Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Haley v Newcold: elective amputation found to be a novus actus; Corr fairness test applied; surveillance evidence decisive (England and Wales)

Published on: 06 November 2025

Published by a LexisNexis PI & Clinical Negligence expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] Lexis Citation 2783 What are the practical implications of this case?

This judgment offered an unusual chance for the court to grapple with causation where it is said the claimant behaved unreasonably, thereby aggravating injury after the defendant’s negligence. The court addressed core questions of factual and legal causation. It contains an analysis of when a novus actus interveniens arises and the fairness test to defendants articulated in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] 1 AC 884 and related authorities. Beyond the doctrinal points, defence practitioners will note the probative material marshalled by the defence to convince the judge that the claimant’s choice to proceed to amputation constituted a novus actus not prompted by unendurable pain. Extensive surveillance was pivotal, as was the lack of prescribed analgesia in the medical notes, together with the range of leisure pursuits undertaken by the claimant, including tenpin bowling, crazy golf, snooker, darts, and airsoft. Each activity involved time on his feet. Accordingly, the judge revisited principles and applied them to facts. The focus was whether the chain of causation was severed by the claimant’s choice, judged for fairness to the defendant...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow