Legal News

Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics ( UK) Ltd (trading as Viatris) and another [2022] EWCA Civ 370; Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics ( UK) Ltd (trading as Viatris) and another [2022] EWHC 512 ( Pat) What are the practical implications of this case? This pair of rulings offers useful guidance on the stance the Court of Appeal may adopt when a party is restrained by a final injunction. Although Mylan had signalled an intention to seek permission from the Court of Appeal—permission having been refused by Mr Justice Marcus Smith—it still faced a swift removal from the market. The Court of Appeal responded to the urgency, aiming to ‘hold the ring’ for a short window until a substantive hearing could take place. It indicated that enabling an orderly...

Mars Capital Finance Ltd v Hussain and others [2021] EWHC 2416 ( Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling underlines that, after a transfer of land has been entered on the register, any prior defects in the enforceability of the underlying contract for that transfer cease to matter. Accordingly, earlier formal shortcomings cannot be used to unsettle a completed, registered disposition. That principle is clear and decisive here. In addition—though not essential to the outcome—the judge endorsed the position that sections 43 and 44 of the Companies Act 2006 permit three mechanisms for a company to enter a written contract (by the company or on its behalf). This contrasts with the interpretation that, for the purposes of the Law of Property ( Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, only two methods exist, and it departs from Lewison J’s approach in Redcard Ltd v...

Galer v Mond (administrator of SFPL Ltd) and another [2021] EWHC 1952 ( Ch), [2021] All ER ( D) 110 ( Jan) What are the practical implications of this case? Several elements of this ruling turn on the precise wording of the facility agreement and the deed of assignment, so its broader relevance is limited. Even so, the court set out helpful general guidance: in the absence of any evidence of misconduct, it is wholly improper to imply that a particular administrator will fail to fulfil their duties properly. The judge made plain that one cannot obtain a declaration that an administrator’s appointment is invalid by relying on what he described as 'a smokescreen of general allegations'... What was the background? SFPL Ltd ( SFPL) was incorporated in August 2016 as a vehicle for the acquisition and development of a property in London. There were a number of...

How to operate ethically Suppliers should review the Data Ethics Framework and adhere to its principles. The Framework is available here Suppliers are accountable for clearly informing people why and when their data is shared, so they can be confident it is used lawfully, fairly and in an equitable way The core principles of the Data Ethics Framework are: respect for persons respect for human rights participation accounting for decision Have a clear value proposition Suppliers must make sure the product is designed to deliver a clear outcome for users or the system To secure a clear value proposition, thoroughly research and define user needs, and involve users across the...

As outlined in the editorial note to the Guide, this seventh edition is a comprehensive overhaul and reflects developments since the previous edition, including: the roll-out of electronic working and filing in the Central Office of the Queen’s Bench Division at the Royal Courts of Justice, through the CE- File digital court file and management system amendments to CPR 53 and CPR PD 53 relating to the Media and Communications List changes arising from Brexit and the close of the transition period under the UK Withdrawal Act revisions to the contempt regime updates to the enforcement regime For more information, see: What are the key changes? The following summarises the principal changes practitioners should note: Electronic filing The revised Guide introduces a brand-new Chapter 3 addressing electronic filing and codifying the compulsory use of CE- File for legally...

For data protection specialists, the EU– UK TCA brings encouraging developments. Unrestricted data movement between the EEA and the UK will carry on beyond the close of 2020 ( Article FINPROV.10A(2) also confirms flows from Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway to the UK). That outcome is warmly welcomed. Recent studies indicated that implementing substitute transfer tools might have set UK firms back £1.6bn. Such a sum reflects funds businesses could otherwise have directed to areas like new kit, staff or procedures, yet would instead be siphoned off to compliance spend or higher prices for goods and services due to interruptions to EU– UK data transfers. Data may likewise keep moving freely for law enforcement transfers. That is essential. Maintaining the sharing of data to prevent and detect crime is vital to protecting people on both sides of the Channel. Without this...

One Plus Technology ( Shenzhen) Co, Ltd and other companies v Mitsubishi Electric Corp and another company [2020] EWCA Civ 1562 What are the practical implications of this case? Courts acknowledge that, in confined and exceptional situations, a party’s internal commercial staff should have their access curtailed. Judging whether disclosed material warrants a confidentiality club for case management is a taxing call for lawyers representing clients with sensitive interests. Clients often urge their teams to apply the most stringent ‘external eyes only’ tier, a stance that is not invariably defensible. This ruling identifies significant (though not exhaustive) factors to steer the treatment of confidential disclosure, including: the burden rests on the disclosing side to show that the ‘external eyes only’ label is justified preventing the opposing client from seeing particular records will be unusual and hinge entirely on the case’s specific...

What is the relevance of UK data protection law to the creation or sharing of deepfakes? Is a deepfake likely to be personal data? Neither the General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation ( EU) 2016/976 ( EU GDPR), nor the Data Protection Act 2018 ( DPA 2018) expressly addresses deepfakes. The real question is whether deepfakes fall within the scope of data protection rules, and in particular the DPA 2018. Personal data covers any information linked to an identified or identifiable living individual, which can include a person’s image or voice. In this setting, creating deepfakes involves training an artificial intelligence ( AI) system on the target individual’s facial features and vocal characteristics, enabling those elements to be placed into material featuring another person; doing so necessarily relies on a person’s audio and/or video recordings. Consequently, even if someone were to argue that the...

What are the legal implications of audiovisual manipulation and deepfakes and what challenges do they pose to intellectual property rights, rights in personal information and image rights? ‘ Deepfake’ describes a face-swapping method in which AI-driven tools process images of a person to create a digital double, then overlay that likeness onto other bodies in video or stills. Creations built from a lone source image are usually easy to dismiss, but those trained on thousands of photos or clips can appear highly convincing. In contrast, audiovisual edits that do not employ AI are often labelled ‘shallow fakes’ or ‘cheap fakes’. Deepfakes present broad socio-political threats: they can skew public debate, disrupt elections and national security, and undermine confidence in journalism and public institutions. The risks to individuals and organisations are just as significant, ranging from fake endorsements and forged documentary evidence to loss of creative control over...

Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 ( QB) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision is a helpful authority on quantifying damages for claims involving disclosure of private information, breach of undertakings, breach of confidence, and the misuse of private information. It addresses how compensation should be assessed across overlapping privacy-related wrongs. The principles articulated in the judgment merit close attention by practitioners advising on likely awards in comparable situations, particularly since, in Warby J’s own phrase, ‘the authorities are not very numerous’. Warby J held that Mr Reid succeeded on four distinct causes of action: breach of contract, namely breach of express undertakings provided by Ms Price in 2011 that the relevant material would not be revealed unjustified breach of Mr Reid’s confidence misuse of private information concerning Mr Reid breach of statutory duty under section 4(4) of the Data...

Man Ching Yuen v Landy Chet Kin Wong , First-tier Tribunal ( Property Chamber), 2020 (ref 2016/1089) What are the practical implications of this case? Every day, innumerable deeds are completed across the country. By virtue of section 1(3) of the Law of Property ( Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 ( LP( MP) A 1989), a deed must be signed in the presence of a witness who attests the signing. Yet what amounts to presence? Could witnessing occur via Skype, Facetime, Whats App or similar platforms? In addressing that issue, the FTT indicated, without a definitive ruling, that, under present law, whether the phrase in LP( MP) A 1989, s 1(3) ‘in the presence of a witness’ can be met via video link admits more than one arguable view. The tribunal’s indication fell short of a determination, acknowledging that the statutory wording, as it stands, could...

Bioconstruct Gmb H v Winspear and another [2020] EWHC 7 ( QB) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling rekindles discussion about optimal methods for completing a closing with pre-executed pages, particularly where multiple parties and signatories are involved and where amendments or corrections are made to previously circulated written contracts. The court’s analysis, relating to a deed that was both signed and acted upon by the party seeking to rely on it, yet held invalid and unenforceable, underscores the need for caution when attaching pre-signed signature pages to deeds. In this respect, the judgment draws attention to a circumstance not expressly covered by the Law Society of England & Wales’ Practice Note, ‘ Execution of documents by virtual means’ (16 February 2010). That guidance identifies Koenigsblatt v Sweet as the leading authority on ratification for written...

Brake v Guy [2019] EWHC 3332 ( Ch) What was the background? This judgment addresses two applications. The first sought an injunction preventing three respondents (the Guy Parties) from using material obtained from an email account said to have been wrongly accessed by them (the documents application). The second asked for a declaration that the opposing parties (the Brakes) could not rely on legal professional privilege over various documents within that account where they were in furtherance of an unlawful scheme (the LPP application). Both applications formed part of broader proceedings between the Guy Parties— Dr Geoffrey Guy, the Chedington Court Estate Ltd and Axnoller Events Ltd—and the Brakes, Mrs Nihal Brake and Mr Andrew Brake. The dispute concerned two properties, a farm and a cottage; the Brakes had occupied the cottage, and its title had become the subject of serious issues within...

Amending a claim to allege breach of confidence ( Slater & Gordon v Watchstone) Slater & Gordon ( UK) 1 Ltd v Watchstone [2019] EWHC 2371 ( Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? Two principal practical consequences follow from this decision: It serves as a caution for those involved in M& A deals or litigating about them. Although exploiting every route to gather intelligence on the other side may appear commercially astute, inviting the opponent’s corporate adviser to tacitly share confidential material is arguably unlawful and may leave participants exposed to a significant claim It also exemplifies the court’s pragmatic and constructive approach when major disclosure issues arise that warrant an amendment—if persuasive arguments emerge, the court will seek to accommodate them. The familiar disapproval of late amendments did not feature in the judgment, perhaps suggesting that......

The swift expansion of Io MTs has delivered major advances in healthcare across the board, enhancing efficiency and elevating the quality of care provided to patients. Deloitte recently observed that the Io MTs market is projected to be worth USD158.1bn by 2022. Wearables, lifestyle gadgets and mobile health applications are steadily gaining traction with consumers of all ages. A broad selection of connected, intelligent health devices now exists, from smart watches, smart earplugs and smart glasses to activity trackers and other tools that help us keep tabs on our fitness. We are tracking our steps, heart rate, pulse, blood pressure and receiving prompts about when medicines should be taken on time. As with any product, the chance of malfunction or defect that causes personal injury or damage to property remains tangible. For connected technologies in particular, the legal position is...

Awbury Technical Solutions LLC v Karson Management ( Bermuda) Ltd [2019] EWHC 233 ( Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision explores the interaction between section 12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 ( HRA 1998) and applications for interim injunctions to restrain the use of confidential information in a commercial setting. Although Butcher J did not foreclose the possibility that, in a business context, such relief might amount to an interference with freedom of expression, his judgment indicates that will seldom be so. In particular, where the communication serves only to advance the communicator’s financial interests, is directed to a very small group of recipients, and there is no suggestion that the material is journalistic, literary or artistic, the right to freedom of expression will generally not be engaged. The decision also appears to be the first in England and Wales to...

What impact do the Business Contract Terms ( Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018 have on rights of set-off (contractual and other)? The explanatory memorandum to the Business Contract Terms ( Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018, SI 2018/1254 (the Regulations), states plainly that these provisions are introduced to render ineffective terms in specified contracts that restrict the assignment of receivables, with effect from 31 December 2018. As a result, many businesses that were previously prevented by contractual limitations will now be able to assign receivables and utilise products such as invoice financing in relation to sums owed to them. This may influence the right of set-off, as some businesses could opt for rapid liquidity by assigning receivables to a third party through arrangements like invoice finance, rather than exercising any right of set-off against invoices presented to them. The principle of set-off is firmly...

What’s the background to robotic surgery? Robotic surgery, a form of minimally invasive laparoscopic procedure performed with robotic systems, has been available in the UK since 2001. Instead of working directly on the patient, the surgeon uses computer hardware and software to operate from a remote console, carrying out the procedure via a video screen or monitor. Its use has, so far, been relatively limited, mainly for certain operations such as prostate surgery and other cancer procedures. Shorter operating times Lower risk of infection Less blood loss and reduced post-operative pain Quicker recovery and a shorter hospital stay That said, surgeons need extensive training to work ‘remotely’, as this represents a completely new surgical skill, especially given the historically limited haptic (i.e. kinaesthetic) feedback, whether ‘force’ or ‘tactile’. Issues can also occur outside the surgeon’s direct view, including...

How has the exemption available for controllers under the GDPR in relation to liability to compensate data subjects changed? Under the earlier Data Protection Directive 95/46/ EC ( Article 23(2)), where a person was entitled to damages from a controller due to unlawful processing, the controller could rely on a potential exemption if it was not responsible for the event that caused the loss. Recital 55 offered two illustrations of situations for which the controller would not bear responsibility: a mistake by the data subject, and a case of force majeure The language of these provisions lacked clarity, and the concept of ‘force majeure’ has no consistent definition across EU legal systems (it does not even carry a settled meaning in English law, depending heavily on contractual wording). Unsurprisingly, this carve-out, and the reference to force majeure, was therefore loosely carried across into...

Original news Trade Secrets ( Enforcement etc) Regulations 2018, LNB News 18/05/2018 76 SI 2018/597 Measures are introduced to give effect to EU Trade Secrets Directive 2016/943/ EU, which protects undisclosed know‑how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. While several provisions of Directive 2016/943/ EU are already reflected in UK law, these Regulations address the areas where gaps remain and where implementing the Directive will secure legal certainty, making the law more transparent and coherent across all UK jurisdictions in relation to proceedings about the unlawful obtaining, use or disclosure of a trade secret. The Regulations take effect on 9 June 2018. What is the background to the Regulations and Trade Secrets Directive? Historically, protection for trade secrets has been inconsistent across EU Member States. Around a third of Member States have no specific legislation addressing the...