Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Warranty

Warranty meaning

/ˈwɒr(ə)nti/
What does Warranty mean?
A warranty is a contractual promise that specified facts are true or that goods or services will meet stated standards. Lawyers use warranties to allocate risk and support due diligence, commonly in sale of goods, supply, real estate and M&A/share purchase agreements. In sale of goods law, “warranty” is defined by statute: Sale of Goods Act 1979 (England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and the Sale of Goods Act 1893 as amended by the 1980 Act (Ireland) treat a warranty as a stipulation collateral to the contract’s main purpose. Breach of warranty gives a right to damages but not to terminate the contract or reject the goods. Across UK and Irish contract law more broadly, courts respect the parties’ classification (warranty vs condition) but will construe the contract as a whole (e.g. Schuler v Wickman); some terms are innominate, with remedies depending on seriousness (Hong Kong Fir). A breach labelled as a “warranty” will usually yield damages only, unless the breach separately amounts to repudiation. In consumer contexts, “warranty” is often used for a voluntary manufacturer’s or seller’s guarantee; this is regulated as a commercial guarantee (UK Consumer Rights Act 2015; Ireland Consumer Rights Act 2022). In Scots property law, the...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Warranty

CHECKLISTS
Breach of warranty claims under SPAs (and APAs): claimant pre-action checklist and key procedural steps and deadlines (England and Wales)

This Checklist sets out the key points to consider when advising a prospective claimant on a potential breach of warranty claim arising from a share purchase agreement (SPA). The same broad approach will apply to an asset purchase agreement (APA). For additional guidance on breach of warranty claims, see the related content links on the right-hand side. Read this Checklist together with Practice Note: Starting an SPA breach of warranty claim—a practical guide... Action Comments Review the SPA Check the: governing/choice of law provisions — is the agreement governed by English law? jurisdiction provisions — do the English courts have jurisdiction? warranty provisions and warranty limitation provisions — does the issue fall within the warranties and are you within the time limit to bring a breach of warranty claim? Note all deadlines in the agreement that could be relevant to any potential warranty claim... Review the disclosure letter Confirm that the issue has not been disclosed against...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Assignment of building contracts, consultant appointments and collateral warranties: restrictions, consent, legal assignment, notices and when to novate—practitioner checklist (England and Wales)

This Checklist offers a proposed set of key points to weigh up when assessing whether a construction agreement—be that a building contract, a consultant appointment or a collateral warranty—can be assigned. It also sets out the practical steps to be taken to complete an assignment of the benefit of a construction contract from one party to another. Does the construction contract contain assignment provisions? Construction agreements commonly include an explicit clause addressing the parties’ rights to assign under it. Where the contract says nothing about assignment, either side may assign the contract without limitation or constraint. In some cases, the contract will expressly bar assignment by one or both parties. Usually, the employer is not wholly barred from assigning; however, there is often a cap on how many assignments can occur without the other party’s consent (see further on restrictions below). See Practice Note: Assignment in construction contracts. Are there any restrictions on the right to assign? Construction...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Equity Investment Agreement: Practitioner Drafting and Negotiation Checklist covering Subscription, Warranties, Board Governance, Investor Protections, Transfers, Covenants, Exits and General Provisions

Parties Who are the parties involved? In particular, specify: the investor(s) the managers the investee company (newco) Conditions Are there any conditions to completing the investment? What are each party’s obligations to meet those conditions, and by what deadline? Share subscription What will the investee company’s capital structure be? Which class and how many shares will each shareholder (the investor, the managers and any other shareholders) subscribe for? Warranties Who will give the warranties? Is it limited to the managers? Will they be provided jointly, jointly and severally, or on a several basis? How wide will the warranties be? It is usual for investment agreement warranties to centre on the business plan and the managers, as the acquisition agreement generally affords the investor sufficient protection regarding the company. What restrictions will apply to warranty claims? These may include: periods within which claims must be notified caps on each warrantor’s liability and on...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Warranty

FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart: process to exercise step-in rights under a collateral warranty

The defined terms in the flowchart shall have the following meaning: Appointed Representative Regulations — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Appointed Representatives) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/1217 Business Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) Order 2001, SI 2001/1177 Exemption Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Exemption) Order 2001, SI 2001/1201 Non-Exempt Activities Order — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Professions) (Non-Exempt Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/1227 PRA-regulated activities — denotes regulated activities designated as PRA‑regulated activities under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (PRA‑regulated Activities) Order 2013, SI 2013/556 RAO — the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, SI 2001/544 UCITS qualifier — carries the meaning attributed to it in the Glossary of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook To determine whether an activity is regulated, follow the flowchart below. Click below to view or print...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
JCT Design and Build Contract 2024/2016: Interim Payment Procedure Flowchart

Legal Issues General comments This Checklist highlights the principal provisions and matters to consider when drafting and negotiating time of the essence clauses. What to watch out for For a Precedent time of the essence clause with comprehensive drafting notes, see Precedent: Time of the essence clause. For guidance on time of the essence, the exceptions to the general rule, and practical considerations for customers and suppliers, see Practice Note: Time of the essence. Nature of the term: condition, innominate term or warranty Time is of the essence where the parties expressly state that time will be of the essence. If time is of the essence, delay may entitle a party to terminate the contract and to claim damages. Without express wording, time will be of the essence only if it is a condition of the contract. Where the timing provision is interpreted as an innominate term or a warranty, the remedy is generally confined to damages, unless the breach is very serious or...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Appropriate consent (DAML) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 335: SAR process flowchart and required actions for lawyers

This flowchart illustrates a possible step-in rights procedure that might appear within a collateral warranty. The specific terms of any step-in rights set out in the relevant collateral warranty should always be reviewed before seeking to exercise such rights in practice. To view or download in PDF format, please click the link below...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Warranty

NEWS
Measure of damages: breach of warranty v misrepresentation in a law firm sale; continuing representations and assessing loss absent valuation evidence—Karim v Wemyss, Court of Appeal (England and Wales)

Practical implications This judgment: offers a clear and carefully set out account (with hypothetical examples) of the difference between how damages are assessed in contract and in tort underlines the importance of ensuring that suitable and necessary valuation evidence is put before the court for determination. Although the absence of such evidence did not prevent the court from arriving at a damages figure payable for breach of warranty, the task would have been more straightforward had that material been placed before the court, and it is ordinarily sensible to make sure it is hints at the potential value, in claims of this type, of pleading both damages for breach of warranty and, where the facts allow, an alternative tort claim for misrepresentation (especially if fraudulent). In this matter, however, it was the contractual warranty claim that enabled Mr Karim to recover What was the breach of warranty claim? Mr Wemyss sold his business (a law practice) to Mr Karim under...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Offshore wind foundations and fitness for purpose: MT Højgaard v E.ON - design life warranties, testing obligations and 'business common sense' construction (England and Wales Court of Appeal)

Original news MT Højgaard a/s v EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd and another [2015] EWCA Civ 407 The parties entered into a contract for the design and installation of offshore wind turbines. Defects arose in the foundations, prompting a dispute over who should bear the cost of remedial works. At first instance, the judge decided the claimant contractor had breached a warranty that the foundations would provide a 20‑year service life, but had not breached other clauses alleged by the defendant employers. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the claimant’s appeal, finding there was no such warranty. The defendants’ cross‑appeal also succeeded, as the claimant had failed to comply with a provision concerning testing of the designs. What was this case about? The dispute centres on a specific design issue of fundamental concern to the various stakeholders involved in the design and construction of offshore wind farms. For context, it is helpful to grasp the technical set‑up—an offshore wind farm is, in...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Lonham Group Ltd v Scotbeef Ltd: Court of Appeal on warranties v representations, fair presentation, conditions precedent and contracting out under the Insurance Act 2015 (England and Wales)

Lonham Group Ltd v Scotbeef Ltd & another [2025] EWCA Civ 203 Traditionally, English insurance law placed onerous burdens on insured parties: they were required to reveal every material circumstance capable of affecting the judgment of a prudent insurer when setting the premium or determining whether to accept the risk. If they did not, the insurer could treat the policy as though it never existed. Likewise, any failure to comply with a warranty discharged the insurer from liability under the policy, regardless of the warranty’s relevance to the risk and irrespective of whether the breach was later remedied. In the early development of insurance, these severe rules were arguably justified by the informational imbalance between insured and insurer. By the twenty-first century, however, a more sophisticated market generated pressure for reform. For non-consumer insurance, the result was IA 2015, which marked a substantial change in approach. The previous duty of disclosure was replaced by a duty of fair presentation, and only in defined circumstances could an...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Warranty

PRACTICE NOTES
UK private equity buyouts: due diligence, disclosure letters, timing, investor- and seller-led processes, data rooms, vendor due diligence and key tasks for lawyers

This Practice Note forms part of the Lexis+® UK Corporate private equity buyout transaction toolkit. Timing Due diligence is typically undertaken after heads of terms are signed and confidentiality arrangements are in place. It then proceeds in parallel with negotiation of the main sale documents (share purchase agreement and associated ancillary papers) and the equity documents (investment agreement, senior debt (loan facility) agreement and, if required, loan note instruments). Most diligence is carried out early in the deal to enable the parties to agree suitable warranty and/or indemnity protection in the formal papers, and to support the seller’s and target management’s disclosures against their respective warranties. Disclosure letters are drafted and negotiated alongside the share purchase agreement and the investment agreement, and executed at the same time as those instruments. A first draft disclosure letter is usually produced only once diligence is well progressed and initial drafts of the relevant documents have already been circulated. What happens during this phase? Due diligence The private...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK private equity buyouts (including MBOs): key preliminary corporate, financing, regulatory, tax and risk issues

This Practice Note forms part of the Lexis+® UK Corporate private equity buyout transaction toolkit. Beyond choosing between a share sale and an asset sale structure, a range of matters should be weighed at the outset of a private equity buyout (MBO), before due diligence begins and the principal transaction documents are negotiated. These matters can influence the core commercial and legal terms, so each side is well advised to address them before settling any headline terms (and before executing heads of terms for both the acquisition and equity elements) and before fixing the transaction timetable. The topics outlined below (and in the Practice Notes referenced in this sub‑phase) may remain relevant throughout the deal, particularly during negotiation of the formal documentation, but they are highlighted early because lawyers for all interested parties ought to consider them and brief their clients as soon as possible. Corporate issues to consider Selected corporate law points are outlined below; applicability will vary with the nature of the deal and the parties...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Preliminary EHS issues in private M&A: heads of terms, data room, and allocating environmental liabilities in asset versus share purchases

Heads of terms A business purchase (the target business) typically starts with settling the key commercial points—price, structure of the deal, due diligence steps, exclusivity provisions and timetable. These points are commonly negotiated by the parties themselves, or alongside their accountants and other professional advisers, and then set out in heads of terms, sometimes called a ‘letter of intent’ or ‘memorandum of understanding’. See Practice Note: Heads of terms—share and asset purchases. Where environmental risks are known or suspected, the heads of terms might cover: providing the buyer with any existing environmental report(s) a requirement for a reliance agreement or collateral warranty, giving the buyer the benefit of those report(s) a process allowing the buyer to undertake a phase 1 environmental audit or phase 2 ground investigations headline terms for an environmental indemnity or environmental insurance What happens during the preliminary phase?...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Warranty

PRECEDENTS
Sanctions definitions, warranties and compliance undertakings for share purchase agreement (pro-seller, individual sellers, unconditional long form): clause 1 and Schedule 4 insertions

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-seller—individual sellers—unconditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity • any conduct subject to sanctions set by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctioning Body • the UK, USA, EU and any other relevant authority imposing/administering sanctions; Sanctioned Entity • any person or entity that is, or is owned/controlled (directly or indirectly, per Sanctions Laws) by, a party sanctioned or listed by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctions Laws • all applicable law on Sanctioned Activities binding any Party or this Agreement’s performance; Sanctions Policy • the Sellers’ sanctions policy in Appendix [ insert Appendix number ], as updated and notified to the Buyer; 1.2 The Sellers and the Group Companies, as at the date of this Agreement and throughout its term: are not Sanctioned Entities; have not been notified of any investigation into a Sanctioned Activity; are unaware of Business circumstances that could give rise...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance warranties and definitions for pro-buyer conditional share purchase agreement with individual sellers (long-form)

Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—individual sellers—conditional—long form Add the following as new definitions into clause 1 of the above stated, named precedent document herein...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance definitions, seller warranties, due diligence and notification undertakings for pro-buyer share purchase agreement (corporate seller, conditional, long form)

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—corporate seller—conditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity: activity subject to a Sanctioning Body’s sanctions. Sanctioning Body: United Kingdom, United States of America, European Union, and any other authority administering sanctions. Sanctioned Entity: any person or entity that is, or is owned or controlled (directly or indirectly) by one that is, sanctioned or on a designated list of a Sanctioning Body; ‘owned or controlled directly or indirectly’ has the meaning in Sanctions Laws. Sanctions Laws: all law on a Sanctioned Activity binding either Party or the Agreement’s performance. Sanctions Policy: the Seller’s sanctions policy in Appendix [insert Appendix number], as updated and notified to the Buyer. is not a Sanctioned Entity; has not been notified of any Sanctioned Activity investigation; is unaware of Business circumstances likely to prompt such investigation; shall comply with Sanctions Laws and the Sanctions Policy; ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Warranty

Q&As
Do buyer's warranty-claim costs count in liability thresholds?

Contract law regulates the recoverable loss arising under a limitation of liability provision in a share purchase agreement where a warranty is breached. Warranties comprise contractual declarations or assurances concerning the state of the target company, its operations, assets and liabilities. Should a seller provide a warranty in a share purchase agreement that later turns out inaccurate, untrue or misleading, the buyer may pursue a breach of warranty claim and seek damages from the seller for losses thereby suffered by the buyer...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Brexit model clauses for service agreements: UK and cross-border sales

Brexit—Commercial For help with your query, please refer to the following: Brexit—contract clauses and resources—checklist [Archived] Clause: Brexit—warranty for commercial contracts clause [Archived] Clause: Territory definition For additional guidance, see: Brexit collection...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
NHBC warranty: who covers communal parts defects after year 2?

We have taken it that, because communal areas are mentioned, the property in question is a block of flats. For the first two years after completion of the initial sale of a new-build property, defects cover is supplied, under National House Building Council (NHBC) Buildmark, by the builder, who is responsible for putting right any faults that arise in the property and that then fall within the scope of the policy...

Read More Right Arrow