Published on: 20 November 2025
Published by a Law360 reporter
On 19 November 2025, the estate of crash victim Shikha Garg urged jurors to grant her husband, Soumya Bhattacharya, between US$80m and US$230m, reflecting her ordeal in-flight and its impact on him. Boeing contended that a figure nearer US$12m was fair and proportionate, arguing the estate’s demand would effectively penalise the company for a tragic accident for which it has already acknowledged responsibility. After hearing the verdict, however, Shanin Specter of Kline & Specter PC said the parties had settled the matter before delivering closing arguments earlier that morning, 19 November 2025. The development capped around a week of testimony jurors heard about the March 2019 crash, which happened less than seven minutes after take-off. Garg’s action is the first civil claim to reach a jury over the Boeing 737 Max 8 disaster, which occurred five months after the loss of Lion Air Flight 610, in which 189 people died in similar circumstances. The consolidated Ethiopian Air litigation continues before US District Judge Jorge Alonso, who has previously set trial dates in the matter but ultimately cancelled them as the cases resolved...
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...