Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Virgos-Schmit report

Virgos-Schmit report meaning

What does Virgos-Schmit report mean?
A widely cited explanatory report by Professors Virgós and Schmit used by practitioners and courts to interpret the EU cross‑border insolvency regime, especially the concepts of centre of main interests (COMI), establishment, main and secondary proceedings, jurisdiction and recognition. It was written for the 1995 EU Convention on Insolvency Proceedings (which never entered into force) and is treated as travaux préparatoires for the original EU Insolvency Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000) and, where the same concepts persist, the Recast Insolvency Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2015/848). The report is not legislation but a persuasive interpretative aid. It was expressly endorsed in the opinion of advocate general Jacobs and taken into account in Eurofood IFSC (CJEU, C‑341/04), and approved as a guide by the Court of appeal in Re Stanford International Bank Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 853. Jurisdictional use: - Ireland: remains a standard reference when applying the Recast Insolvency Regulation. - England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: the EU Insolvency Regulation no longer applies to new cases post‑Brexit, but the report is still cited in legacy matters under saving provisions and by analogy when addressing COMI and related issues under the Cross‑Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (Model Law) and at common law.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Virgos-Schmit report

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK insolvency exception under the Lugano and Hague Conventions: jurisdictional scope, dovetailing with EU regimes, and key post‑Brexit case law

The conventions/regulations The insolvency exception features in a number of conventions/regulations, including: Lugano Convention: the convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Denmark, signed on behalf of the European Community on 30 October 2007 (the Lugano Convention), which governs disputes involving Switzerland, Norway or Iceland. Although the UK applied to join in its own right post-Brexit, the EU declined that accession. The Lugano Convention remains operative among its contracting parties. For more detail, see Practice Notes: Tracker-Lugano Convention 2007 [Archived] and Lugano Convention 2007-general provisions in relation to jurisdiction. Hague Convention: the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (the Hague Convention), in force from 1 October 2015 onwards. Historically, the UK participated by virtue of EU membership. On 28 September 2020, the UK deposited its instrument of accession to the Hague Convention on Choice of Court...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Understanding the insolvency exception under Lugano and the Hague Choice of Court Convention: scope, interplay with the EU Insolvency Regulation and Brussels I (recast), and leading CJEU decisions

The conventions/regulations The insolvency exception appears in a range of conventions/regulations, including: Lugano Convention — the convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Denmark, signed on behalf of the European Community on 30 October 2007 (the Lugano Convention), which governs disputes involving Switzerland, Norway or Iceland. For further information on this convention, see Practice Notes: Tracker—Lugano Convention 2007 [Archived] and Lugano Convention 2007—general provisions in relation to jurisdiction Hague Convention — the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (the Hague Convention) (in force from 1 October 2015 onwards) The insolvency exception In cross-border insolvencies, deciding which court has jurisdiction often depends on identifying the governing cross-border convention or regulation and whether the various instruments are intended to dovetail, or whether some matters fall between two stools. Many cross-border conventions/regulations expressly carve out...

Read More Right Arrow