Tax arrangements meaning

This checklist highlights the principal tax considerations when handling distressed corporate debt, addressing in turn: acquisitions of non-performing loans debt restructurings (ie waivers, debt/equity swaps and renegotiations) enforcement of debts For fuller analysis of the points signposted here, see Practice Notes: Tax and distressed debt—acquisitions of non-performing loans Tax and distressed debt—debt restructurings Tax and distressed debt—enforcement actions available to creditors Acquisitions of non-performing loans This part summarises the tax considerations when a buyer takes on existing UK debt at a discount to face value: Where should the purchaser be located? will interest paid by the borrower to the purchaser be subject to withholding tax? if the purchaser is non-UK resident, can relief be obtained under a double tax treaty? to what extent will amounts received from borrowers be chargeable on the purchaser? How will the debt...

Double tax treaties (DTTs) have a dual nature. They function simultaneously as: international agreements between contracting states, and elements of a contracting state’s domestic law For a DTT to take effect, each contracting state must: sign and ratify the treaty, and incorporate the treaty’s provisions into its domestic legislation In some jurisdictions, a DTT is given automatic domestic effect as soon as it is signed and ratified. Elsewhere, including the UK, a further legislative step is required. In the UK, the arrangements set out in a DTT (and any amending protocol) are brought into domestic law as schedules to Orders in Council and are published as statutory instruments (SIs). After the DTT has taken effect in the domestic law of both the UK and its treaty partner, and any additional formalities or procedures required by the DTT (such as exchanging diplomatic notes) have been completed, the DTT will come into force. The treaty will...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 26 November 2025, within Budget 2025, the government confirmed that from April 2029, only the first £2,000 each tax year of a pension contribution made pursuant to a salary sacrifice arrangement will be free of National Insurance contributions (NICs). Any amount sacrificed by an employee above £2,000 a year will attract both employer and employee NICs, so the portion over £2,000 will, for NICs, be handled in line with standard employee workplace pension payments, meaning the excess is treated in the same way as other employee workplace pension contributions for NICs purposes. Employer contributions are unaffected, as is income tax relief. Employers will need to report the total amount of salary sacrificed through existing payroll software, with HMRC committing to engage with stakeholders. HMRC will publish further guidance ‘before April 2029’. The National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill 2026 will insert a new subsection into section 4 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 that empowers the government to make regulations providing for...

Mandatory Disclosure Rules (MDR) for Common Reporting Standard (CRS) Avoidance Arrangements and Offshore Structures In March 2018, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) issued the model Mandatory Disclosure Rules (MDR) for Common Reporting Standard (CRS) avoidance arrangements and offshore structures, intended to encourage country by country consistency in applying disclosure and transparency so as to combat aggressive tax planning on a global scale...

Before assessing whether certain aspects of the income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) regimes apply, and if an alternative tax treatment can be chosen, it is vital first to identify the existence of a restricted security in the first instance...

In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Criminal procedure and evidence Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Local authority prosecutions Money laundering International Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Refusal to repurpose evidence in civil proceedings for criminal charging decision (WFZ v British Broadcasting Corp) The High Court has recently clarified the circumstances in which a party will be permitted to rely on witness statements outside the proceedings in which they were first served. In ongoing injunction proceedings aimed at stopping publication of a BBC investigative report into sexual abuse allegations, the court determined that the accused could not use sensitive excerpts from that report in representations to the...

In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Food safety and hygiene offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences International Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Home Office issues guidance on Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act The Home Office has released guidance on the information-sharing measures in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023). It outlines provisions to help ensure businesses comply with the new measures, together with practical points for organisations, including arrangements for cross-sector sharing, obligations for law enforcement reporting, UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance, and customer redress. See: LNB News 04/10/2024 39. Criminal procedure and evidence...

Sword Services Ltd and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners What was this case about? The taxpayers brought a judicial review to contest payment notices (PPNs) issued by HMRC to members (ie partners) of several film production partnerships, seeking to have those notices quashed. PPNs are a form of accelerated payment notice (APN) given to partnership members. As with an APN, a PPN requires tax to be paid upfront while HMRC’s enquiries into the relevant arrangements are concluded. For more on the accelerated payments regime, see Practice Note: Accelerated payment notices. The taxpayers argued that the PPNs were unlawful on two bases: They were issued to members of a limited liability partnership (LLP), but schedule 32 to the FA 2014 (the PPN legislation) does not, in the taxpayers’ view, authorise HMRC to issue PPNs to LLP members; it applies only to other forms of partnership, such as general or limited partnerships. Condition A, one of the statutory requirements that must be met before...

Stop Press : From accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2026, the Diverted Profits Tax is superseded by the unassessed transfer pricing profits rules. This Practice Note, alongside Transactions in UK land—tax rules, examines the anti-avoidance provisions aimed at countering attempts to sidestep tax on income, profits or gains connected with arrangements concerning, or trades of dealing in, land. The main anti-avoidance measure seeks to treat gains of a capital character realised on the disposal of land as income, bringing them within income tax or corporation tax. Further detail appears in Practice Note: Transactions in UK land—tax rules. From 5 July 2016 these rules superseded and expanded the former transactions in land rules (for information on prior rules, see Practice Note: Real estate—anti-avoidance: disposals of land and taxing capital gains as income (pre 5 July 2016) [Archived])...

The enterprise investment scheme (EIS) It is primarily intended to boost investment in smaller, higher‑risk trading companies by granting a range of tax reliefs to individual investors who acquire newly issued shares in such companies. The EIS rules are prescriptive and contain numerous conditions that must be satisfied, including those relating to: the individual investors the issued shares the issuing company This Practice Note centres on the conditions that apply to the individual investor. Those conditions are outlined in the context of the income tax relief afforded by Part 5 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007). References to the equivalent capital gains tax (CGT) provisions are included where appropriate. For information on the remaining conditions, see the following Practice Notes: EIS—conditions for relief: issued shares, the funds raised and the arrangements in general EIS—conditions for relief: issuing company EIS—conditions for relief: qualifying trades For a summary of tax reliefs available...

The UK’s rules on hybrid and other mismatches Since 1 January 2017, the UK’s hybrid and other mismatch rules (described in this Practice Note as the hybrid rules) have been in force, designed to neutralise tax mismatches arising from how a hybrid instrument or hybrid entity is treated for tax. Although the hybrid rules typically apply to cross-border dealings involving two or more jurisdictions, they can also apply to transactions that are entirely UK domestic. They specifically address: deduction/non-inclusion mismatches (D/NI mismatches), i.e. where a payment under a hybrid mismatch arrangement is deductible in the payer jurisdiction for tax purposes but is not included in the taxable income of a payee or a related party investor; and double deduction cases (DD cases), i.e. where a payment under a hybrid mismatch arrangement gives rise to more than one tax deduction. For more detail on the hybrid rules, see Practice Note: Hybrid mismatches—introduction to the rules. For an overview in table form of...

Archived: The ability to offer tax-favoured employee shareholder shares or ESS (commonly used in private equity company arrangements) has now been removed In the Autumn Statement 2016, the government confirmed that certain ESS-related tax reliefs would be withdrawn. The changes remove: The income tax and NICs relief applying to the first £2,000 of employee shareholder shares an individual receives The capital gains tax exemption in respect of all, or a portion, of ESS shares The provision ensuring that, when a company purchases employee shareholder shares from an employee shareholder, the consideration is not treated as a distribution in the shareholder’s hands The withdrawal of these reliefs applies to any employer shareholder agreements entered into on or after 1 December 2016. However, an individual who had obtained independent advice about entering an employer shareholder agreement before 23 November 2016 could still complete the agreement before 1 December 2016 and retain the beneficial income and CGT tax advantages...

This Agreement is entered into on [ insert date of execution of the share option agreement ] Parties [ insert name of Company whose shares are being granted under option ] (Company) [ insert name of Option Holder ] (Option Holder) [ [ insert name of Grantor (if different from Company) ] (Grantor) ] BACKGROUND [ As at the date of this Agreement, the Company has agreed to grant the Option Holder an Option to acquire Shares on the terms set out in this Agreement and in line with the rules of the [ insert name of unapproved option plan ] (Rules). OR The Company and the Grantor intend that, as at the date of this Agreement, the Option Holder is to be granted an Option to acquire Shares on the terms stated in this Agreement and in accordance with the rules of the [ insert name of unapproved option plan ] (Rules). ] [ The Company...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: On 26 November 2025, within Budget 2025, the government confirmed that, from April 2029 onwards, only the initial £2,000 per year in total of any pension payment under a salary sacrifice scheme arrangement will escape National Insurance contributions (NICs). Amounts employees sacrifice beyond £2,000 annually will attract both employer and employee NICs, meaning any sum over that limit will, for NICs purposes, be handled in the same way as standard employee workplace pension payments. Employer pension contributions are unchanged, and income tax relief also remains intact. Businesses must record the aggregate salary given up using their existing payroll software systems, and HMRC has pledged to consult and engage stakeholders, as required. Further HMRC guidance will be published ‘before April 2029’...

IR35 The off-payroll IR35 framework applies where: from 6 April 2017, the engager is a public authority; and from 6 April 2020, a private sector organisation (other than one that is ‘small’) hires a worker via an intermediary, for example a personal service company (PSC). The legislation takes effect in respect of payments made on or after those dates, even where such payments relate to services delivered before those dates. This applies without regard to precisely when the work was performed. In essence, and in practical terms, the off-payroll IR35 rules move the task of deciding whether IR35 applies from the PSC to the end client in relevant cases and, where IR35 does apply, they place the duty to deduct income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) on the party nearest to the PSC in the contractual chain (whether that is the end client contracting directly with the PSC, or another intermediary within more complicated contractual structures). IR35 is engaged...

The appropriate section of the HMRC annual return to complete hinges on whether the relevant share appreciation right (SAR) or restricted stock unit (RSU) constitutes a securities option for the purposes of s 420(8) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. In both scenarios, the award counts as a securities option if it grants a legal entitlement to obtain shares, and this, in turn, is determined in practice by the precise terms of the award concerning the method by which settlement may actually occur...

This Q&A proceeds on the basis that intended lowering of the hurdle attached to the growth shares is not one element of a pre‑arranged sequence of steps or a tax avoidance arrangement (for instance, where the plan from the outset was to grant the shares with a high hurdle and later reduce that hurdle to confer a benefit on employees). In that scenario, HMRC might effectively contend that the employment‑related securities rules are not engaged, and that employees are instead taxable to general earnings, by reference to the cases of PA Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners and UBS AG v Revenue and Customs Commissioners...