Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Warranty limitations

Warranty limitations meaning

What does Warranty limitations mean?
Warranty limitations are the negotiated contractual restrictions on a seller’s liability for breach of warranties in M&A documents, typically a share purchase agreement (SPA) or asset purchase agreement (APA). The expression is descriptive (not statutory) and is used consistently across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, though enforceability is subject to each jurisdiction’s controls on exclusion and limitation clauses. Key features commonly include: an aggregate liability cap (with higher or separate caps for fundamental or tax warranties); time limits for notifying and issuing proceedings (often longer for tax); financial thresholds (de minimis and basket, deductible or tipping); qualification by disclosures; exclusions of certain losses; no double recovery; mitigation obligations; detailed claim notification and conduct provisions; set-off and escrow arrangements; allocation of recoveries (e.g. third-party claims, insurance) and interaction with W&I insurance; and fraud or wilful concealment carve-outs. In the UK, reasonableness tests under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and restrictions on excluding liability for misrepresentation (e.g. Misrepresentation Act 1967 in England & Wales and equivalent legislation in Northern Ireland) may apply; Scots law applies similar statutory reasonableness tests. In Ireland, comparable common law principles and statutory controls govern such clauses. Fraud cannot generally be excluded.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Warranty limitations

CHECKLISTS
Environmental Report Review for Lawyers: Due Diligence, Reliance, Liabilities, Hazards and Compliance (England and Wales)

Who was the report commissioned for? Your client may have no entitlement to rely on a report that was not commissioned for them. If it was prepared for a different party, review the report’s terms and conditions, or the consultant’s appointment, to identify any express provision: authorising third parties to rely on the report, or mandating a collateral warranty or reliance letter to be issued in a pre-agreed form Where neither an express term nor a pre-agreed collateral warranty exists, consider seeking: a bespoke collateral warranty extending reliance to your client an assignment transferring the report to your client a reliance letter addressed to your client the report to be readdressed to your client, on clear terms and conditions to rely on the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, unless its operation is excluded in the terms and conditions It is also essential to confirm for whom the report was commissioned,...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Warranty limitations

NEWS
EU competition daily: CJEU confirms potential-effects standard under Article 101 for car warranty restrictions; Commission merger clearances and FSR filing (5 December 2024)

Court of Justice rules on Latvian reference concerning Article 101 TFEU and limits in car warranties The Court of Justice has delivered its judgment in Case C- 606/23, Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp and KIA Auto, following a national reference from Latvia. The referring court sought clarification on the application of Article 101 TFEU to agreements that introduce restrictions connected with car warranties... Background The request arose in proceedings between ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’ AS and ‘KIA Auto’ AS, on one side, and the Konkurences padome (Competition Council) on the other. It concerns a financial penalty imposed in relation to the conclusion of a vertical agreement that introduced limitations regarding the motor vehicle warranty...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Warranty limitations

PRACTICE NOTES
Subscription and shareholders’ agreements in venture capital deals: drafting guidance on conditions, warranties, governance, reserved matters and investor protections (England and Wales)

Subscription and shareholders’ agreement This Practice Note offers guidance for drafters preparing and/or reviewing a subscription and shareholders’ agreement relating to the allotment of shares (and, potentially, loan notes) in a private limited company incorporated in England and Wales by a private equity (or venture capital) fund investor (the investor) within a venture capital (VC) deal, where the structure provides for split exchange and completion, ie conditions must be met before completion of the subscription and shareholders’ agreement. The investment contemplated is into an existing company (the Company), with the current shareholders (typically the business’s founders) keeping the shares they have already been issued in the Company. Set out below are matters to weigh up when drafting and/or reviewing the principal provisions of a subscription and shareholders’ agreement (SSA). Parties The investee company Although the principal parties to the SSA will be the relevant investor and the Company’s founders, the Company will ordinarily be included as a party too, ie the vehicle in which the investor...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Collateral warranties: drafting and case law on 'no greater liability' and equivalent defences, set-off, contributory negligence and limitation periods

’No greater liability’ provisions frequently appear in collateral warranties (and third party rights memoranda). They are intended to ensure the warrantor’s exposure under the warranty mirrors, and does not exceed, that assumed in the original contract. Yet the wording of such provisions is often contested and, on occasion, gives rise to outcomes the parties did not intend. Poorly balanced formulations may, therefore, distort the allocation of risk that the parties thought they had agreed from the outset or envisaged. Collateral warranties—general principles Commercial practice generally accepts that when a party grants a warranty collateral to an underlying agreement, it should not assume obligations or duties under that warranty that are broader or endure longer than those owed under the original agreement. Indeed, professional indemnity policies commonly withhold cover for collateral warranty claims where the liability stems from obligations more burdensome than those in the original or underlying contract. In British Overseas Bank v Stewart Milne, the court acknowledged that the basic commercial purpose of collateral warranties is central...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Share purchases: employment warranties, disclosure (including standards), seller knowledge/awareness, limitations (caps, floors, buckets), split exchange and completion, claims procedures and indemnities

This Practice Note This Practice Note sets out guidance on warranties, disclosure and indemnities for advisers handling the employment elements of acquiring all the issued share capital of a company, ie a share purchase. It explains how these topics sit alongside the due diligence exercise and outlines potential constraints on warranties, such as caps, floors and collars (or buckets), together with the seller’s knowledge or awareness and the scope of disclosure. Where the purchaser acquires the entire issued share capital of the employing company (a share purchase), the shareholders may change, but the employee–employer contractual relationship remains intact; the share deal itself does not effect a change of employer or alter the contract of employment. This is different from an asset acquisition, where the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246 (TUPE 2006) operate to transfer the contracts of affected employees to the buyer. TUPE 2006 also affords specific protection for employees concerning variation of terms and dismissal, creates duties to inform and consult, and requires...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Warranty limitations

PRECEDENTS
Buyer-favourable warranty and tax covenant limitations schedule for corporate seller SPAs: periods, caps, de minimis, specific exclusions, claims conduct, third-party recoveries and mitigation

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed • means information [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] and presented with sufficient clarity and detail to allow a buyer to reach a clear, informed and accurate evaluation of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances concerned; Losses • means any and all liabilities, costs, outgoings (including legal expenses), claims, actions, proceedings, damages, fines, penalties, loss of profit [ and Consequential Loss ]; Tax Warranties • denotes the warranties [ and representations ] contained in paragraph [ insert number ] of Schedule [ insert number ], and Tax Warranty refers to any one of them; Warranties • signifies the warranties [ and representations ] included in Schedule [...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Long-form pro-seller share purchase agreement precedent for private company—individual sellers, conditional completion, pre-completion undertakings, warranty limitations and tax covenant (England and Wales)

This Agreement is dated [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties The several persons whose names and addresses appear in Schedule 1 (together, the Sellers); and [ Insert name of purchasing corporate entity ], incorporated in [ England and Wales OR [ insert country of incorporation ] ] with registered number [ insert company number ] and whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the Buyer); and [ (each Seller and the Buyer being a Party, and together the Sellers and the Buyer being the Parties). ] Background The Company (as defined below) is a private company limited by shares, incorporated in [ England and Wales OR [ insert country of incorporation ] ]. Details of the Company are set out in Schedule 2, Part A. The Sellers are the legal and beneficial holders of the Sale Shares (as defined below), which in total constitute the entire issued and allotted share...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Pro-buyer seller warranty operative provisions for share purchase agreements: definitions, fair disclosure test, knowledge qualifiers, repetition at completion, buyer reliance, limitations carve-outs, and third-party rights

Add the following as additional definitions (where not already present) within the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed means [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] in such a way, and with such detail, as to enable a buyer to make a clear, informed and accurate assessment of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances; Warranties means the warranties [ and representations ] set out in Schedule [ insert number ] and Warranty means any one of them; Warranty Claim means a claim (for damages, compensation or any other relief) by the Buyer under any Warranty in respect of any event, matter or circumstance that is inconsistent with, contrary to, or involves, relates to or otherwise constitutes a breach of any of the Warranties, and Warranty Claims...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Warranty limitations

Q&As
Do buyer's warranty-claim costs count in liability thresholds?

Contract law regulates the recoverable loss arising under a limitation of liability provision in a share purchase agreement where a warranty is breached. Warranties comprise contractual declarations or assurances concerning the state of the target company, its operations, assets and liabilities. Should a seller provide a warranty in a share purchase agreement that later turns out inaccurate, untrue or misleading, the buyer may pursue a breach of warranty claim and seek damages from the seller for losses thereby suffered by the buyer...

Read More Right Arrow