Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Waterfall Provisions

Waterfall Provisions meaning

/ˈwɔːtəfɔːl/ /prəˈvɪʒ(ə)n/
What does Waterfall Provisions mean?
Clauses that set the order in which profits, sale proceeds or surplus capital are paid to shareholders. In practice, “waterfall provisions” appear in shareholders’ agreements, investment agreements and (to be effective against the company) the articles of association. The term is descriptive rather than defined by legislation or case law, and is used across corporate and joint venture transactions. A waterfall typically ranks payments in tiers, for example: costs and third‑party debt; repayment of shareholder loans (and accrued interest); return of subscribed or paid‑up capital; any preferred return or hurdle; then remaining amounts to ordinary shareholders pro rata. It may govern ongoing distributions, and distributions or capital returns on an exit, sale of the business, or liquidation of a joint venture company. Key drafting issues include alignment with company law rules on lawful distributions and capital maintenance, class rights and consents, tax, and ensuring the waterfall binds all relevant parties. Usage and legal effect are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Distinct from the statutory insolvency “waterfall” for creditor priorities, which follows separate rules.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Waterfall Provisions

NEWS
English High Court clarifies distressed disposal clauses in intercreditor agreements: cash via set-off, unconditional release of primary creditors, and creditor reinvestment post‑restructuring (Galapagos Bidco Sarl v Kebekus)

Galapagos Bidco Sarl v Kebekus [2023] EWHC 1931 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision offers useful clarification on the interpretation of familiar provisions and expressions found in the ‘distressed disposals’ clause of English law intercreditor agreements. The court scrutinised the distressed disposal mechanics in an English law-governed intercreditor to decide whether the restructuring had been properly implemented. A central question was whether the sale of the insolvent group could be treated as being ‘for cash’, notwithstanding that creditors of the insolvent group subscribed for notes in the newly reorganised group and set off the subscription monies against their entitlements under the payment waterfall. The court also considered whether that investment meant the relevant creditors’ claims had not been unconditionally released at the same time as the sale, as the intercreditor required. The court concluded that the restructuring was validly carried out, providing reassurance to senior creditors and companies that such terms do not prevent creditors from investing in the new group after a...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Re Avanti: England and Wales High Court eases fixed charge characterisation over income-generating fixed assets; Spectrum nuanced; LMA disposals upheld; reduced returns for HMRC and prescribed part

Re Avanti Communications Ltd (in administration) [2023] EWHC 940 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? Avanti is poised to carry three major consequences for restructuring lawyers, insolvency litigators, and finance lawyers. First, the ruling lowers the bar for taking fixed security, notably over fixed assets. It confirms that the Spectrum analysis is nuanced, and that absolute control is not a prerequisite for a fixed charge. The assets in Avanti were ‘fixed’ income‑producing capital assets rather than receivables or stock‑in‑trade, leaving charges over such property, in particular, less susceptible to recharacterisation. Second, although the facility documentation was intricate, it drew on Loan Market Association (LMA) templates. Those contracts included permissions for the debtor to dispose of assets where (among other conditions) proceeds were paid through a creditor ‘waterfall’, or where assets had become obsolete. Avanti confirms that these permissions, and other provisions that cede a measure of control back to the debtor, do not automatically reclassify a fixed charge as floating. Third, if it is easier...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Intercreditor Deeds: Junior Permitted Payments Continue After Receiver's Appointment, Taking Priority Over Application-of-Proceeds Waterfall Until £1.5m Cap (Mayfair Capital v Reim Katch, England and Wales)

Mayfair Capital Residential 2 LLP v Reim Katch Securities Ltd [2024] EWHC 1920 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? In Mayfair Capital, the court concluded that an intercreditor deed permitted ongoing ‘permitted payments’ to the junior lender, notwithstanding the appointment of a receiver. The application of proceeds clause, which directs amounts received by the lenders to be applied first in discharge of the senior debt and then the junior debt, was held, by necessary implication, to operate subject to the permitted payments provision. Accordingly, the permitted payments regime prevailed over that clause to this extent. The decision is a helpful reminder to practitioners to ensure intercreditor agreements and deeds of priority contain express payment stops (where this is commercially agreed). Further, where the parties intend the way in which proceeds are applied to differ before and after enforcement, this should be made clear within the agreement. What was the background? The focus of the dispute was the proper interpretation of particular provisions in...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Waterfall Provisions

PRACTICE NOTES
LMA LIBOR-based interest provisions: screen rate calculation and fallbacks, intra-day refixing policies, zero floors, confidentiality, and Replacement of Screen Rate amendments [Archived]

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This archived Practice Note is no longer updated. It outlines the Loan Market Association (LMA)’s method for calculating interest in its LIBOR-based facility documentation. It reviews the interest calculation clause—covering margin, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) or another benchmark, plus mandatory costs—before concentrating on how the benchmark rate (such as LIBOR) is derived. How LMA documents define and compute LIBOR, EURIBOR or an alternative benchmark, including calculation of the Screen Rate—see Definition of LIBOR, EURIBOR and Benchmark Rate in LMA documents and Definition of Screen Rate in LMA documents Drafting implications of ICE Benchmark Administration Limited assuming responsibility for administering LIBOR Drafting effects of the ICE LIBOR Error Policy and the Euribor Intraday Refixing Policy, which set out refixing and republication of LIBOR and EURIBOR respectively—see Intra-day correction, recalculation or republication of a Screen Rate The fallback waterfall where the Screen Rate is unavailable for...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Intercreditor Agreements: Waterfalls, Flip Clauses and Anti-Deprivation, Requisite Majorities, CMBS Special Servicer Controls, and Reasonable Consent - UK Case Law and Drafting Guidance

Background The purpose of an intercreditor agreement—also called a deed of priority—is to manage and resolve the conflicts that will inevitably emerge between different classes of secured lender during a restructuring. Waterfall of payments Such an agreement commonly details a distribution waterfall instructing the security trustee on how to deploy any funds it receives (including sale proceeds, litigation recoveries, or amounts originally paid in error by a debtor to a junior creditor and then transferred under turnover provisions). The waterfall may apply either: (i) universally in all situations; or (ii) by distinguishing between ordinary operations (pre-enforcement) and post-enforcement, namely via a ‘flip’ clause. Ordinarily, the waterfall requires the security trustee’s fees to be settled first, after which monies are distributed to creditors in line with their ranking (with secured lenders typically at the top of the order), and any remaining balance is ultimately returned to the debtors...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU and UK EMIR: post‑Brexit divergence tracker and article‑by‑article analysis of EMIR 3, FSMA 2023 and CCP, clearing, reporting, margin and trade repository requirements

This Practice Note traces differences between European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (EU EMIR) and Assimilated Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (UK EMIR). How to use this Practice Note Use this Practice Note as a navigational aid when reviewing Assimilated Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (UK EMIR), by comparing it with the parallel provisions in Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (EU EMIR). Set out below are links to all Articles and Annexes in UK EMIR and EU EMIR respectively. Each section provides: the relevant Articles and Annexes as they currently stand, including: the latest changes made, when they were made, and details of the implementing/amending/repealing legislation proposed reforms to specified Articles a brief summary of points of divergence (ie how the relevant Article or Annex has evolved in the UK and/or the EU since 31 December 2020, being the end of the Brexit transition period) The degree of variance between the regimes is signposted as...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Waterfall Provisions

PRECEDENTS
Articles of association drafting: return of capital and sale proceeds waterfall for preference, A ordinary and B ordinary shares (private equity/venture capital)

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the articles of association of the relevant company: A Ordinary Shares — refers to the A ordinary shares of [ insert amount ] each comprised within the share capital of the Company; Available Profits — signifies profits that are distributable as construed under the Companies Act; B Ordinary Shares — denotes the B ordinary shares of [ insert amount ] apiece forming part of the Company’s capital; Issue Price — indicates the price at which the relevant Share is allotted, being the combined total of amounts paid or treated as paid in respect of its nominal value together with any share premium applicable; Preference Dividend — means the dividend payable in accordance with Article [ insert number of article dealing with company dividend payments ]; Preference ...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Companies Act 2006 private company articles: precedent amendments for growth (A Ordinary) shares with threshold price waterfall, investor rights, leaver, drag and tag provisions

1 Model Articles 1.1 Save to the extent that these Articles amend, disapply or conflict with them, the Model Articles govern the Company. Subject to any such amendments, disapplications or conflicts, the Model Articles, together with these Articles, comprise the Company’s articles of association, to the exclusion of any other articles or regulations contained in any statute, statutory instrument or other subordinate legislation. 1.2 The following provisions of the Model Articles shall have no effect in relation to the Company: 11(2) (quorum for directors’ meetings), 12 (chairing of directors’ meetings), 13 (casting vote), 14(1)–(5) (conflicts of interest), 21 (all shares to be fully paid up), 26(5) (share transfers), 30(5)–(7) (procedure for declaring dividends), 39 (chairing general meetings), 42 (voting: general), 44(2) (poll votes), 50 (no right to inspect accounts and other records), 51 (provision for employees on cessation of business), 52 (indemnity) and 53 (insurance)...

Read More Right Arrow