Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Third party notice

Third party notice meaning

What does Third party notice mean?
In pensions regulation practice, a third party notice is a written request issued by The pensions regulator (TPR) to a person other than the scheme’s trustees, managers or employer, requiring specified information, documents, or attendance at interview to support an investigation. The label is descriptive rather than a statutory term, and typically refers to a notice given under the Pensions Act 2004 (for example, section 72 information-gathering powers). Key features include: a stated scope and deadline; the requirement that the material is reasonably required for TPR’s functions (such as anti-avoidance, scheme funding, governance or automatic enrolment compliance); preservation of legal professional privilege; and potential criminal and/or civil penalties for non‑compliance or for providing false or misleading information, subject to a reasonable excuse defence. Penalty decisions can generally be challenged, including by appeal to the First-tier Tribunal. Use and effect are broadly consistent across England & Wales and Scotland. Parallel provisions apply in Northern Ireland under equivalent pensions legislation, and TPR exercises its powers UK‑wide. In Ireland, the Pensions Authority has comparable statutory information powers under the Pensions Act 1990, but “third party notice” is not a formal Irish term.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Third party notice

CHECKLISTS
Online brand protection: checklist for trade mark registrations, compliance and licensing, monitoring (including AI), counterfeits, platform takedowns, evidence, and enforcement against sellers, marketplaces, ISPs, and via customs and social media.

This checklist sets out the main points to consider when shaping an online brand protection strategy. Use it alongside the Practice Note: Brand protection online—strategy. Protecting the brand Have you established the right safeguards? Have you secured suitable trade mark and other relevant registrations? Is there a global filing and enforcement plan to avoid issues in first-to-file countries? Are you tracking unauthorised activity? (see below for details) Have you set enforcement criteria to prioritise particular infringements? Are you ready to act swiftly through take-down procedures? Have you ensured official brand sites maintain a strong online presence? Are you leveraging technological advances to make authentic items harder to copy? Do you maintain good working relationships with customs and law enforcement agencies? Do third parties know the business will rigorously protect its brands? Do you have robust compliance measures in place? Do you publish a website IP notice that makes third parties aware...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Real estate finance: checklist for perfecting security—Companies House, HM Land Registry, unregistered land, notices and assignments (England and Wales)

This Checklist This Checklist explains the actions property solicitors must take to perfect security in a real estate finance transaction. Real estate finance lenders will typically seek a comprehensive security package over all assets connected with the real estate. A real estate solicitor within a multi-disciplinary team will commonly arrange or contribute to the following securities and documentation: security over the land, rental income, insurance proceeds, development and construction, and contractual rights reviewing the management agreement and negotiating a duty of care agreement (although in a multi-disciplinary team, this is sometimes handled by the banking and finance lawyer) dealing with completion undertakings and post-completion registration of the legal charge at Companies House and HM Land Registry, as well as giving third party notices regarding rent payment, notice of charge and, where necessary, assignment of contractual rights or warranties See Practice Notes: Security in real estate finance transactions, Taking security over land and Taking security over unregistered land and Taking and perfecting...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Asset purchase intellectual property licence: drafting checklist for long- and short-form agreements (scope, territory, fees, sub-licensing, warranties, termination and registrations)

How to use this Checklist Use this checklist to identify recurring points when preparing long- or short-form IPR licences in an asset purchase. Read with the Intellectual property licence (asset purchase) precedents (long/short). For assignments, see the corresponding precedents and checklist. For particular rights, consult the copyright, design, patent and trade mark precedents and checklists. See Practice Notes on licensing/sub-licensing IPRs, software licensing, know-how, and IP tax. May inform heads of terms; see Heads of terms—commercial contracts. Checklist for proposed licence of intellectual property rights (asset purchase) (A) Key commercial considerations Parties/relationship: status, authority, beneficiaries/guarantees, arm’s length, contingencies, documents. Timing: start date, term, notice, conditions precedent, early termination and effects. IPRs: types; scope (registered/unregistered, applications, renewals, improvements); exclusions/third-party IPRs; moral rights; ownership; exclusivity; transfer/sub-licensing; territory; use and purpose. Pricing: fees/royalties/expenses; ancillary costs and IPO registrations; VAT/taxes; price changes; invoicing/payment; escrow for critical software; formalities. (B) Other standard legal terms and conditions Liability and termination; warranties/indemnities...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Third party notice

NEWS
UK energy law weekly update: DESNZ and Ofgem consultations, CfD AR7 budgets, OFTO and network reforms, retail TPI regulation, non-domestic smart meters, ETS aviation, CMP444 rejection, key deadlines

In this issue: Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Networks and grid connections Renewable energy Capacity Market, balancing services and system flexibility Air emissions, efficiency and climate change International energy Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Energy resources on Lexis+® Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing DESNZ has opened a consultation to strengthen Energy Ombudsman (EO) powers. It will concentrate on complaints from domestic energy suppliers, small enterprise complaints against non-domestic suppliers, and heat network complaints. Electricity and gas networks and third-party intermediaries will instead be consulted on separately. The plans include shortening the escalation period for complaints from eight to four weeks, allowing automatic compensation where EO decisions are not put into effect promptly, and granting the EO a statutory designation. DESNZ has also stated that Ofgem will regulate third‑party intermediaries, including energy brokers and price comparison sites, which have previously operated...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Implied novation despite NOM and termination clauses; estoppel and unreasonable refusal of consent to assignment: Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd v MWWMMWM Ltd [2022] EWHC 1191 (Comm) (England and Wales)

Gama Aviation (UK) Ltd and Another v MWWMMWM Ltd [2022] EWHC 1191 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? Key takeaways for practitioners include: NOM clauses: A party’s contractual rights and duties can be altered not only by variation but also by novation or termination. Anyone aiming to prevent such informal changes should adopt wording that makes this intention explicitly clear. contractual rights to terminate: Even where a clause grants a unilateral right to terminate by written notice, this may not stop the contract being discharged by an informal novation; whether it does will turn on the clause’s wording and the surrounding context. on covenants: As only reasons that genuinely influenced a party’s mind can justify the reasonableness of a refusal of consent, a party withholding consent should record its reasons at the time. The decision also supports interpreting such qualifications as rendering the covenants conditional on the covenantee acting reasonably, with the effect that the covenantor will be entitled validly to carry...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Arbitration update: court tightens s72 AA 1996 challenges; tribunal may award costs on jurisdiction; SGA s49 clarified; Hong Kong SMS notice; TPF guidelines; FIFA database—18 September 2025

In this issue: Arbitration in England & Wales International arbitration Institutional and ad hoc arbitration Sector- and industry-specific arbitration Other arbitration and ADR-related news and developments Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Useful information Arbitration in England & Wales English court adopts a strict approach to challenges to arbitration awards under section 72 of the AA 1996 A&N Seaways and Projects v Allianz Bulk Carriers [2025] EWHC 2126 (Comm) concerns a ruling stemming from two applications linked to A&N Seaways and Projects PVT Limited’s (the ‘Claimant’ or ‘Charterer’) claim form against Allianz Bulk Carriers DMCC (the ‘Respondent’ or ‘Owners’), aiming to contest an award pursuant to section 72(2)(a) of the English Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) (the ‘Section 72 Challenge’). The applications comprised: (a) the Claimant’s bid for permission to amend its claim form to plead fresh particulars of fraud (the ‘Amendment Application’); and (b) the Respondent’s attempt to strike out the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Third party notice

PRACTICE NOTES
ARIAS (UK) Rules 2014: Notices of Arbitration, Commencement and Service, Time Periods, Responses and Arbitrator Appointments

This Practice Note outlines the steps for commencing an arbitration and replying to a notice of arbitration in line with the third edition of the ARIAS (UK) Rules, adopted in 2014 (the ARIAS Rules). Those Rules govern any ARIAS reference begun on or after 1 January 2014. ARIAS arbitrations started before 1 January 2014 are subject to the ARIAS Rules 1997 (click here for the second edition). For an introduction to ARIAS, see Practice Note: Arbitration under the ARIAS (UK) Rules 2014. For guidance on agreeing to adopt the ARIAS Rules for resolving disputes, see Practice Note: ARIAS (2014)—general procedure. Starting an arbitration Notice of Arbitration The party initiating the arbitration (the claimant) does this by serving the intended respondent with a written notice of arbitration (ARIAS, rule 4.1)...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales waste-related restriction notices and orders under the Environment Act 1995: powers, procedure, offences, appeals and costs (England and Wales)

Restriction notices Section 109A of the Environment Act 1995 (EA 1995) authorises the Environment Agency (EA) and Natural Resources Wales (NRW), in England and Wales, to issue a notice that restricts access to premises and the importation of waste into those premises for up to 72 hours, by serving a restriction notice, where there is a risk of serious pollution to the environment or serious harm to human health arising from the treatment, keeping, deposit or disposal of waste, and where issuing the notice is necessary to prevent that risk from continuing. For information on the EA’s other powers to investigate criminal offences, see Practice Note: Environment Agency—powers to investigate environmental crime. For information on NRW’s other powers to investigate criminal offences, see Practice Note: Natural Resources Wales—powers to investigate environmental crime. Restriction notices are available only for use by the EA and NRW. Before issuing a restriction notice, the EA or NRW must make reasonable efforts to inform the occupier and the owner of the premises that the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Perfection and priority of land security: Companies House, HM Land Registry and Land Charges—creation, registration and protection (England and Wales)

Scope of this note Once security has been properly constituted, it is effective as between the security provider and the secured party. It is not, however, automatically binding on third parties such as a liquidator or an administrator of the security provider. In many situations, additional steps must be taken to perfect the security. Perfection is the process by which security is made enforceable against certain third parties (though not necessarily all). The term is sometimes used more widely to cover measures that improve or safeguard a creditor’s position, eg by securing a legal interest or ensuring the priority of its security. For information on the third parties that may not be bound by security that has been perfected, see The difference between perfection and priority below...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Third party notice

PRECEDENTS
Precedent: Scots law long-form boilerplate for commercial agreements (definitions, dispute resolution, notices, force majeure, third-party rights, counterparts, governing law and jurisdiction)

1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 Within this Agreement: Affiliate – refers to any entity that, whether directly or indirectly, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under shared Control with, another entity; Business Day – means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or a bank or public holiday in Scotland; Control – signifies [ the beneficial ownership of more than 50% of a company’s issued share capital, or the lawful power to direct, or to cause the direction of, the company’s management OR has the meaning assigned in the Corporation Tax Act 2010, s 1124 ], and Controls and Controlled shall be construed accordingly; Dispute Notice – has the meaning set out in clause 2.2; Force Majeure – has the meaning set out in clause 6.1...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Database sale and IP rights assignment agreement with data migration and UK GDPR provisions (pro-assignor) - England and Wales

This Agreement is dated [ insert date ] Parties [ insert name ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ] whose registered office is at ] [ insert address ] (Assignor) [ insert name ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ] whose registered office is at ] [ insert address ] (Assignee) Each of the Assignor and the Assignee is a party; together they are the parties. Background The Assignor owns the copyright and database rights in the Database. The Assignee is [ insert description of the Assignee’s background/background to assignment or relevant transaction ]. The Assignor agrees to assign all such copyright and database rights and to migrate the contents of the Database to the Assignee, and the Assignee agrees to accept that assignment and to assist and co‑operate with...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Executive director service agreement (Scotland): comprehensive precedent with drafting options, covering remuneration, benefits, confidentiality, IP, garden leave, change of control, and post-termination restrictive covenants

This Agreement is executed on [ date ] Parties 1 [ Name of company ] , a company constituted in [ Scotland ] bearing registered number [ number ] with its registered office at [ address ] (the Company ); and 2 [ Name of employee ] , of [ address ] ( you )...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Third party notice

Q&As
After forfeiture: moving tenant goods to re-let—administration

Where a lease is silent, items left at the premises after expiry of the term remain owned by the tenant (or any other third-party owner). The landlord, as a result, becomes an involuntary bailee of those items. This can create difficulties for a landlord aiming to clear the space for re-letting or another purpose, and may involve additional expense. In particular, the landlord: cannot take or dispose of the items, and must act in a manner that is right and reasonable may face liability in conversion, or for wrongful interference with goods, if the items are sold, damaged or discarded These exposures can be managed by using the procedures in the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 (T(IG)A 1977), either by serving notice or asking the court for permission to sell the items. Serving notice is the route more often used in day-to-day practice in most cases overall...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Must employers or their solicitors send privacy notices to ex-employees or their solicitors when taking formal action?

To handle personal information in a lawful manner under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679, an employer must first identify a lawful basis before any personal data is processed. Among the lawful grounds listed in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, GDPR, is processing that is necessary for the purposes of legitimate interests pursued by the controller or a third party, unless those interests are outweighed by the data subject’s interests, rights or freedoms. The Information Commissioner’s GDPR guidance explains that, in relation to the legitimate interests condition, it is the most adaptable lawful basis for processing; however, data controllers should not presume it will invariably be the right choice. The GDPR guidance further notes that: The legitimate interests basis tends to be suitable where individuals would reasonably anticipate the use of their data and the privacy impact is minimal, or where there is a compelling rationale for the processing Data controllers relying on legitimate interests take on additional responsibility to consider and...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Option to purchase reversion in registrable lease: agreed notice or LR9.1?

The question refers to the Land Registration Act 2002 (the Act), which mandates registration for any lease exceeding seven years. Absent registration, s 7(1) states the lease ‘becomes void as regards the ... grant .. of a legal estate’, while s 7(2)(b) states that ‘the grant … takes effect as a contract made for valuable consideration to grant … the legal estate concerned.’ The result is that the interest subsists only in equity. Consequently, non-registration affects not only the mutual rights of the contracting parties, but also whether a third party will be bound. By contrast, an option does not require registration in order to operate between the parties. In effect, the legal title does not arise, but the arrangement survives as an equitable contractual right, binding the parties and potentially affecting third-party obligations...

Read More Right Arrow