Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Swedish Supreme Court limits Achmea/Komstroy: ECT arbitration valid for non‑EU investor; two‑step test for partial annulment with res judicata assessment (Blue Gas Holding)

Published on: 23 June 2025

Published by a LexisNexis Arbitration expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

‘Blue Gas Holding’ (Republic of Poland v PD, Swedish Supreme Court Case No. T 555-24) What are the practical implications of this case?

The Swedish Supreme Court has signalled a pro‑arbitration posture in Blue Gas Holding, offering clearer direction on how far the Court of Justice’s Achmea doctrine extends. Put briefly, where a non‑EU investor’s discrete stake within a broader investment can be identified separately from EU investors’ interests, a tribunal seated in Sweden may take jurisdiction over that individual claim. Consequently, Sweden‑seated tribunals could now accept jurisdiction in scenarios where some tribunals, until recently, might have reached the opposite conclusion. Nonetheless, determining jurisdiction demands a rigorous examination of res judicata, a factor that can complicate proceedings and outcomes. Following Blue Gas Holding, a key issue in mixed investor disputes—those involving both EU and non‑EU participants—is whether the non‑EU investors’ claims can be delineated and permitted to advance without inadvertently causing the EU investors’ claims to become res judicata, whether in Sweden or in another pertinent legal order. The practical task, therefore, is to structure and substantiate the non‑EU claims so that they remain distinct in law and fact, while avoiding prejudice to any parallel EU‑linked claims and prior determinations...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow