“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”
KaurMaxwellAccess all documents on Surrogacy Arrangement
In this issue: Practice and procedure Financial provision Private children Public children International children LexTalk®Family: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Updated content New Q&As Useful information Practice and procedure President discusses transparency in the Family Court On 29 January 2024, Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, spoke about transparency in the family courts on Radio 4’s Today programme; listen here (from 1.07.50 onwards). HMCTS publishes blog on future of remote hearings HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has shared a blog, Looking at the future of remote hearings, which explores the Video Hearings Service (VHS) and the ways it has reshaped preparation for hearings. HMCTS highlights benefits including secure, private meeting rooms for judicial office holders to deliberate, and protected rooms for pre-hearing consultations and negotiations. HMCTS also states it intends to roll out the VHS across the country from Autumn 2024, and that it is...
Re Z (Unlawful Foreign Surrogacy—Adoption) [2025] EWHC 339 (Fam) What are the practical implications of this case? A stark warning to anyone contemplating unlawful, commercial surrogacy overseas, this judgment candidly exposes the legal hazards they are likely to encounter in practice. The children central to the proceedings met significant obstacles when attempting to return to the UK alongside their intended parents: persistent problems arose with the registration of their births abroad, and the consequence was that, for years, they remained stateless and with nobody able to exercise parental responsibility for either child. Their journey home was impeded, and bureaucratic hurdles around recognition of their births produced prolonged uncertainty. Throughout that period, no adult held lawful authority to make decisions on their behalf. In addition, the court questioned the wisdom of the applicants in proceeding with a surrogacy arrangement where one applicant was over 70 and her partner was rapidly approaching that age. The court observed that the endeavour appeared entirely self-serving and devoid of thought for the children’s long-term...
E v R and others [2023] EWFC 214 What are the practical implications of this case? The central message from this decision is that, although intended parents are not legally required to obtain a parental order, appreciating the particular composition of international families is crucial to pinpoint potential difficulties in other legal systems. Professional guidance should be taken overseas, ideally prior to conception and, in any event, before lodging any court application in this jurisdiction. Had the couple sought a parental order here without considering the knock-on effects for the child in Italy, the child might have faced serious, long-term consequences that could not easily be undone... What was the background? The matter concerned a gestational surrogacy arrangement in Argentina entered into by E and L, a male same-sex couple, with a surrogate who was a close family friend. E and L had been together since 2000 and formalised their relationship with a civil union in Argentina (their country of birth) on 8 December 2004...
A surrogacy arrangement describes a situation in which a woman carries a baby for another person, with the expectation that, at birth, the child will be passed to the commissioning couple or party and then brought up as their own. The principal provisions governing these arrangements are set out in the: Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 (SAA 1985) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008) Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010, SI 2010/985 (SI 2010/985), revoked by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2018, SI 2018/1412 (SI 2018/1412) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (Remedial) Order 2018, SI 2018/1413 (SI 2018/1413) It is an offence to carry out commercial surrogacy arrangements in the UK, see: The meaning of a surrogacy arrangement. Guidance The government has issued guidance for surrogates and intended parents explaining how to start a family through a surrogacy arrangement, and on how to care for surrogates and intended parents in England...
This Practice Note sets out the shared parental leave framework for births under section 75E of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) and the Shared Parental Leave Regulations 2014 (SPL Regs 2014), SI 2014/3050. In outline, after a child is born, the mother and one other person — either the child’s father, or an individual who is married to, the civil partner of, or the partner of, the mother — may share up to 50 of the 52 weeks of leave that would otherwise be the mother’s maternity leave. It does not add to the total leave available; instead, it enables those two people to divide that existing entitlement if they wish. Overview of shared parental leave and pay on birth In brief, eligible parents who share responsibility for a child can use shared parental leave in the first year after: the birth of their child adopting a child (refer to Practice Note: Shared parental leave (adoption)) obtaining a parental order following...
FORTHCOMING CHANGE: Under the Paternity Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (currently in draft) and the Statutory Paternity Pay (Amendment) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/121, the key updates, scheduled to take effect on 8 March 2024, are as follows: employed fathers and partners will (a) gain the option to split the existing entitlement of up to two weeks’ leave into two separate, non-consecutive one-week blocks; and (b) be permitted to take that leave at any point within the first year, rather than solely within the initial eight weeks following birth or placement for adoption. Further, for births, the notice period for intending to take leave will be reduced to just 28 days before the dates on which each period of leave (and pay, where eligible) is to be taken. For adoptions, the notice requirement will continue to be 7 days from the adopter being informed that they have been matched with a child. These amendments will apply in relation to babies expected to be born, placed for adoption, or entering Great Britain...