Wholly-owned subsidiary meaning

HMRC v Sehgal and another [2024] UKUT 74 (TCC) The taxpayers were non-domiciled individuals resident in the UK who were taxed on the remittance basis. They disposed of their shareholdings in VGL to CLS, a Luxembourg-resident company. At completion, IRL—owned indirectly via a Jersey vehicle, SKS—owed £6m to a subsidiary of VGL. Under the share purchase agreement, the taxpayers agreed to indemnify that liability. Soon afterwards, it emerged the debt was irrecoverable, thereby triggering the indemnity. At the behest of CLS’s parent, a structured sequence followed: SKS purchased clothing stock from M, another company within the CLS group, for a sum mirroring the amount owed; at the same time, CLS and the taxpayers entered into a side letter confirming that this payment would reduce the outstanding debt to nil. Under these arrangements, the consideration for the clothing matched the £6m debt and, as recorded in the side letter, operated to eliminate the balance in full. The clothing, however, was worth merely £200,000 and was then gifted...

Sarabande v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 93 (TC) SB, a registered charity, holds a long lease of a central London property (the Building). Suture Inc Ltd (SIL), SB’s wholly owned subsidiary, is not VAT-registered. In 2018, SB opted for voluntary VAT registration and sought to recover £341,487.31 of VAT incurred on purchasing and refurbishing the Building. The project transformed what had been a warehouse-style area into art studios, gallery space and meeting rooms. SB’s objective was to create a venue to nurture an artists’ community, and it devised a structured support scheme for artists called the ‘Accelerator Programme’. Through this programme, artists were offered curated, subsidised space, comprising studio and exhibition areas together with a bundle of benefits, including use of professional equipment, guidance from sector specialists and hands-on assistance from as well as advice from industry experts and practical support offered by SB within the Building to participants in the scheme on a structured basis throughout...

What is a captive insurance company? A captive insurer is a fully owned subsidiary set up to manage and mitigate the risks of its parent and related entities. When the parent cannot secure appropriate cover from the traditional market for certain risks Premiums paid into the captive can generate savings for the parent or related parties Ability to place cover with reinsurers that the parent cannot access directly Addresses specific risks not available in the wider insurance market Funds the deductibles on policies purchased by the parent Investment income available to offset losses Improved control over claims Cover tailored to your needs Reduced reliance on commercial insurance Stabilisation of pricing Key takeaways A captive insurer is a wholly owned subsidiary that mitigates risk for its parent and related entities Benefits can include lower insurance costs, potential tax advantages, underwriting earnings, and tighter control over its cover Captive insurance companies...

The company establishing a SIP The company setting up a share incentive plan (SIP) does not need to be the same entity whose shares are allocated. However, both: the shares to be granted, and the connection between the SIP-establishing entity and the company whose shares are issued must satisfy the relevant legislative conditions. A SIP can be created either: solely for employees of the company that establishes it; or for those employees and for employees of other companies it controls (a group plan)—see Constituent companies below. In a group where the parent company’s shares are to be awarded, there are two options: the parent company may establish the SIP and extend it to the appropriate subsidiaries; or each subsidiary may establish its own SIP, provided the other statutory requirements concerning the shares under award are met—see Requirements for the shares. The advantage of each subsidiary operating its...

At a convening hearing held in May 2024, Project Verona Limited sought approval for a Part 26A restructuring plan (RP). The principal points, in brief, are outlined in the summary below (capitalised terms not explained here have the meanings given in the convening and sanction judgments). This Deal Debrief sits within our Restructuring plans collection. Name of plan company Project Verona Limited (the Company), a wholly owned subsidiary within a wider group (the Group) led by Tasty Plc, is the plan company. Industry sector Restaurants sector. Place of debtor’s incorporation and jurisdictional factors England & Wales jurisdiction. The Company executed a deed poll under which it accepted responsibility for certain liabilities owed by the Group...

This Practice Note explores the doctrine of separate legal personality for a registered company, and surveys the relevant case law addressing the narrow situations in which the corporate veil might be pierced. It also separates true piercing or lifting of the veil from the more routine instances in which the veil is sidestepped by reliance on another legal or equitable entitlement. The analysis underscores the limited nature of this intervention and the authorities that define it. Corporate legal personality—the Salomon principle A duly incorporated company is a person distinct from its members, holding its own rights and bearing its own liabilities as an independent legal subject. This rule, often called the corporate veil or the Salomon principle, was most famously articulated by Lord MacNaghten in Salomon v Salomon: the company, at law, is wholly separate from the subscribers to the memorandum; even if, after incorporation, the undertaking remains exactly as before, with the same individuals managing it and the same people receiving the profits, the company is not...

Insert the following definitions as new definitions into clause 1 of Precedent: Share purchase agreement—pro-buyer—corporate seller—conditional—long form: 1 Definitions and interpretation Sanctioned Activity: activity subject to a Sanctioning Body’s sanctions. Sanctioning Body: United Kingdom, United States of America, European Union, and any other authority administering sanctions. Sanctioned Entity: any person or entity that is, or is owned or controlled (directly or indirectly) by one that is, sanctioned or on a designated list of a Sanctioning Body; ‘owned or controlled directly or indirectly’ has the meaning in Sanctions Laws. Sanctions Laws: all law on a Sanctioned Activity binding either Party or the Agreement’s performance. Sanctions Policy: the Seller’s sanctions policy in Appendix [insert Appendix number], as updated and notified to the Buyer. is not a Sanctioned Entity; has not been notified of any Sanctioned Activity investigation; is unaware of Business circumstances likely to prompt such investigation; shall comply with Sanctions Laws and the Sanctions Policy; ...

Applicant: [ NAME OF WITNESS ] First witness statement; Dated: [ insert ] — Exhibit: [ XX1 ] — Court ref. no: [ INSERT COURT REF. NUMBER ] [ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ] Business and Property Courts [ of England and Wales ] [ in [ INSERT LOCATION ] ] [ Company & Insolvency List (ChD) ] Or [ in the County Court at [ INSERT LOCATION ] ] [ Business and Property Courts List ] Or [ in the High Court of Justice ] [ Chancery Division ] In the matter of [ INVESTMENT BANK NAME ]; in the matter of the Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011; and in the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 WITNESS STATEMENT OF [ WITNESS NAME ] I, [ witness name ], being a director [ and chairperson ] of [ investment bank name ] of [ investment bank address ], state as follows: I serve as [...

This Guarantee is entered into on the [ insert number ] day of [ insert month ] 20[ insert year ] by the parties set out below. Parties [ insert name ] (Company No. [ insert number ]) of/whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (the ‘Guarantor’); and [ insert name ] (Company No. [ insert number ]) of/whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (together with its successors and assigns, the ‘Employer’). Background Under a contract dated [ insert date ] (‘the Contract’) made between (1) the Employer and (2) [ insert name ] (‘the Contractor’), the Contractor has undertaken to carry out and complete certain works (‘the Works’) in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the Contract. Pursuant to the Contract, the Contractor has undertaken to secure the provision of a guarantee in the form of this document (the ‘Guarantee’). The Contractor is a wholly owned subsidiary of the...