Tender meaning

ARCHIVED: This archived checklist outlines the ways in which the 2016 iteration of the UK Corporate Governance Code varied from the 2014 UK Corporate Governance Code. It is not updated and is supplied for background purposes only. Checklist—2014 UKCG Code and 2016 UKCG Code compared In April 2016, the Financial Reporting Council issued a fresh edition of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the 2016 UKCG Code) to incorporate changes arising from Regulation (EU) 537/2014 (EU Audit Regulation), Directive 2014/56/EU (Statutory Audit Amending Directive) and the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 (Statutory Audit Services Order). The 2016 UKCG Code applied to companies with accounting periods starting on or after 17 June 2016. This table sets out how the 2016 UKCG Code diverged from the text issued in 2014 (the 2014 UKCG Code); differences are shown using italics (inserted wording) and square brackets (removals): Provision 2014 UKCG Code 2016 UKCG Code Preface Language specific to...

Request for Information (RFI) Before launching a formal tender for outsourced information technology services, organisations commonly seek essential details from prospective suppliers. This is usually achieved by circulating a Request for Information (RFI) to multiple providers. A company might deploy an RFI to clarify the solution it aims to procure, or as a market‑warming step to test supplier appetite for the engagement. More often, the RFI’s chief purpose is to shortlist suppliers, after which a fuller Request for Proposal (RFP) or an Invitation to Tender can be issued. An RFI should be crafted to draw out a set of standard data about the supplier, including its corporate make‑up and international footprint, together with details of the supplier’s experience and typical service catalogue. High‑level pricing indications can also be requested. The extent of detail sought will depend on both the complexity of the services to be outsourced and the company’s own clarity about what it expects from its outsourcing partner...

In this issue: Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Networks and network connections Renewable energy Capacity Market, balancing services and energy system flexibility International energy Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing DESNZ launches consultation on regulating TPIs in the retail energy market The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has opened a consultation to bring Third Party Intermediaries in the retail energy market under regulation, bolstering consumer protection and aiding the shift to a cleaner energy system. Triggered by cases of consumers and businesses being targeted by unregulated rogue brokers and other TPIs, this forms part of the government’s ongoing support for Ofgem to develop an effective market for non-domestic customers, alongside implementing recommendations from Ofgem’s July 2023 non-domestic policy consultation. The consultation closes on 15 November 2024. See: LNB News 20/09/2024 36. Ofgem launches statutory consultation on SoLR Levy Offset...

HMRC v Dolphin Drilling Ltd [2025] UKSC 24 Dolphin hired the Borgsten on charter from a related entity to act as a tender support vessel (TSV), delivering tender assisted drilling (TAD) operations to the Dunbar oil installation under a contract with the platform’s operator, Total. Beyond the TAD scope, and in addition to delivering those services, the Borgsten also served as living quarters for approximately sixty members of Total’s workforce engaged on Dunbar, alongside the company’s own crew based on the Borgsten. HMRC took the view that the hire restriction in section 356N of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 (CTA 2010) was in point; however, the company contended that the carve‑out in CTA 2010, s 356LA(3) applied, on the basis that it was reasonable to assume the Borgsten’s use for housing Total personnel was ‘unlikely to be more than incidental to...

Foreign Subsidies Regulation Commission launches in-depth investigation into the tender for the construction of Lisbon railway line under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation The Commission announced that it has initiated an in-depth investigation under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) concerning a tender for the construction of the Lisbon railway line accordingly...

STOP PRESS: From 24 February 2025, the core provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023) have taken effect. Any procurement launched on or after that date must proceed under PA 2023. Procurements started under the earlier frameworks—the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016, the Concession Regulations 2016, and the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011—must continue to be run and overseen in line with those rules. See Practice Note: Introduction to the Procurement Act 2023—PA 2023. This content relates to the Procurement Act 2023 regime. This practical guidance addresses public procurement under PA 2023. Under this regime, tender notices replace contract notices under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102. For practical guidance on contract notices under PCR 2015, see Practice Note: Prior information notices and contract notices. What is a tender notice? Under PA 2023, a tender notice is required to launch a competitive tendering process. PA 2023, s 21 sets out: when...

STOP PRESS: From 24 February 2025, the core provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023) now apply. Any procurement launched on or after that date must proceed under PA 2023, while procedures started under the earlier instruments—the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016, the Concession Regulations 2016, and the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011—must continue to be run and administered in line with those rules. See Practice Note: Introduction to the Procurement Act 2023—PA 2023. PCR 2015 as assimilated law PCR 2015 are EU-derived domestic legislation and therefore constitute assimilated law under sections 2 and 6 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. For practical guidance on the standing and interpretation of assimilated law, see Practice Note: Assimilated law. Public procurement reform The UK public procurement framework stems from EU public procurement law, and was consequently affected by the UK’s exit from the EU, albeit only to a limited degree. In substance, the UK regime continues largely...

What does this Practice Note cover? This Practice Note sets out an overview of liability management techniques for bonds—covering bond buybacks, tender offers, exchange offers and consent solicitation—placing particular emphasis on the process, the documentation to be prepared, and the principal legal and regulatory considerations that arise in delivering such transactions. The Note is directed mainly at investment‑grade bonds issued in the UK and European markets. For further information on liability management exercises, including liability management transactions involving loans/credit agreements, see Practice Note: FAQs on Liability Management Exercises. What is liability management in relation to bonds? Liability management describes a range of techniques used by issuers to actively manage or restructure their outstanding bond liabilities. Typical liability management transactions comprise: bond buyback tender offer exchange offer consent solicitation A liability management transaction can also be structured as a combination of these techniques...

This Agreement is entered into on [ date ] Parties [ Insert name of party ] [ of OR a company incorporated in England and Wales under number [ insert registered number ] with its registered office at ] [ insert address ] (Party 1); and [ Insert name of party ] [ of OR a company incorporated in England and Wales under number [ insert registered number ] with its registered office at ] [ insert address ] (Party 2), each of Party 1 and Party 2 being a party and, together, the parties. BACKGROUND Party 1 supplies [ insert description of goods and/or services ]. Party 2 supplies [ insert description of goods and/or services ]. The parties intend to submit a Bid as a joint tender to the Customer in answer to the Invitation to Tender. The parties seek to state their obligations and manage their rights concerning the Bid and, if the...

Definitions Partner(s) • refers to EITHER: [ the following: [ insert names of partners ] OR those [ insert type of group, eg councils or academies in a geographical area or a type of public body ], as described in the Find a Tender service (FTS) Notice. ] The expression Partner(s) shall be understood accordingly. Partner Contract • denotes any arrangement, whatever its form, between the Supplier and the Partner(s) that stems from this Agreement. 1 Use of Agreement by Partner(s) The Supplier accepts and agrees that the Buyer has entered into this Agreement for its own benefit and for the benefit of the Partner(s). Beyond supplying the [ Goods OR Services OR Works ] to the Buyer under this Agreement, the Supplier shall also supply such [ Goods OR Services OR Works ] to any Partner that makes a request, PROVIDED THAT doing so shall not disrupt, compromise, or diminish the level of service the Supplier provides to...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract With Approximate Quantities 2016 published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: This Contract adopts JCT SBC/AQ 2016 with extensive modifications to reflect design responsibility, building safety and commercial controls. Recitals: Contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; confirms site due diligence and accepts full CDP design liability. Articles: Dutyholder Regulations added; Tender Price covers Principal Contractor duties; arbitration removed; Schedule of Amendments prevails; strict protection of Third Party Agreements. Definitions/governance: new and revised terms (Building Safety Regulator, HRB, Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design Sub‑contractors, Dutyholder Regulations); several deletions; English court jurisdiction. Design/materials/information: skill‑and‑care design and coordination; only new, compliant, non‑deleterious materials; golden thread storage; monthly programme reporting; site risks at Contractor’s risk. Procedures/controls: tighter instruction, testing, defects and as‑built duties; enhanced confidentiality and IP licences; HRB assistance; CDM/Dutyholder competency confirmations. Sub‑contracting/rights: prescribed sub‑contracts, insurances and delivery of collateral warranties/third‑party rights; limits on assignment. Payment/commercial: 28‑day final...

A well-known problem amongst procurement professionals A widely recognised headache for procurement practitioners arises from the duty in regulation 53 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 53). It requires the ‘procurement documents’ to be accessible at the time a public contract is advertised in the Official Journal of the European Union (the Official Journal, or OJEU). In essence, contracting authorities must use the internet to provide unrestricted, complete and immediate access, at no cost, to those documents from the day a notice, issued under regulation 51, appears in the Official Journal, or from the day an invitation to confirm interest is dispatched. The issue most often raised, particularly for public procurements run under the restricted procedure (and comparable routes that involve a pre-qualification phase ahead of the award stage), is whether the invitation to tender and the specification must already be available when the contract notice is published in the OJEU. Timing this disclosure often proves challenging for contracting authorities...

Assumptions have been made that this is an above-threshold procurement, conducted via a fully compliant public purchasing process in line with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102, and that standstill notices were issued under PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 86, to the winning tenderer and all unsuccessful tenderers, across the procurement process. We further assume the original contractor stopped trading (without entering insolvency) at any stage. Consequently, we have not examined the safe harbours that allow for modifying or substituting a contractor under PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 72(1)(d) for this analysis. Where a public contract has collapsed because the supplier has stopped trading (with no sign of insolvency), and the contracting authority is contemplating appointing a replacement, several points require attention by decision-makers herein. A few illustrations are outlined below...

This Q&A concerns a contract for land and vehicles―a mixed contract. Not every land transaction must follow a public procurement process publicised in the Official Journal of the European Union. Whether such a procedure is needed depends on the character of the arrangement and the contracting authority’s involvement, though land can still comprise a procurable component within a contract. The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102, do not apply where a contract contains inseparable mixed elements and the procurable aspects are not the contract’s principal object. The key point here is to determine whether the dominant element is the vehicles or the land. Under PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 4(2), there are provisions guiding a contracting authority when dealing with a contract that includes some, but not exclusively, procurable elements...