Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Substituting the correct defendant post-limitation: EWHC permits relation-back under LA 1980 s35(6)(b)—negligence claim unchanged despite mistaken successor liability (Office Properties v Adcamp)

Published on: 06 March 2025

Published by a LexisNexis Restructuring & Insolvency expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

Office Properties PL Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Adcamp LLP and another [2025] EWHC 170 (Ch)

What are the practical implications of this case?

This decision underscores how broad the court’s discretion is to allow amendments after limitation has run. That discretion was exercised in the claimants’ favour, even though (1) the slip was their own; and (2) had permission been refused, the claimants might have possessed a strong claim against their legal advisers stemming from the mistake. The court’s stance offers comfort to litigators when liability issues are intricate: such as where ‘an assignment was overlooked, or where the effect of a corporate merger on the whereabouts of a claim was not appreciated, resulting in the joinder of the wrong (sometimes non-existent)’ party. The operative approach was to grant the amendment unless there existed a sound reason to withhold it, on the facts of the case. The decision therefore reassures practitioners that, in this kind of scenario, the position may yet be retrievable. In appropriate circumstances.

What was the background?

The claimants brought a professional negligence claim against BDB Pitmans LLP (BDB), assuming that firm to be the successor to their former solicitors,...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow