“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”
Co-OpAccess all documents on Wireless network
In this issue: Media Internet Databases Data protection Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Telecommunications LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Media Getty gets pyrrhic victory in UK stability AI case Law360, London: On 4 November 2025, Getty Images persuaded a London court that artificial intelligence (AI) developer Stability AI had produced a small number of images infringing the stock image company’s trade marks. However, the court was not convinced that the model itself breached the photo giant’s intellectual property in this landmark dispute. See: Getty gets pyrrhic victory in UK stability AI case. Internet Ofcom launches call for evidence on age assurance effectiveness and app store safety under OSA 2023 Ofcom has opened a call for evidence to inform two statutory reports required by the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023). The reports will review...
In this issue: Leasing property Property development Residential property Key developments and horizon scanning LexTalk®Property: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional property updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts Trackers Leasing property Code—terms of renewal lease In EE Ltd v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd [2024] UKUT 216 (LC), the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) fixed the terms of a replacement lease for a telecommunications site under the Electronic Communications Code. The earlier lease had ended and the claimants sought new Code rights from the present landlord. Two issues were in dispute: (1) the conditions allowing the landlord to bring the new lease to an end for redevelopment, and (2) the level of rent or consideration payable. The parties’ valuers advanced divergent figures—£1,000 per annum for the claimants and £2,850 per annum for the respondent. The Tribunal found for the respondent on the break right, permitting termination for redevelopment, including telecoms redevelopment, but only after the fifth...
In this issue: Enfranchisement and right to manage Enforcing security and property insolvency Contractual issues Electronic communications Repairing obligations and dilapidations LexTalk®Property Disputes: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional Property disputes updates Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Enfranchisement and right to manage Failure to serve claim notice did not invalidate transfer of right to manage The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the appeal in A1 Properties (Sunderland) Ltd v Tudor Studios RTM Company Ltd [2024] UKSC 27, concluding that Tudor Studios RTM Company Ltd’s omission to serve a claim notice on A1 Properties (Sunderland) Ltd did not undermine the transfer of the right to manage. The issue concerned the consequence of not complying with section 79(6)(a) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2022 (CLRA 2002). Court of Appeal authority confirms that a missing claim notice does not invariably defeat an RTM company’s acquisition of management rights...
Permitted development rights for telecommunication development Certain types of telecommunication works, eg mobile telephone masts, qualify as permitted development, meaning planning permission is therefore not generally required in practice. For more information and guidance, refer to Practice Notes: Permitted development in England, Permitted development rights and the prior approval system, and Permitted development in Wales. In England, from 4 April 2022, specific permitted development rights for telecommunications were broadened, following a consultation, to advance the UK’s ambition for nationwide gigabit-capable broadband and 4G coverage, with 5G available to most of the population, by 2030. See: LNB News 07/03/2022 53. These revisions are reflected within this Practice Note where relevant. What, then, is permitted?...
Mobile networks This Practice Note delivers a concise, quick-reference overview of the wireless telecoms sector for commercial lawyers. Mobile electronic communications networks are commonly called cellular networks because they consist of a mosaic of cells, arranged to let the network exploit its allocated frequency spectrum with maximum efficiency. A cell is the coverage area served by a base station (BS), and neighbouring cells operate on different frequencies to reduce channel interference. In rural locations, cells span wider areas than in dense urban settings, where additional capacity is needed. GSM networks Global System for Mobile communications (GSM—so named as a backronym, the original title being Groupe Spécial Mobile) is the most widespread network standard. GSM is regarded as 2G (second generation, with the first generation being analogue mobile networks). 2G has evolved from the platform first rolled out in 1991, through the arrival of the packet data capability, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), in 1997 (therefore 2.5G), and further with higher packet data rates from 1999 via the...
CASE HUB Archived This archived case hub sets out the position as at the decision date of 3 March 2022; it is no longer being updated. See also the timeline. Case facts Outline UK merger investigation into the anticipated purchase of the passive infrastructure assets of CK Hutchison Networks Europe Investments S.À R.L in the UK by Cellnex UK Limited. The parties overlap in supplying access to developed macro sites and associated services to wireless communications providers in the UK. Latest developments On 3 March 2022, the CMA published its final report, approving the deal subject to conditions following an in-depth phase 2 investigation. Parties Cellnex UK Limited (Cellnex): Cellnex owns and operates UK sites with passive infrastructure-elevated structures for attaching telecommunications equipment-used by wireless communications providers. Its customers are chiefly mobile network operators (MNOs). Cellnex’s passive infrastructure is also utilised by other communications providers. CK Hutchison group (CK Hutchison): CK Hutchison is a multinational conglomerate based in Hong Kong....
This Agreement is dated [ insert date ] (the Commencement Date) and is entered into by the following: Parties [ insert supplier’s name ], a company registered in [ England and Wales ] with company number [ insert company number ], with its registered office at [ insert registered office ] (the Supplier); and [ insert customer’s name ], a company registered in [ England and Wales ] with company number [ insert company number ], with its registered office at [ insert registered office ] (the Customer), each of the Supplier and the Customer being a party, and together the Supplier and the Customer being the parties. Background The Supplier carries on the business of supplying wi-fi services. The Customer intends to enable its personnel and visitors to access a network of wi-fi hotspots. The Supplier proposes to deliver wi-fi services to the Customer so that the Customer may provide its personnel and visitors with...