Waterfall (of payments/recoveries) meaning

HMRC guidance on compromises using Part 26 schemes and Part 26A restructuring plans In corporate insolvencies, HMRC commonly ranks as a secondary preferential and/or unsecured creditor (see Practice Note: Waterfall of payments—a comparative guide), a status that often serves as the relevant comparator or alternative to a Part 26 scheme or a Part 26A restructuring plan. On 1 November 2023, HMRC issued guidance covering compromises under Part 26 schemes (see: Schemes of arrangement—overview) and Part 26A restructuring plans (see: Restructuring plan—overview) (see: HMRC publishes guidance on using debt management schemes to restructure finances—LNB News 15/11/2023 13). Practitioners should take account of this guidance whenever a proposed scheme/plan includes HMRC as a creditor. HMRC will only back a restructuring where it considers there is a realistic prospect of success. If HMRC does not consider success realistic, it will engage with the scheme/plan proponent to explore other means of repaying HMRC’s debt, which may involve a formal insolvency process. The debtor must have submitted all outstanding...

Re Avanti Communications Ltd [2023] EWHC 940 (Ch) This marks the first substantial judgment on the divide between fixed and floating charges since the House of Lords’ landmark ruling in Re Spectrum Plus [2005] UKHL 41, which reclassified an apparent fixed charge over book debts as floating because the chargor could freely deploy the charged assets and the security holder therefore lacked the requisite control to constitute a fixed charge. The designation of security as ‘fixed’ or ‘floating’ under English law now carries even greater weight given HMRC (the UK tax authority) ranks as a preferential creditor for certain taxes in insolvency—ie those taxes sit behind fixed charge realisations but ahead of floating charge realisations. That characterisation had a decisive effect on the order of payments in Avanti’s administration: as the charge was properly treated as fixed, the secured creditors recovered in full; had it instead been treated as floating, part of the proceeds would have been payable to HMRC (as preferential creditor) and to unsecured creditors up to...

Mayfair Capital Residential 2 LLP v Reim Katch Securities Ltd [2024] EWHC 1920 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? In Mayfair Capital, the court concluded that an intercreditor deed permitted ongoing ‘permitted payments’ to the junior lender, notwithstanding the appointment of a receiver. The application of proceeds clause, which directs amounts received by the lenders to be applied first in discharge of the senior debt and then the junior debt, was held, by necessary implication, to operate subject to the permitted payments provision. Accordingly, the permitted payments regime prevailed over that clause to this extent. The decision is a helpful reminder to practitioners to ensure intercreditor agreements and deeds of priority contain express payment stops (where this is commercially agreed). Further, where the parties intend the way in which proceeds are applied to differ before and after enforcement, this should be made clear within the agreement. What was the background? The focus of the dispute was the proper interpretation of particular provisions in...

Liquidation Following enforcement of security by fixed charge creditors for their own benefit, the order of distributions in a winding up is: if liquidation commences within 12 weeks of a moratorium, any unpaid moratorium debts and ‘priority pre‑moratorium debts’ to which no payment holiday applied during the moratorium expenses properly incurred in the winding up (including the liquidator’s remuneration) ordinary preferential debts secondary preferential debts the prescribed part for unsecured creditors (where not disapplied) debts secured by floating charges unsecured debts statutory interest postponed debts (i.e. non‑provable liabilities) return of any surplus to members (subject to adjustment between members) For further details, see Practice Note: Waterfall of payments in liquidation...

In both corporate and personal insolvency, office-holders chiefly gather the company’s or individual’s assets, realise them and distribute the proceeds to creditors in accordance with the statutory waterfall. For more detail, consult the following Practice Notes: Waterfall of payments—a comparative guide Waterfall of payments in administration Waterfall of payments in liquidation Waterfall of payments in bankruptcy Waterfall of payments in administrative receivership Pari passu distribution Pari passu, a Latin term, translates as ‘with an equal step’ or ‘on equal footing’. In insolvency, it captures the principle of proportionality and is used to describe how creditors are treated relative to one another. Where claims rank ‘pari passu’, all creditors within the same class are paid alike, with no one preferred. If funds are insufficient to satisfy debts in full, distributions are made pro rata on a pari passu basis, so each receives a proportionate return. For instance, unsecured creditors (ie creditors in the same category) might receive 10p...

Software development—in brief A software development agreement applies when a customer retains or commissions a software developer to design, build, test and, at times, install and maintain tailor-made software. Development activity is also commonly a core element of systems integration agreements as well. These contracts deal with the acquisition, development and integration of an entire IT system, comprising both hardware and software components. The software strand often entails the developer or integrator producing a substantial share of bespoke or modified software. In each scenario, the payment mechanism that sets out which fees the customer must pay (and when those payments fall due) is a crucial feature which—together with other contractual terms, including limits and exclusions on the developer’s liability for contract breach, the calculation of liquidated damages for late delivery by the developer, and the warranties and indemnities the developer gives to the customer—shapes how risk is allocated between the parties involved. The extent to which risk shifts from the customer to the developer will be determined by the...

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the articles of association of the relevant company: A Ordinary Shares — refers to the A ordinary shares of [ insert amount ] each comprised within the share capital of the Company; Available Profits — signifies profits that are distributable as construed under the Companies Act; B Ordinary Shares — denotes the B ordinary shares of [ insert amount ] apiece forming part of the Company’s capital; Issue Price — indicates the price at which the relevant Share is allotted, being the combined total of amounts paid or treated as paid in respect of its nominal value together with any share premium applicable; Preference Dividend — means the dividend payable in accordance with Article [ insert number of article dealing with company dividend payments ]; Preference ...

This limited partnership Agreement is entered into on [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of general partner ] of [ insert address ] (the General Partner); and Each of the persons named in Schedule 1, Part B. BACKGROUND The Limited Partnership is registered as a limited partnership and designated as a private fund limited partnership in England under the LPA 1907 with number LP [ insert number ]. The General Partner has agreed to act as the general partner of the Limited Partnership and to manage the business of the Limited Partnership, and the Limited Partners have agreed to make Contributions to the Limited Partnership on the terms set out below. The General Partner and the Limited Partners intend that the Limited Partnership will carry on the Business and agree to regulate the affairs of the Limited Partnership on the terms set out below. ...

This Limited Partnership Agreement is entered into on [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] by and between the parties set out below. Parties [ insert name of general partner ] of [ insert address ] (the General Partner); and Each of the persons whose names are listed in Schedule 1, Part B. BACKGROUND The Limited Partnership has been registered in England as a limited partnership under the LPA 1907 with number LP [ insert number ]. The General Partner has agreed to act as the general partner of the Limited Partnership and to manage, operate and administer the business of the Limited Partnership, and the Limited Partners have agreed to make Contributions to the Limited Partnership on the terms set out below. The General Partner and the Limited Partners wish the Limited Partnership to carry on the Business and agree that the affairs of the Limited Partnership shall be regulated in accordance with...