Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Withdrawal of consent

Withdrawal of consent meaning

What does Withdrawal of consent mean?
Withdrawal of consent describes an individual telling an organisation that they no longer agree to an activity that previously relied on their consent (for example, processing personal data, receiving direct marketing or accepting cookies). In data protection law, it is expressly recognised by UK GDPR/EU GDPR Article 7(3): a data subject may withdraw consent at any time, and it must be as easy to withdraw as to give. Controllers must inform individuals of this right before consent is obtained, provide simple, free mechanisms (such as unsubscribe links, account settings or cookie preference tools), and act without undue delay or detriment. Withdrawal does not affect the lawfulness of processing before it was given, but processing that relied on consent must cease unless another lawful basis applies. Across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 and PECR require prompt honouring of opt-outs and suppression of further messages. In Ireland, the EU GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 and the ePrivacy Regulations impose equivalent duties. The expression appears in other areas (e.g., medical treatment or sexual consent), where consent can be withdrawn at any time, though consequences are set by the statutes and case law.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Withdrawal of consent

NEWS
UK Public Law update: Brexit/Windsor Framework implementation, new SIs, constitutional scrutiny, subsidy control/State aid, and recent judicial review and equality decisions—week ending 24 October 2024

In this issue: Brexit highlights Post-Brexit transition guidelines Brexit SIs Constitutional and administrative law Subsidy control and State Aid Judicial review Equality and human rights Other Public law news Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New and updated content Useful information Brexit highlights EAC sets out recommendations on future of UK-EU data adequacy The House of Lords European Affairs Committee (EAC) has issued a letter to the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, summarising the principal conclusions and recommendations from its inquiry into UK‑EU data adequacy. It found that the loss of EU data adequacy in June 2025 would bring substantial costs and added administrative burdens for businesses and organisations, create obstacles to international trade and economic co‑operation, and detrimentally affect Northern Ireland under the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement and the Windsor Framework Agreement. The EAC therefore advises that the government engage with...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Local Government Weekly: Social Care Direct Payments, Rent Repayment Defences, Procurement Privilege Waiver, A38 DCO JR, Welsh Language Scheme Ruling, and Policy Updates (DfE, DHSC, Elections) (24 October 2024)

In this issue Social care Social housing Public procurement Planning Judicial review Education Healthcare Governance Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social care Direct payments representative not a standard authorisation of property and affairs deputyship—Lumb (SSB) v NHS Humber and North Yorkshire ICB Managing direct payments from a personal health budget as a ‘representative’ under the National Health Service (Direct Payments) Regulations 2013 does not sit within the usual authorisations of a property and affairs deputyship. A health body may appoint a property and affairs deputy as ‘representative’ under regulation 5(4), yet that role extends beyond the remit of a standard deputyship appointment. Likewise, the functions of a ‘nominee’ under the 2013 Regulations are not encompassed by standard deputyship powers. The Court of Protection can, however, make a targeted appointment granting a deputy authority specifically to oversee direct payments in line with the 2013 Regulations. A case manager is an...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
PI and Clinical Negligence update: England & Wales cases (Conway, Haley, McNamee, Chinda), service by DX (Bellway), Part 36 certainty, APIL CICS reforms, Mazur litigation authorisation fallout, costs sanctions

In this issue: Key PI and Clinical negligence developments Road traffic accidents Clinical negligence Proving negligence or breach of statutory duty Costs and funding Part 36 offers Starting and managing online claims Service in England and Wales Other PI and Clinical negligence developments LexisNexis® PI & Clinical Negligence Quantum Database LexisNexis® Quantum Portal LexTalk®PI & Clinical Negligence: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts LexisNexis® Webinars Useful information Key PI and Clinical negligence developments ONS releases 2025 annual survey for hours and earnings figures The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has issued provisional 2025 findings and metrics on workers’ pay and hours, based on the annual survey of hours and earnings. These outputs set out yearly estimates of paid hours and remuneration for employees across the UK, broken down by sex and employment status, covering full-time and part-time roles. See: LNB News 23/10/2025 34...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Withdrawal of consent

PRACTICE NOTES
Global merger control round-up: US FTC policy shifts; Kuwait thresholds; Hungary exemption; Egypt post-merger notifications; Taiwan e-filing; gun-jumping fines; other developments (Sep–Oct 2021)

This month brought a revival of the FTC’s decade-old policy compelling acquiring parties subject to an FTC merger enforcement order (ie consent decree) to secure prior approval for any subsequent transaction for at least 10 years, the withdrawal of vertical merger guidelines and related commentary, and updates designed to streamline its second request process. Internationally, Hungary introduced a merger review exemption for state-owned capital funds, Kuwait revised its notification thresholds, the Egyptian Competition Authority announced its intention to enforce post-merger obligation requirements, and Taiwan tabled proposed amendments to its merger control regime... United States—FTC votes to withdraw Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary On 15 September 2021, under the new leadership of Chair Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Commission held its third open meeting. As anticipated, the FTC voted 3–2, along party lines, to withdraw approval of: (i) the Vertical Merger Guidelines (Guidelines), issued jointly with the Department of Justice (DOJ), and (ii) the FCA’s Vertical Merger Commentary. On the same day, the DOJ released a statement confirming it...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
European Enforcement Orders (Regulation (EC) 805/2004): debtor applications to challenge, stay or oppose enforcement, and to rectify or withdraw certificates, before the court of origin and enforcing court

This Practice Note This Practice Note examines the debtor’s position where a creditor seeks to enforce a judgment, court settlement, or authentic instrument concerning an uncontested claim under Regulation (EC) 805/2004—the European Enforcement Order Regulation (the EEO Regulation)—by relying on an EEO. References to “judgments” in this Note should be understood to include court settlements and authentic instruments. A core requirement for an EEO is that the claim was uncontested, as described in Recital (5) of the EEO Regulation: this covers situations where, after verified absence of any challenge by the debtor to the nature or amount of a pecuniary claim, the creditor has obtained either a court decision against the debtor or an enforceable document requiring the debtor’s express consent, whether a court settlement or an authentic document. Once a judgment is certified as an EEO, for enforcement it is treated as if issued by the courts of the Member State where enforcement is pursued. The enforcement procedure itself is then governed by the domestic law of that...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Section 20 Children Act 1989 (England): Local authority duties for voluntary accommodation: consent, parental responsibility, withdrawal, capacity, s17 v s20 and Human Rights Act risks

Practice Note This Practice Note sets out a local authority’s obligation to secure accommodation for children under section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) and describes voluntary accommodation under ChA 1989, s 20, highlighting the practical difficulties an authority may encounter, such as arranging suitable delegation of parental authority and questions regarding parental capacity. Please note this Practice Note concerns the law currently applicable in England. In Wales, the position is governed by the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 and associated statutory instruments; for further material, see Practice Notes: Local authority powers and duties to provide accommodation for children in Wales, Local authority duties to looked after children in Wales, and Local authority duties to children in Wales—child protection. Under section 20 of the Children Act 1989—ChA 1989, s 20—every local authority is under a duty to accommodate children assessed as children in need living in its area who appear to need accommodation due to specified circumstances set out in legislation. A range of considerations...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Withdrawal of consent

PRECEDENTS
Precedent: landlord’s side letter for temporary rent reduction with withdrawal and termination triggers, clawback on assignment, non-variation, rent review disregard, confidentiality and guarantor consent (England and Wales)

[ To be issued on the landlord’s headed paper ] Your Ref: Our Ref: Date: From: [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR a company incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (‘Landlord’, ‘we’, ‘us’) To: [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR a company incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (‘Tenant’, ‘you’, ‘your’) [ CC: [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR a company incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] Dear Sirs, Re: Request for reduced rent payments under your lease dated [ date ] of [ description ] (Property) made between (1) [ name of original landlord ] [ , OR and ] (2) [ name of original tenant ][ and [ name of any original...

Read More Right Arrow