Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Hassam v Rabot: Supreme Court confirms whiplash tariff applies only to whiplash; non-whiplash PSLA at common law with Sadler overlap deduction (England and Wales)

Published on: 08 May 2024

Published by a LexisNexis Insurance & Reinsurance expert
Legal News
imgtext
Article summary

What are the practical implications of this case?

The Supreme Court’s ruling deserves approval, as it clarifies that the whiplash reforms leave PSLA awards for non‑whiplash harm untouched in mixed injury claims. That element of the judgment aligns with the plain text and underlying purpose of the reforms, namely to curtail compensation for whiplash alone. Yet the two‑stage methodology ultimately endorsed by the Court is liable to generate significant practical difficulties. It obliges judges to trim the overall PSLA to reflect any overlap between common law damages for the non‑whiplash injury and the statutory tariff for the whiplash injury. The tribunal must attempt this balancing act in the dark, because, as the Court appeared to accept, there is no means of identifying what slice of the tariff corresponds to the overlapping component of PSLA. The sole steer supplied by the Court is that this slice is smaller than it would have been had damages for whiplash PSLA been valued at common law. On that footing, one would infer that any reduction should be restrained, acknowledging the tariff is compressed and the overlapping PSLA is small versus a common law valuation, so the court’s adjustment ought, accordingly, to be modest, that...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow