Unconditional date (Code definition) meaning

STOP PRESS The Loan Market Association (LMA) has released refreshed editions of the standard terms and conditions for Par and Distressed Trade Transactions, the complete set of Funded Participation and Risk Participation Agreements, and the Secondary Debt Trading Documentation User Guide, with effect from 17 March 2026. The changes remove LIBOR references, update IBOR rate definitions and the Target2 definition, and revise ERISA representations to incorporate additional exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules under ERISA and the US Internal Revenue Code. The revised documentation is available exclusively to LMA members, accessible via the LMA’s Documentation Hub. These publications are updated versions issued by the LMA. Summary A core principle of trading under the LMA protocol is that ‘Trade is a Trade’; i.e. once a trade is struck—including an oral contract agreed by telephone—it is binding, and subsequent developments, even if adverse to one or both parties, do not entitle either party to cancel or ‘break’ the trade. By way of example, a failure to secure consent for...

STOP PRESS: The Loan Market Association (LMA) has issued refreshed versions of the standard terms and conditions for Par and Distressed Trade Transactions, the complete suite of Funded Participation and Risk Participation Agreements, and the Secondary Debt Trading Documentation User Guide, all coming into force on 17 March 2026. Changes comprise the deletion of LIBOR references, updates to IBOR rate definitions and the Target2 definition, plus revised ERISA representations that fold in further exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules under ERISA and the US Internal Revenue Code. The new materials are accessible solely to LMA members via the LMA’s Documentation Hub. Summary A core principle of trading under the LMA protocol is that ‘a Trade is a Trade’: once a trade is concluded (which may include an oral agreement reached by telephone), it is binding, and later events that may disadvantage one or both parties do not permit either side to rescind or ‘break’ it. For instance, not securing consent for an assignment or novation of the...

In this issue: EU fundamentals Commercial Data protection and cybersecurity Free movement, immigration and employment Financial services Energy Environment IP Life sciences Regulatory TMT Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers EU fundamentals European Commission releases March 2024 infringements package The European Commission has unveiled its March 2024 infringements package, highlighting EU Member States it is pursuing for breaches of EU law. It is sending letters of formal notice, issuing reasoned opinions and making referrals to the Court of Justice against Member States including Germany, Spain, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Slovenia, Ireland, Greece, Italy, Hungary, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Poland, Netherlands and Croatia, for infringements spanning the environment, internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), migration, home affairs and security union, justice, energy and climate, and mobility and transport. See: LNB News 13/03/2024 51. Council of the EU allows EU to...

On 18 July 2025, the Commission issued administrative guidance on the EU AI Act’s rules for GPAI models, designed to clarify scope, core concepts and how these interact with a related code of practice. The guidance sets out key legal terms to map the reach of the EU AI Act’s global partnership and artificial intelligence (GPAI) regime and pinpoint which businesses must comply. An initial draft was released in April 2025 to gather views from stakeholders. Following that consultation, the Commission’s AI Office outlined the principal revisions to EU Member States at a European AI Board meeting in late June 2025. The GPAI provisions will apply from 2 August 2025... Definition of GPAI models The guidance introduces a quantitative test to determine whether a model qualifies as a GPAI model—and is therefore within the AI Act’s remit—based on the computing power used for training. The benchmark, set in the early draft at 10²² floating-point operations per second, or FLOPs, has been increased to 10²³ FLOPs, aligning with the...

In this issue: New technologies Data protection Media Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Telecommunications LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information New technologies European Commission issues guidelines on the definition of AI systems The European Commission has released long‑anticipated, detailed guidance on the definition of artificial intelligence (AI) systems set by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act). This practical guidance is designed to help providers, deployers, importers and distributors judge whether a system qualifies as an AI system under the EU AI Act, supporting consistent application and enforcement. The definition of AI systems has applied since 2 February 2025. Dóra Petrányi, Central Eastern Europe managing director and co‑head of the Technology, Media and Communications Group, together with CMS partners Katalin Horváth and Ian Stevens, explore the central features of the definition. See News Analysis: European Commission issues guidelines on the...

CASE HUB ARCHIVED –this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 4 September 2012; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline. Case facts Outline of the UK merger investigation into the completed and finalised purchase by DCC Energy Limited of certain selected oil distribution operations from Rontec Investments LLP, previously owned by Total UK Limited. Latest developments The CC determined the deal posed no competition issues whatsoever and did not lead to a substantial reduction in rivalry. Therefore, the CC approved the transaction unconditionally. Parties Acquirer—DCC Energy Limited (DCCE)...

Film and TV glossary A–B Film and TV glossary E–H Film and TV glossary I–L Film and TV glossary M–P Film and TV glossary R–S Film and TV glossary T–W CAP Code for non-broadcast media The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (the CAP Code) serves as the principal framework governing non-broadcast adverts, promotional sales activity and direct marketing messages. It is drafted by the Committee on Advertising Practice (CAP), a self-regulatory body whose membership comprises organisations representing advertising, sales promotion, direct marketing and media industries. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) polices the CAP Code and may require the withdrawal or amendment of any advertisement that contravenes these standards. Refer to Practice Note: Advertising law and regulation. Channel 4 Channel 4 operates as a ‘publisher-broadcaster’: it produces no programmes internally, commissioning content from production companies across the UK. Cinematograph film Under the Copyright Act 1956 (CA 1956), films gained protection as...

CASE HUB ARCHIVED This archived case hub sets out the status as at the decision date of 9 May 2023; it is not being updated. See further, timeline. Case facts Outline of the UK merger investigation into the anticipated acquisition by Viasat, Inc. of Inmarsat Group Holdings Limited. The deal features horizontal overlaps in the supply of in-flight connectivity for aircraft. Latest developments On 9 May 2023, the CMA published its final report, granting unconditional approval. It found that although the firms are close competitors (notably in supplying wi-fi connectivity on board flights), the deal would not lessen competition for services on flights used by UK customers because: (i) the satellite industry is growing quickly and changing in response to rising demand for satellite connectivity, largely fuelled by ever-increasing internet use by businesses and consumers; and (ii) the merged firm would face cumulative constraints from other competitors, including several new operators entering or intending to enter the market and established players that are also investing...

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-seller—individual sellers—unconditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity • any conduct subject to sanctions set by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctioning Body • the UK, USA, EU and any other relevant authority imposing/administering sanctions; Sanctioned Entity • any person or entity that is, or is owned/controlled (directly or indirectly, per Sanctions Laws) by, a party sanctioned or listed by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctions Laws • all applicable law on Sanctioned Activities binding any Party or this Agreement’s performance; Sanctions Policy • the Sellers’ sanctions policy in Appendix [ insert Appendix number ], as updated and notified to the Buyer; 1.2 The Sellers and the Group Companies, as at the date of this Agreement and throughout its term: are not Sanctioned Entities; have not been notified of any investigation into a Sanctioned Activity; are unaware of Business circumstances that could give rise...

APPENDIX [ 1 ]—Conditions and further terms of the Offer Part A 1 Conditions The Offer is subject to the following conditions: 1.1 Acceptance condition receipt of valid acceptances (and such acceptances not being validly withdrawn in accordance with the rules and requirements of the Code and the terms of the Offer) by no later than 1.00 pm (London time) on the Unconditional Date (or at such other time(s) and/or date(s) as [ Offeror ] may, subject to the rules of the Code or with the consent of the Panel, determine) in respect of Shares which, together with all other Shares acquired by [ Offeror ] (whether pursuant to the Offer or otherwise), carry not less than [ 90 ] per cent. (or such lower percentage as [ Offeror ] may decide) of the nominal value of the Shares to which the Offer relates and of the voting rights attached to those Shares, provided that (a) this Condition shall not be met unless [ Offeror...

[ To be printed on the headed paper of the lender ] [ insert date ] To: [ insert name and address of borrower ] [ and ] [ insert name and address of guarantor, if applicable ] Dear [ insert full name of borrower and, if applicable, full name of guarantor ] We make reference to the facility agreement dated [ insert date of facility agreement ] between [ insert name of borrower ] (the Borrower) and [ insert name of lender ] (the Lender), as varied, novated, supplemented, restated or substituted from time to time in accordance with its provisions (the Facility Agreement). [ We further refer to the guarantee dated [ insert date of guarantee ] between [ insert name of guarantor ] (the Guarantor) and the Lender, as varied, novated, supplemented, restated or substituted from time to time in accordance with its provisions (the Guarantee). ] ...