Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Commercial Court: orthodox good arguable case test applies to freezing injunctions; Brownlie jurisdictional analysis rejected; dissipation risk must be inferred from alleged facts, not character (Magomedov v TPG Group)

Published on: 09 January 2024

Published by a LexisNexis Dispute Resolution expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

Magomedov and other companies v TPG Group Holdings (SBS), LP and other companies [2023] EWHC 3134 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case?

The court unequivocally affirmed the orthodox test for a freezing injunction: a good arguable case suffices, and there is no need for a detailed merits appraisal at the interim stage. It underlined that, even though the same terminology appears, the jurisdictional inquiry serves different purposes from the freezing-order analysis. Moreover, any look at the merits for jurisdiction is directed solely to demonstrating that a jurisdictional gateway is met, rather than embarking on a comprehensive merits evaluation. The court cautioned that transposing the three-stage jurisdiction framework into the context of freezing relief would draw both parties and the court into mini-trials at the interlocutory phase, with the attendant danger of depriving claimants of the protective remedy they seek. In addition, the court considered the proper method for assessing the risk of dissipation of assets, making clear that forming a generalised view about the respondent’s character, or perceived morality, is not an appropriate basis for that assessment. The proper focus remains the risk of dissipation rather than character judgements...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow