Published on: 23 January 2024
Published by a LexisNexis Corporate Crime expert
The Post Office Horizon scandal stands as a stark case of private prosecutions going awry.
Between 1999 and 2015, hundreds of self-employed Post Office workers (sub-postmasters) were wrongly taken to court for false accounting, theft and fraud. The accusations stemmed from defects in Horizon, the accounting system supplied by Fujitsu. Horizon appeared to show cash missing from branch accounts—but the funds had not vanished.
While some were imprisoned, bankrupted, stripped of their contracts or saw their personal lives fall apart, the Post Office maintained for years that nothing was amiss with Horizon’s data. From the early 2000s, however, the system was erroneously flagging shortfalls at individual branches.
In 2009, Computer Weekly reported claims that Horizon was flawed and highlighted prosecutions of sub-postmasters. The Post Office began to look into the issues, yet in 2015 the then chief executive, Paula Vennells, told a parliamentary committee there was no evidence of any miscarriage of justice. Four years later, the Post Office agreed to settle claims brought by 555 sub-postmasters...
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...