The CMA will carry on working closely...
Practice Note This Practice Note sets out the full procedural guidance for court applications to renew or end a business tenancy, covers interim rent applications, and addresses Professional Arbitration on Court Terms (PACT)...
Practice Note This Practice Note consists of two strands created to help dispute resolution practitioners remain up to date with developments in case law that affect their field, or which influence civil litigation procedure more generally: selected forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court are highlighted below; see Key forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court—2022 summaries of significant appeal decisions in England and Wales (ie rulings of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court and, where appropriate, certain judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Court of Justice of the European Union), and ECtHR, which we have covered; see: Key forthcoming appeal cases—2022 You can navigate this content using the table of contents in the left-hand margin. Alternatively, search this tracker using [CTRL]+[F]. This material is not intended to be a comprehensive register of every appeal or major decision relevant to dispute resolution practitioners. Key forthcoming appeals to the Supreme Court—2022 Tort and negligence ...
Claim No. [ enter claim number ]...
[DRAFT] SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT—pre-action settlement [WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND SUBJECT TO CONTRACT [ SUBJECT TO SIGNATURE BY PARTIES AND/OR SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL ] ][CONFIDENTIAL] This Agreement is entered into on the day of 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of party ], a company incorporated in England and Wales (company number [ insert company number ]), with its registered office at [ insert address ] (‘Party A’) [ and ] [ ; ] [ insert name of party ], a company incorporated in England and Wales (company number [ insert company number ]), with its registered office at [ insert address ] (‘Party B’). together, the ‘Parties’ Whereas [ Set out the context of the dispute; for instance, if it relates to a contract, identify the contract’s purpose and date, and provide a summary of the parties’ respective obligations, e.g., ‘Pursuant to [ insert type of agreement, e.g., a distribution agreement ] dated [ insert date...
Claim No. [ enter claim number ]...