Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Court of Appeal (England and Wales) affirms invalidity of AstraZeneca’s dapagliflozin patent; plausibility arguments rejected; SPCs fall; interim injunction refused

Published on: 18 July 2025

Published by a Law360 reporter
Legal News
Article summary

A three-judge panel affirmed the conclusions of Michael Tappin KC, who sat as a deputy High Court judge, dismissing AstraZeneca’s attempt to overturn his ruling that its dapagliflozin patent added nothing beyond an earlier international patent application. Justice Richard Arnold, writing for the court, said specialists reading AstraZeneca’s claims would have a ‘legitimate reason to doubt’ that dapagliflozin would serve as an effective therapy for diabetes. The row centres on AstraZeneca’s patent for the dapagliflozin molecule, which lapsed in May 2023. AstraZeneca had obtained supplementary protection certificates for the compound, due to run until May 2028. A number of generic manufacturers — including Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd and Generics (UK) Ltd — petitioned the High Court to revoke the patent and, by extension, the supplementary protections, seeking to pave the way to market their own dapagliflozin before 2028. The High Court first backed the generics in April 2025, observing that AstraZeneca appeared to have selected the compound through an ‘arbitrary selection’ from options already outlined in the international application known as WO 128, which predated AstraZeneca’s filing in question...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow