Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Turnkey contract

Turnkey contract meaning

What does Turnkey contract mean?
A turnkey contract (often called an epc contract) is a construction procurement in which one contractor engineers, procures, constructs, tests and commissions a project and then hands over a facility that can be operated immediately—literally by turning the key. The term is descriptive rather than defined in legislation or case law, and its use is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Typical legal features include: single point of responsibility; lump‑sum, fixed‑time obligations; broad transfer of design, co‑ordination and interface risk to the contractor; performance guarantees proven by completion and commissioning tests; liquidated damages for delay and under‑performance; limited grounds for extension of time or additional payment; and obligations to deliver O&M manuals, training and warranties. Employer’s Requirements are commonly output‑ or performance‑based rather than prescriptive design. Turnkey/EPC contracting is widely used for large infrastructure, energy and process plant projects and is favoured in limited‑ or non‑recourse project finance because it offers price and schedule certainty and bankable risk allocation. Internationally, the most common standard form is the FIDIC Silver Book (Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects).
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Turnkey contract

NEWS
Adjudication enforcement: natural justice challenge fails; ‘same dispute’ requires same claim, not same facts—Wordsworth Construction Management v Inivos [2024] EWHC 617 (TCC)

Wordsworth Construction Management Ltd v Inivos Ltd t/a Health Spaces [2024] EWHC 617 (TCC) What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment is another on common issues raised in relation to adjudication enforcement, while the court’s analysis draws some notable distinctions in its reasoning. The threshold for a successful natural justice breach in adjudication remains exacting; even a potential mistake of law will not suffice where the adjudicator has addressed the pertinent issues (however briefly) and provided reasons in the decision. Regarding serial adjudications, the court also appears to have traced a delicate boundary between deciding an issue tied to the same facts and making a decision on the same claim in two adjudications, and practitioners may need to weigh this distinction carefully when interpreting/applying the Sudlows v Global Switch decision. What was the background? The dispute concerned two applications for summary enforcement of two adjudicators’ awards arising out of a construction management contract for a turnkey modular facility at Newham University Hospital in...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Turnkey contract

PRACTICE NOTES
FIDIC Red Book 2017 v NEC4 ECC: A practitioner’s guide to key differences in risk, administration, pricing, payment, delay/EoT, claims, termination and dispute resolution

This Practice Note sets out a comparison of headline aspects of the FIDIC 2017 and NEC4 suites, highlighting similarities and distinctions across their principal features. It specifically concentrates on the NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) and the FIDIC Red Book 2017 (Red Book), used primarily where the Contractor constructs to the Employer’s design in practice (although, where the scope includes any Contractor design, the Red Book accommodates this). For commentary on the 1999 edition of the FIDIC Red Book, see Practice Note: FIDIC 1999 and NEC4 contracts compared. Overall philosophy FIDIC FIDIC contracts are the leading international standard-form construction agreements. They are often described as ‘written by engineers, for engineers’. The suite is also recognised for balanced risk distribution, with liabilities generally allocated to the party best able to manage them (the EPC/Turnkey variant, widely referred to as the Silver Book, is something of an exception). As one would expect from documents devised by engineers, the Engineer has a central function in a number of the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
FIDIC 1999 Yellow v Silver Books: design-build/EPC comparison, project suitability, risk allocation, administration, price and payment, claims/DABs, testing and third-party property damage

This Practice Note reviews the Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design Build 1999 (widely known as the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999) and the Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects 1999 (the FIDIC Silver Book 1999). Both are intended for scenarios where the Contractor, rather than the Employer, undertakes the design of the Works, but there are important differences, which are outlined in this Practice Note and considered at a high level. For deeper analysis of each form, see Practice Notes: FIDIC contracts—introduction to the Yellow Book 1999 and FIDIC contracts—introduction to the Silver Book 1999 for background and context. New editions of the Yellow and Silver Books were issued in December 2017. For more information, refer to Practice Note: FIDIC contracts 2017—what’s changed? [Archived]. These materials provide helpful orientation too. What types of projects are the contracts suitable for? Although both contracts envisage the Contractor being responsible for carrying out all, or the vast majority, of the design, and both are fixed price 'lump sum' contracts, that...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Comparative guide to FIDIC Red Book 1999 and NEC4 ECC: risk allocation, administration, pricing, payment, time and cost claims, termination and dispute resolution

This Practice Note sets out to compare and contrast the principal features of the FIDIC 1999 suite and the NEC4 suite. Its focus is the NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) and the FIDIC Red Book 1999 (Red Book), used where the Contractor delivers works to the Employer’s design. For commentary on the 2017 Red Book, see Practice Note: FIDIC 2017 and NEC4 contracts compared. Overall philosophy FIDIC The FIDIC suite is widely regarded as the foremost international standard form for construction procurement, most frequently characterised as ‘written by engineers, for engineers’. It is also widely associated with a carefully balanced approach to risk, allocating exposures to the party best positioned to carry them (the EPC/Turnkey option, commonly called the Silver Book, is something of an exception). True to its engineering heritage, the Engineer has a central role under, in practice, a number of FIDIC forms, notably the Red Book. For a general overview and background, see Practice Note: FIDIC contracts—introduction. For a more detailed introduction to...

Read More Right Arrow